We examine age differences in the relationship between negative affect (NA) and different indicators of daily stress (interpersonal, health, and financial stressors and perceived stress). Participants completed 56 days of daily diary surveys from Wave 1 of the Notre Dame Study of Health & Well-being. Multi-level modeling allowed us to assess the within-person relationships between daily stress and NA and the cross-level interactions between these daily relationships and cross-sectional age. Each type of stress additively related to daily NA. Older age related to an exacerbated relationship between daily interpersonal stressors and NA, but a weaker relationship between daily perceived stress and NA. Interventions focused on enhancing daily well-being can encourage older adults to ensure they do not have overpacked schedules in regards to social relationships, and encourage midlife and younger adults to engage in activities that disrupt the link between perceived stress and NA.
AlmeidaD. M. (2005). Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00336.x
2.
BergemanC. S.BlaxtonJ.JoinerR. (2020). Dynamic systems, contextual influences, and multiple timescales: Emotion regulation as a resilience resource. The Gerontologist, 61(3), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa046
3.
BergemanC.S.BokerS.M.BonannoG.A.RoseN.SeemanT. (2021). Integrative science approach to resilience: The Notre Dame Study of Health & Well-being (NDHWB). Journal of Research in Human Development18(3), 164–180. Invited paper for a special issue. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2021.1964897
4.
BergemanC. S.DeboeckP. R. (2014). Trait stress resistance and dynamic stress dissipation on health and well-being: The reservoir model. Research in Human Development, 11(2), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2014.906736
5.
BlaxtonJ.BergemanC. S.WangL. (2018). Daily stress reactivity across the life span: Longitudinal and cross-sectional effects of age. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(3), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby046
6.
BlaxtonJ. M.BergemanC. S.WhiteheadB. R.BraunM. E.PayneJ. D. (2015). Relationships among nightly sleep quality, daily stress, and daily affect. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(3), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv060
7.
BonitoJ. A.RuppelE. K.KeytonJ. (2012). Reliability estimates for multilevel designs in group research. Small Group Research, 43(4), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412437614
8.
BroseA.SchmiedekF.LövdénM.LindenbergerU. (2011). Normal aging dampens the link between intrusive thoughts and negative affect in reaction to daily stressors. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022287
9.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
CharlesS. T.PiazzaJ. R.LuongG.AlmeidaD. M. (2009). Now you see it, now you don’t: Age differences in affective reactivity to social tensions. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016673
12.
CharlesS. T.PiazzaJ. R.MogleJ.SliwinskiM. J.AlmeidaD. M. (2013). The wear and tear of daily stressors on mental health. Psychological Science, 24(5), 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612462222
13.
CohenS.WilliamsonG. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the US. In SpacapamS.OskampS. (Eds.), The social psychology of health: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 31–67). Sage Publications, Inc.
14.
DiehlM.HayE. L. (2010). Risk and resilience factors in coping with daily stress in adulthood: The role of age, self-concept incoherence, and personal control. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1132–1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019937
15.
DiehlM.HayE. L.ChuiH. (2012). Chapter 13personal risk and resilience factors in the context of daily stress. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 32(1), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1891/0198–8794.32.251
16.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S.Dunkel-SchetterC.DeLongisA.GruenR. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992
17.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
18.
MontpetitM. A.BergemanC. S.DeboeckP. R.TiberioS. S.BokerS. M. (2010). Resilience-as-process: Negative affect, stress, and coupled dynamical systems. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019268
19.
MroczekD. K.AlmeidaD. M. (2004). The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00265.x
20.
NeubauerA. B.SmythJ. M.SliwinskiM. J. (2018). Age differences in proactive coping with minor hassles in daily life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby061
21.
NeupertS. D.AlmeidaD. M.CharlesS. T. (2007). Age differences in reactivity to daily stressors: The role of personal control. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(4), P216–P225. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.4.p216
22.
ParrishB. P.CohenL. H.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2011). Prospective relationship between negative affective reactivity to daily stress and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(3), 270–296. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.3.270
23.
PiazzaJ. R.StawskiR. S.ShefflerJ. L. (2019). Age, daily stress processes, and allostatic load: A longitudinal study. Journal of Aging and Health, 31(9), 1671–1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264318788493
24.
PutermanE.HaritatosJ.AdlerN. E.SidneyS.SchwartzJ. E.EpelE. S. (2013). Indirect effect of financial strain on daily cortisol output through daily negative to positive affect index in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(12), 2883–2889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.07.016
25.
ScottS. B.JacksonB. R.BergemanC. S. (2011). What contributes to perceived stress in later life? A recursive partitioning approach. Psychology and Aging, 26(4), 830–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023180
26.
ScottS. B.SliwinskiM. J.Blanchard-FieldsF. (2013). Age differences in emotional responses to daily stress: The role of timing, severity, and global perceived stress. Psychology and Aging, 28(4), 1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034000
27.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.
28.
SnippeE.DziakJ. J.LanzaS. T.NyklíčekI.WichersM. (2017). The shape of change in perceived stress, negative affect, and stress sensitivity during mindfulness-based stress reduction. Mindfulness, 8(3), 728–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0650-5
29.
StawskiR. S.ScottS. B.ZawadzkiM. J.SliwinskiM. J.Marcusson-ClavertzD.KimJ., …SmythJ. M. (2019). Age differences in everyday stressor-related negative affect: A coordinated analysis. Psychology and Aging, 34(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000309
30.
StawskiR. S.SliwinskiM. J.AlmeidaD. M.SmythJ. M. (2008). Reported exposure and emotional reactivity to daily stressors: The roles of adult age and global perceived stress. Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.52
31.
StefaniakA. R.BlaxtonJ. M.BergemanC. S. (2021). Age differences in types and perceptions of daily stress. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 94(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150211001588
32.
WangL.(Peggy), & MaxwellS. E. (2015). On disaggregating between-person and within-person effects with longitudinal data using multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000030
33.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
34.
WhiteheadB. R.BergemanC. S. (2013). Self-reported health bias: The role of daily affective valence and arousal. Psychology & Health, 28(7), 784–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.759224
35.
WhiteheadB. R.BlaxtonJ. M. (2017). Daily well-being benefits of physical activity in older adults: Does time or type matter?The Gerontologist, 57(6), 1062–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw250
36.
ZautraA. J.GuarnacciaC. A.DohrenwendB. P. (1986). Measuring small life events. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(6), 629–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00931340
37.
ZhangQ.WangL. (2014). Aggregating and testing intraindividual correlations: Methods and comparisons. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.870877
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
