Age-friendly Environment and Aging in Place: Finding from Latent Profile Analysis

Abstract

Older adults prefer ageing in place (AIP) rather than institutionalized facilities. Although its advantages, AIP can be challenging when communities are unable to meet residents’ needs. This study aims to identify the relationship between the level of age-friendliness of community and AIP. We used AARP Age-friendly Community Survey data with 6670 older adults in the USA. We used responses from 63 items assessing various aspects of a community's age-friendliness to identify different types of age-friendly communities (AFCs) through latent profile analysis (LPA). We then ran multinomial logistic regression to examine whether the types of AFC were associated with AIP. LPA revealed three types of AFC: Underdeveloped, developing, and developed. Regression results showed older adults living in underdeveloped and developing communities are less likely to AIP compared to those in the developed community. These results show a positive impact of AFC on intention to AIP. Policymakers should consider expanding AFC initiatives for the growing number of older adults.

Keywords

age-friendly community ageing in place community development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AARP. (2018). Livability for all: The AARP age-friendly community surveys. https://www.aarp.org/research/topics/community/ info-2016/2016-aarp-age-friendly-community-survey.html

Ahn

Kang

Kwon

H. J.

(2020). The concept of aging in place as intention. The Gerontologist, 60(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny167

Becker

S. E.

Dickinson

J. I.

Sullivan

Cline

(2020). Baby boomer knowledge and stigma toward aging in place and residential assistive devices. Journal of Interior Design, 45(3), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12176

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2009, October 15). Healthy places terminology. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/terminology.htm

Chaudhury

Oswald

(2019). Advancing understanding of person-environment interaction in later life: One step further. Journal of Aging Studies, 51, 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2019.100821

Choi

Y. J.

(2020). Age-friendly features in home and community and the self-reported health and functional limitation of older adults: The role of supportive environments. Journal of Urban Health, 97(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00462-6

Choi

Y. J.

(2022). Understanding aging in place: Home and community features, perceived age-friendliness of community, and intention toward aging in place. The Gerontologist, 62(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab070

Chung

Jeon

Song

(2015). The influence of age-friendly community on the self-perception of aging among Korean older adults. Journal of Social Science, 26(3), 29–46. http://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2015.07.26.3.29

Fausset

C. B.

Kelly

A. J.

Rogers

W. A.

Fisk

A. D.

(2011). Challenges to aging in place: Understanding home maintenance difficulties. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 25(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2011.571105

10.

Forsyth

Molinsky

(2020). What is aging in place? Confusions and contradictions. Housing Policy Debate, 31(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2020.1793795

11.

Gibney

Zhang

Brennan

(2020). Age-friendly environments and psychosocial well-being: A study of older urban residents in Ireland. Aging & Mental Health, 24(12), 2022–2033. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1652246

12.

Gilleard

Hyde

Higgs

(2007). The impact of age, place, aging in place, and attachment to place on the well-being of the over 50s in England. Research on Aging, 29(6), 590–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027507305730

13.

Hope Cheong

(2006). Communication context, social cohesion and social capital building among hispanic immigrant families. Community, Work and Family, 9(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800600743495

14.

Iecovich

(2014). Aging in place: From theory to practice. Anthropological notebooks, 20(1).

15.

Jeste

D. V.

Blazer

D. G.

Buckwalter

K. C.

Cassidy

K. K.

Fishman

Gwyther

L. P.

Levin

S. M.

Phillipson

Rao

R. R.

Schmeding

Vega

W. A.

Avanzino

J. A.

Glorioso

D. K.

Feather

(2016). Age-friendly communities initiative: Public health approach to promoting successful aging. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24(12), 1158–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2016.07.021

16.

Kan

H. Y.

Forsyth

Molinsky

(2020). Measuring the built environment for aging in place: A review of neighborhood audit tools. Journal of Planning Literature, 35(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220903497

17.

Kendig

Phillipson

(2014). Building age-friendly communities: New approaches to challenging health and social inequalities. If you Could do one Thing…”. Nine Local Actions to Reduce Health Inequalities, 102–111.

18.

Kim

Buckley

T. D.

Burnette

Huang

Kim

(2022a). Age-friendly communities and older adults’ health in the United States. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9292. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159292

19.

Kim

Buckley

Burnette

Kim

Cho

(2022b). Measurement indicators of age-friendly communities: Findings from the AARP age-friendly community survey. The Gerontologist, 62(1), e17–e27. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab055

20.

Krout

J. A.

Wethington

(2003). Residential choices and experiences of older adults: Pathways to life quality. Springer Publishing Company.

