Well-being has been shown to improve with age, but underlying mechanisms are unclear. We tested a conceptual model that posited that age-related increases in present time orientation foster greater dispositional mindfulness and savoring the moment, and that these psychological processes are pathways that link older age to better well-being. U.S. adults (N = 797, Mage = 45.57 years, SD = 15.07, range: 20–88) completed an online, self-report survey of their present time perspective, dispositional mindfulness, savoring the moment, and hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Using structural equation modeling, our conceptual model was a good fit to the data. Older age was associated with greater present time orientation, which was associated with both greater mindfulness and savoring the moment, and ultimately related to greater eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Mindfulness and savoring interventions may be beneficial for promoting present moment orientation, and subsequently, better well-being. However, longitudinal studies are needed to establish temporal associations.
BaltesP. B.BaltesM. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.AakerJ. L.GarbinskyE. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830764
3.
BishopS. R.LauM.ShapiroS.CarlsonL.AndersonN. D.CarmodyJ.SegalZ. V.AbbeyS.SpecaM.VeltingD.DevinsG. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077
BrownK. W.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
6.
Bruine de BruinW.ParkerA. M.StroughJ. (2016). Choosing to be happy? Age differences in “maximizing” decision strategies and experienced emotional well-being. Psychology and Aging, 31(3), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000073
7.
BryantF. (2003). Savoring Beliefs Inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savouring. Journal of Mental Health, 12(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963823031000103489
8.
BryantF. B.VeroffJ. (2007). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2016). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? In KazdinA. E. (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (pp. 133–139). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-009
10.
CainM. K.ZhangZ.BergemanC. S. (2018). Time and other considerations in mediation design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(6), 952–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417743003
CarstensenL. L.FungH. H.CharlesS. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024569803230
13.
CarstensenL. L.TuranB.ScheibeS.RamN.Ersner-HershfieldH.Samanez-LarkinG. R.BrooksK. P.NesselroadeJ. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021285
de VibeM.SolhaugI.RosenvingeJ. H.TyssenR.HanleyA.GarlandE. (2018). Six-year positive effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on mindfulness, coping and well-being in medical and psychology students: Results from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 13(4), e0196053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196053
DienerE. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
18.
DisabatoD. J.GoodmanF. R.KashdanT. B.ShortJ. L.JardenA. (2016). Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000209
19.
DotyD. H.GlickW. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results?Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 374–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819814002
20.
ErismanS. M.RoemerL. (2010). A preliminary investigation of the effects of experimentally induced mindfulness on emotional responding to film clips. Emotion, 10(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017162
21.
EysenckM. W.FajkowskaM. (2018). Anxiety and depression: Toward overlapping and distinctive features. Cognition and Emotion, 32(7), 1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1330255
22.
FeldmanG.HayesA.KumarS.GreesonJ.LaurenceauJ. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177–190.
23.
FelsmanP.VerduynP.AydukO.KrossE. (2017). Being present: Focusing on the present predicts improvements in life satisfaction but not happiness. Emotion, 17(7), 1047–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000333
24.
FordC. G.WilsonJ. M.AltmanN.StroughJ.ShookN. J. (2020). Profiles of mindfulness across adulthood. Mindfulness, 11(6), 1557–1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01372-z
GeigerP. J.MoreyJ. N.SegerstromS. C. (2017). Beliefs about savoring in older adulthood: Aging and perceived health affect temporal components of perceived savoring ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.049
27.
GerstorfD.RamN.MayrazG.HidajatM.LindenbergerU.WagnerG. G.SchuppJ. (2010). Late-life decline in well-being across adulthood in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Something is seriously wrong at the end of life. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017543
28.
GrowneyC. M.CarstensenL. L.EnglishT. (2024). Momentary savoring in daily life in an adult life-span sample. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001423
29.
GrühnD.SharifianN.ChuQ. (2016). The limits of a limited future time perspective in explaining age differences in emotional functioning. Psychology and Aging, 31(6), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000060
30.
HurleyD. B.KwonP. (2012). Results of a study to increase savoring the moment: Differential impact on positive and negative outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9280-8
31.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
32.
KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
KeyesC. L. (2002). The exchange of emotional support with age and its relationship with emotional well-being by age. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(6), P518–P525. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.6.P518
34.
KikenL. G.ShookN. J. (2012). Mindfulness and emotional distress: The role of negatively biased cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.031
35.
