Recognizing Student Caregivers: Applying the Age Inclusivity Domains in Higher Education Model

Abstract

Currently, five million students attending post-secondary education are also caregivers, with impacts on academic success, mental health, and retention. Rooted in the age-inclusivity in higher education model, this paper illustrates how mixed-methods data from a campus-wide study can be used to assess the prevalence and impact of unpaid caregiving on students. Respondents (n = 241) who identified as a caregiver described their caregiving circumstances and completed measures related to the impact of caregiving on personal care, academic aspects, and quality of life. Lack of support (47.0%) and financial matters surrounding caregiving (26.2%) placed student caregivers at risk for low quality of life. Qualitative data from focus groups (n = 16) showed that student caregivers encompassed a range of challenges, emotions, and coping strategies. Guided by the age-inclusive domains framework, universities can empower student caregivers to balance family responsibilities with career and personal growth regardless of age.

Keywords

family caregiver college students age inclusivity mixed methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldridge

(2018). Where are we now? Twenty-five years of research, policy and practice on young carers. Critical Social Policy, 38(1), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317724525

Arnett

J. J.

(2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469

Beach

D. L.

(1997). Family caregiving: The positive impact on adolescent relationships. The Gerontologist, 37(2), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.2.233

Beach

S. R.

Schulz

Donovan

Rosland

A. M.

(2021). Family caregiving during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Gerontologist, 61(5), 650–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab049

Bowen

L. M.

Silverstein

N. M.

Montepare

J. M.

Whitbourne

S. K.

Lin

(2025). Evidence-based strategies for creating age-inclusive campuses. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 18(S1), S358–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000575

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brunton

Buckley

(2021). You’re thrown in the deep end: Adult learner identity formation in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2696–2709. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1767049

Cassidy

Giles

(2013). Further exploration of the Young Carers Perceived Stress Scale: Identifying a benefit-finding dimension. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18(3), 642–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12017

D’Amen

Socci

Santini

(2021). Intergenerational caring: A systematic literature review on young and young adult caregivers of older people. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01976-z

10.

Department of Aging and Independent Living National Family Caregiver Support Program. (2014). National family caregiver support program caregiver prioritization .

11.

EAB. (2023). Adult learners: Who they are and what they want from college. https://eab.com/resources/blog/adult-education-blog/adult-learners-who-they-are-what-they-want-college/ .

12.

Elwick

Joseph

Becker

(2010). Manual for the Adult Carer Quality of Life Questionnaire (AC-QoL). The Princess Royal Trust for Carers.

13.

Erikson

E. H.

(1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, 1(1), 1–171. https://archive.org/details/psychologicaliss0001erik

14.

Greene

Cohen

Siskowski

Toyinbo

(2017). The relationship between family caregiving and the mental health of emerging adult caregivers. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 44(4), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-016-9526-7

15.

Houser

Caldera

Flinn

Choula

(2026, March). Valuing the invaluable 2026: Family caregivers’ contribution reaches $1 trillion. AARP Public Policy Institute. https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/ppi/topics/ltss/family-caregiving/valuing-the-invaluable-2026-family-caregivers-contribution-reaches-1-trillion.doi.10.26419-2fppi.00402.001.pdf .

16.

Kamer

J. A.

Ishitani

T. T.

(2021). First-year, nontraditional student retention at four-year institutions: How predictors of attrition vary across time. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(3), 560–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119858732

17.

Kroger

(2006). Identity development: Adolescence through adulthood (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

18.

Lee

Tang

Kim

K. H.

Albert

S. M.

(2014). The vicious cycle of parental caregiving and financial well-being: A longitudinal study of women. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(3), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu001

19.

Lincoln

Y S

Guba

E G

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

20.

Moloney

Lafferty

Mucheru

Kroll

(2023). An exploration of young carers’ experiences in secondary school and their perceptions regarding their future career: A scoping review. International Journal of Care and Caring, 7(3), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788221X16765406552182

21.

Montepare

J. M.

Farah

K. S.

Bloom

S. F.

Tauriac

(2020). Age-friendly universities (AFU): Possibilities and power in campus connections. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 41(3), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2020.1726744

22.

National Alliance for Caregiving [NAC]. (2020). National Alliance for Caregiving (NAC) and AARP, Caregiving in the U.S. 2020 (Washington, DC: NAC and Washington, DC: AARP, May 2020).

23.

National Alliance for Caregiving [NAC]. (2025). National Alliance for Caregiving (NAC) and AARP, Caregiving in the U.S. 2025 (Washington, DC: NAC and Washington, DC: AARP, May 2025).

24.

Newman

Chalmers

Wang

A. Z. Y.

Ciotti

Luxmykanthan

Mansell

(2023). The impact of public health restrictions on young caregivers and how they navigated a pandemic: Baseline interviews from a longitudinal study conducted in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(14), Article 6410. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146410

25.

O’Kelly

(2022). Developing the age-friendly university global network. In C. M. Gardiner and E. O. Webb (eds.), The age-friendly lens (pp. 74–88). Routledge.

26.

Roling

Falkson

Hellmers

Metzing

(2020). Early caregiving experiences and the impact on transition into adulthood and further life: A literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 34(3), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12757

27.

Silverman

Brotman

Molgat

Gagnon

(2020). “I’ve always been the one who drops everything”: The lived experiences and life-course impacts of young adult women carers. International Journal of Care and Caring, 4(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788220X15859363711424

28.

Silverstein

N. M.

Whitbourne

S. K.

Bowen

L. M.

Montepare

J. M.

Jansen

Beaulieu

Prasad

(2022). Assessing age inclusivity in higher education: Introducing the age-friendly inventory and campus climate survey. The Gerontologist, 62(1), e48–e61. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab090

29.

Soria

K. M.

McAndrew

Horgos

Chirikov

Jones-White

(2020). Undergraduate student caregivers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: Financial hardships, food and housing insecurity, mental health, and academic obstacles. SERU Consortium, University of California - Berkeley and University of Minnesota. https://cshe.berkeley.edu/seru-covid-surveyreports .

30.

Thomas

N. S.

Barr

P. B.

Hottell

D. L.

Adkins

A. E.

Dick

D. M.

(2021). Longitudinal influence of behavioral health, emotional health, and student involvement on college student retention. Journal of College Student Development, 62(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2021.0001

31.

Van der Werf

H. M.

Luttik

M. L. A.

Francke

A. L.

Roodbol

P. F.

Paans

(2019). Students growing up with a chronically ill family member: A survey on experienced consequences, background characteristics, and risk factors. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7834-6

32.

Whitbourne

S. K.

Bowen

L. M.

Silverstein

N. M.

Montepare

J. M.

Stokes

J. E.

(2024). Promoting age inclusivity in higher education: Campus practices and perceptions by students, faculty, and staff. Research in Higher Education, 65(4), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-024-09785-8