21.

Lanza

S. T.

Bray

B. C.

Collins

L. M.

(2013). An introduction to latent class and latent transition analysis. Handbook of Psychology, 2, 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop202024

22.

Lawton

M. P.

Nahemow

(1973). The psychology of adult development and aging. In Eisdorfer

Lawton

M. P.

(Eds.), Ecology and the aging process (pp. 619–674). American Psychological Association.

23.

Lehning

A. J.

Smith

R. J.

Dunkle

R. E.

(2015). Do age-friendly characteristics influence the expectation to age in place? A comparison of low-income and higher income Detroit elders. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 34(2), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813483210

24.

Levasseur

Dubois

M. F.

Généreux

Menec

Raina

Roy

Gabaude

Couturier

& St-Pierre

(2017). Capturing how age-friendly communities foster positive health, social participation and health equity: A study protocol of key components and processes that promote population health in aging Canadians. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4392-7

25.

Löfqvist

Granbom

Himmelsbach

Iwarsson

Oswald

Haak

(2013). Voices on relocation and aging in place in very old age—a complex and ambivalent matter. The Gerontologist, 53(6), 919–927. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt034

26.

Lowenstein

(2009). Elder abuse and neglect—“old phenomenon”: New directions for research, legislation, and service developments: (2008 Rosalie S. Wolf Memorial Elder Abuse Prevention Award—International Category Lecture). Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 21(3), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/08946560902997637

27.

Marek

K. D.

Stetzer

Adams

S. J.

Popejoy

L. L.

Rantz

(2012). Aging in place versus nursing home care: Comparison of costs to medicare and medicaid. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 5(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20110802-01

28.

Mitzner

T. L.

Chen

T. L.

Kemp

C. C.

Rogers

W. A.

(2014). Identifying the potential for robotics to assist older adults in different living environments. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0218-7

29.

Muthén

L. K.

(2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x

30.

Nieboer

A. P.

Cramm

J. M.

(2018). Age-friendly communities matter for older people’s well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(8), 2405–2420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9923-5

31.

Nilsen

K. M.

Medvene

L. J.

Ofei-Dodoo

Smith

DiLollo

Graham

Nance

(2018). Aging in community: Home-and community-based services clients’ use of computers as a protective factor for social isolation and loneliness. Educational Gerontology, 44(10), 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2018.1524082

32.

Noble

LaCasa

(1991). The Hispanic way: Aspects of behavior, attitudes, and customs of the Spanish-speaking world. Passport Books.

33.

Novek

Menec

V. H.

(2014). Older adults’ perceptions of age-friendly communities in Canada: A photovoice study. Ageing and Society, 34(6), 1052. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1200150X

34.

Nylund

K. L.

Asparouhov

Muthén

B. O.

(2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396

35.

Oswald

Jopp

Rott

Wahl

H. W.

(2011). Is aging in place a resource for or risk to life satisfaction? The Gerontologist, 51(2), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq096

36.

Park

N. S.

Roff

L. L.

Sun

Parker

M. W.

Klemmack

D. L.

Sawyer

Allman

R. M.

(2010). Transportation difficulty of black and white rural older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464809335597

37.

Park

Han

Kim

Dunkle

R. E.

(2017). Aging in place of vulnerable older adults: Person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(11), 1327–1350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815617286

38.

Rémillard-Boilard

Buffel

Phillipson

(2021). Developing age-friendly cities and communities: Eleven case studies from around the world. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010133

39.

Rogers

W. A.

Ramadhani

W. A.

Harris

M. T.

(2020). Defining aging in place: The intersectionality of space, person, and time. Innovation in Aging, 4(4), igaa036. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa036

40.

Rowles

G. D.

(1983). Place and personal identity in old age: Observations from Appalachia. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(4), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80033-4

41.

Sixsmith

(2008). Ageing in place in the United Kingdom. Ageing International, 32(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-008-9019-y

42.

Thomas

Blanchard

(2009). Moving beyond place: Aging in community. Generations (san Francisco, Calif ), 33(2), 12–17.

43.

Trecartin

S. M.

Cummings

S. M.

(2018). Systematic review of the physical home environment and the relationship to psychological well-being among community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 61(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2018.1463339

44.

Vanleerberghe

De Witte

Claes

Schalock

R. L.

Verté

(2017). The quality of life of older people aging in place: A literature review. Quality of Life Research, 26(11), 2899–2907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1651-0

45.

Wiles

J. L.

Leibing

Guberman

Reeve

Allen

R. E.

(2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098

46.

World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43755