KimK.LehningA. J.SaccoP. (2016). Assessing the factor structure of well-being in older adults: Findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Aging & Mental Health, (8), 814–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1037245
36.
KimE. S.SunJ. K.ParkN.PetersonC. (2013). Purpose in life and reduced incidence of stroke in older adults: ‘The Health and Retirement Study’. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 74(5), 427–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.01.013
37.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
38.
KohlsN.EschT.GerberL.AdrianL.WittmannM. (2019). Mindfulness meditation and fantasy relaxation in a group setting leads to a diminished sense of self and an increased present orientation. Behavioral Sciences, 9(8), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9080087
39.
KosugiT.NinomiyaA.NagaokaM.HashimotoZ.SawadaK.ParkS.FujisawaD.MimuraM.SadoM. (2021). Effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for improving subjective and eudaimonic well-being in healthy individuals: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 700916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700916
40.
LefèvreH. K.Mirabel-SarronC.DocteurA.LeclercV.LaszczA.GorwoodP.BungenerC. (2019). Time perspective differences between depressed patients and non-depressed participants, and their relationships with depressive and anxiety symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 246, 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.053
41.
LindenbergerU.BaltesP. B. (1997). Intellectual functioning in old and very old age: Cross-sectional results from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 12(3), 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.12.3.410
42.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
43.
LyubomirskyS.LepperH. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041
44.
MockS. E.EibachR. P. (2011). Aging attitudes moderate the effect of subjective age on psychological well-being: Evidence from a 10-year longitudinal study. Psychology and Aging, 26(4), 979–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023877
45.
MroczekD. K.KolarzC. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1333–1349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1333
46.
OgletreeA. M.KatzB. (2021). How do older adults recruited using MTurk differ from those in a national probability sample?The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(2), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020940197
47.
PalmerC. A.GentzlerA. L. (2019). Age-related differences in savoring across adulthood: The role of emotional goals and future time perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1281–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0001-4
48.
PrakashR. S.HussainM. A.SchirdaB. (2015). The role of emotion regulation and cognitive control in the association between mindfulness disposition and stress. Psychology and Aging, 30(1), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038544
49.
QuoidbachJ.BerryE. V.HansenneM.MikolajczakM. (2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.048
50.
RaesA. K.BruyneelL.LoeysT.MoerkerkeB.De RaedtR. (2015). Mindful attention and awareness mediate the association between age and negative affect. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt074
51.
RamseyM. A.GentzlerA. L. (2014). Age differences in subjective well-being across adulthood: The roles of savoring and future time perspective. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 78(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.78.1.b
52.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
53.
RyffC. D. (2018). Eudaimonic well-being: Highlights from 25 years of inquiry. In Diversity in harmony–insights from psychology: Proceedings of the 31st international congress of psychology (pp. 375–395). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
54.
RyffC. D.KeyesC. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
55.
RyffC. D.SingerB. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
56.
Salces-CuberoI. M.Ramírez-FernándezE.Ortega-MartínezA. R. (2019). Strengths in older adults: Differential effect of savoring, gratitude and optimism on well-being. Aging & Mental Health, 23(8), 1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1471585
57.
ShookN. J.FordC.StroughJ.DelaneyR.BarkerD. (2017). In the moment and feeling good: Age differences in mindfulness and positive affect. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(4), 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000139
58.
SmithJ. L.HanniA. A. (2019). Effects of a savoring intervention on resilience and well-being of older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817693375
59.
SnippeE.NyklíčekI.SchroeversM. J.BosE. H. (2015). The temporal order of change in daily mindfulness and affect during mindfulness-based stress reduction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000057
60.
StoneA. A.SchwartzJ. E.BroderickJ. E.DeatonA. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(22), 9985–9990. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003744107
61.
StroughJ.Bruine de BruinW.ParkerA. M.LemasterP.PichayayothinN.DelaneyR. (2016). Hour glass half full or half empty? Future time perspective and preoccupation with negative events across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 31(6), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000097
62.
WatkinsK. E.HunterS. B.BurnamM. A.PincusH. A.NicholsonG. (2005). Review of treatment recommendations for persons with a co-occurring affective or anxiety and substance use disorder. Psychiatric Services, 56(8), 913–926. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.8.913
63.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
64.
WilsonJ. M.StroughJ.ShookN. J. (2022). Benefits of experience and knowledge for older adults’ monetary sequence preferences. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 94(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150211009464
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
