This Epilogue extends themes from the Special Issue, with a particular focus on how communication operates during times of social disruption. Three forms of disruption are discussed: societal-global disruption (manifested in the Covid-19 pandemic), individual-relational disruption (manifested in a dementia diagnosis), and societal progress (manifested in technological change). The Epilogue discusses how these disruptions affect the quality and quantity of intergenerational contact, and feed into hostile and benevolent forms of ageism. The conclusions discuss connections between disruptions and the Communication Ecology Model of Successful Aging, as well as links to societal segregation, thus suggesting the multiplicity of ways that communication serves as a platform for healthier approaches to aging in society.
Amichai-HamburgerY.McKennaK. Y. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 825–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00037.x
2.
AndersonL. B.GettingsP. E. (2022). “Old age scares me”: Exploring young adults’ feelings about aging before and during COVID-19. Journal of Aging Studies, 60, e100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2022.100998
3.
ApricenoM.LytleA.MonahanC.MacdonaldJ.LevyS. R. (2021). Prioritizing health care and employment resources during COVID-19: Roles of benevolent and hostile ageism. The Gerontologist, 61(1), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa165
4.
ArpinoB.PasqualiniM.BordoneV.Solé-AuróA. (2021). Older people’s nonphysical contacts and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown. The Gerontologist, 61(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa144
5.
BarrettA. E.MichaelC.PadavicI. (2021). Calculated ageism: Generational sacrifice as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(4), e201–e205. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa132
6.
BirklandJ. L. (2024). How older adult information and communication technology users are impacted by aging stereotypes: A multigenerational perspective. New Media & Society, 26(7), 3967–3988. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221108959
7.
BrancoK. J.WilliamsonJ. B. (1982). Stereotyping and the life cycle: Views of aging and the aged. In MillerA. G. (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping (pp. 364–410). Praeger.
8.
CooperR. A.PittsM. J.HarwoodJ. (2022). “That's when the relationship shifted”: Relational and communicative turning points in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Personal Relationships, 29(1), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12412
9.
CowgillD. O.HolmesL. (Eds.). (1972). Aging and modernization. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
10.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
11.
DixonJ.TredouxC.DurrheimK.FinchilescuG.ClackB. (2008). ‘The inner citadels of the color line’: Mapping the micro-ecology of racial segregation in everyday life spaces. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1547–1569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00123.x
12.
DruryL.AbramsD.SwiftH. J. (2022). Intergenerational contact during and beyond COVID-19. Journal of Social Issues, 78(4), 860–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12551
13.
DruryL.AbramsD.SwiftH. J.LamontR. A.GerocovaK. (2017). Can caring create prejudice? An investigation of positive and negative intergenerational contact in care settings and the generalisation of blatant and subtle age prejudice to other older people. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2294
14.
FletcherJ. R. (2021). Destigmatising dementia: The dangers of felt stigma and benevolent othering. Dementia, 20(2), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301219884821
15.
FloydK. (2019). Affectionate communication in close relationships. Cambridge University Press.
16.
GilesH. (forthcoming). The role of resilience in intergenerational communication and aging in later life. In BuzzanellP. M. (Ed.), The language of resilience: Multiple social and applied domains. Peter Lang.
17.
GilesH.HelmleJ. (2011). Elder abuse and neglect: A communicative framework. In DuszakA.OkulskaU. (Eds.), Language, culture and the dynamics of age (pp. 223–252). Mouton de Gruyter.
18.
GilesH. (in press). Successful and positive aging: Intergenerational communication and older adults. In SochaT. (Ed.), Palgrave handbook of positive communication for livable futures. Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
Jimenez-SotomayorM. R., Gomez-MorenoC., & Soto-Perez-de-CelisE. (2020). Coronavirus, ageism, and twitter: An evaluation of tweets about older adults and COVID-19. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68(8), 1661–1665. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16508
20.
JucksR.HendriksF. (2021). Stay safe and stay at home! Research on Language and Communication related to COVID-19 [Special Issue]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(5–6).
21.
KakullaB. (2024). 2024 Tech Trends and Adults 50+. AARP.
22.
KrepsG. A. (2001). Sociology of disasters. In SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B. (Eds), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 3718–3721). Pergamon.
23.
LaorT. (2022). My social network: Group differences in frequency of use, active use, and interactive use on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Technology in Society, 68, e101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101922
24.
LinM. C.GilesH. (2013). The dark side of family communication: A communication model of elder abuse and neglect. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(8), 1275–1290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610212002347
25.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2015). Modern attitudes toward older adults in the aging world: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 993–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039469
26.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2016). Resource scarcity and prescriptive attitudes generate subtle intergenerational older-worker exclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 72(1), 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12159
27.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.HewstoneM.NeumannD. L. (2018). Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(12), e12422. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12422
28.
SchrijversE.PrinsC.PasschierR. (2021). Social disruption. In SchrijversE.PrinsC.PasschierR. (Eds.), Preparing for digital disruption (pp. 9–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77838-5_2
29.
SpearsR.PostmesT. (2015). Group identity, social influence, and collective action online. In SundarS. S. (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 23–46). Wiley.
30.
SwiftH. J.ChasteenA. L. (2021). Ageism in the time of COVID-19. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220983452
31.
WaltherJ. B.WhittyM. T. (2021). Language, psychology, and new new media: The hyperpersonal model of mediated communication at twenty-five years. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967703
32.
WhiteF. A.BorincaI.VezzaliL.ReynoldsK. J.Blomster LysholJ. K.VerrelliS.Falomir-PichastorJ. M. (2021). Beyond direct contact: The theoretical and societal relevance of indirect contact for improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12400
