This study aims to provide an empirical demonstration of a novel method, regression mixture model, by examining differential effects of somatic amplification to positive affect and identifying the predictors that contribute to the differential effects. Data derived from the second wave of Midlife in the United States. The analytic sample consisted of 1,766 adults aged from 33 to 84 years. Regression mixture models were fitted using Mplus 7.4, and a two-step model-building approach was adopted. Three latent groups were identified consisting of a maladaptive (32.1%), a vulnerable (62.5%), and a resilient (5.4%) group. Six covariates (i.e., age, education level, positive relations with others, purpose in life, depressive symptoms, and physical health) significantly predicted the latent class membership in the regression mixture model. The study demonstrated the regression mixture model to be a flexible and efficient statistical tool in assessing individual differences in response to adversity and identifying resilience factors, which contributes to aging research.
AhmadA. H.ZakariaR. (2015). Pain in times of stress. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 22(Spec Issue), 52–61.
2.
AlemidaD. M.WethingtonE.KesslerR. C. (2002). The daily inventory of stressful events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191102091006
3.
AlmeidaD. M. (2005). Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00336.x
4.
AlmeidaD. M.McgonagleK. (2009). Assessing daily stress processes in social surveys by combining stressor exposure and salivary cortisol. Biodemography and Social Biology, 55(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/19485560903382338
5.
BaltesM. M.CarstensenL. L. (2003). The process of successful aging: Selection, optimization, and compensation. In U. M.Staudinger & U.Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding human development (pp. 81−104). Boston, MA: Springer.
6.
BanksJBreezeECrawfordRDemakakosPOliveiraC. D.GjonçaE.GreenR.HusseyDKumariMLessofCMarmotM.McMunnAMurielA.NazrooJ.NunnS.OldfieldZ.ShankarA.StaffordM.SteptoeA., … ZaninottoP. (2010). Financial circumstances, health and well-being of the older population in England: The 2008 English longitudinal study of aging. Institute for Fiscal Studies
BarskyA. J.WyshakG.KlermanG.L. (1990). The somatosensory amplification scale and its relationship to hypochondriasis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 24(4), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(90)90004-A
9.
BoehmJ. K.ChenY.WilliamsD. R.RyffC.KubzanskyL. D. (2015). Unequally distributed psychological assets: Are there social disparities in optimism, life satisfaction, and positive affect. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0118066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0118066
10.
ChidaY.SteptoeA. (2008). Positive psychological well-being and mortality: A quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70(7), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818105ba
11.
ColesT.TanX.BennettA. V.SanoffH. K.BaschE.JensenR. E.ReeveB. B. (2018). Sleep quality in individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer: Factors associated with sleep disturbance as patients transition off treatment. Psycho-Oncology, 27(3), 1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4595
12.
CotterK. A.LachmanM. E. (2010). Psychosocial and behavioral contributors to health: Age-related increases in physical disability are reduced by physical fitness. Psychology & Health, 25(7), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440902883212
13.
CuñadoJ.de GraciaF. P. (2012). Does education affect happiness? Evidence for Spain. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9874-x
14.
DaeppenJ.FaouziM.SanglierT.SanchezN.CosteF.BertholetN. (2013). Drinking patterns and their predictive factors in control: A 12-month prospective study in a sample of alcohol-dependent patients initiating treatment. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 48(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/ags125
15.
DavidsonK.W.MostofskyE.WhangW. (2010). Don’t worry, be happy: Positive affect and reduced 10-year incident coronary heart disease: The Canadian Nova Scotia health survey. European Heart Journal, 31(9), 1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp603
16.
DesarboW. S.JedidiK.SinhaI. (2001). Customer value analysis in a heterogeneous market. Strategic Management Journal, 22(9), 845–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.191
17.
DziakJ. J.CoffmanD. L.LanzaS. T.LiR.JermiinL. S. (2020). Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 21(2): 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz016
18.
ElkinsL. E.PollinaD. A.SchefferS. R.KruppL. B. (1999). Psychological states and neuropsychological performances in chronic Lyme disease. Applied Neuropsychology, 6(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324826an0601_3
19.
FaganA. A.HornM. L.DavidH. J.JakiT. (2013). Differential effects of parental controls on adolescent substance use: For whom is the family most important? (Report). Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-012-9183-9
FriedmanE. M.RyffC. D. (2012). Living well with medical comorbidities: A biopsychosocial perspective. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(5), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr152
22.
GattenC. W.BrookingsJ. B.BoltonB. (1993). Mood fluctuations in female multiple sclerosis patients. Social Behavior & Personality, 21(2), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1993.21.2.103
23.
GeorgeM. R.YangN.Van HornM. L.SmithJ.JakiT.FeasterD.MasynK.HoweG. (2013). Using regression mixture models with non-normal data: Examining an ordered polytomous approach. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 83(4), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2011.636363
24.
GrootscholtenC.LigtenbergG.DerksenR. H. W. M.SchreursK. M. G.de Glas-VosJ. W.HagenE. C. van den Wall BakeA. W. L., HuizingaT. W. J.van den HoogenF. H. J.BijIM. van HouwelingenJ. C. SnoekF. J.BerdenJ. H. M. (2003). Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Development and validation of a lupus specific symptom checklist. Quality of Life Research, 12(6), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025176407776
25.
GrzywaczJ. G.AlmeidaD. M.NeupertS. D.EttnerS. L. (2004). Socioeconomic status and health: A micro-level analysis of exposure and vulnerability to daily stressors. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 45(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650404500101
26.
HansenT.SlagsvoldB. (2012). The age and subjective well-being paradox revisited: A multidimensional perspective. Norsk Epidemiologi, 22(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v22i2.1565
27.
Health and Retirement Study. (2008). Sample size and response rate 2002 and beyond. HRS Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.
28.
HillP. L.SinN. L.TurianoN. A.BurrowA. L.AlmeidaD. M. (2018). Sense of purpose moderates the associations between daily stressors and daily well-being. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52(8), 724–729. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax039
29.
HittnerE. F.StephensJ. E.TurianoN. A.GerstorfD.LachmanM. E.HaaseC. M. (2020). Positive affect is associated with less memory decline: Evidence from a 9-year longitudinal study. Psychological Science, 31(11), 1386–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620953883
30.
HuxholdO.MicheM.SchüzB. (2014). Benefits of having friends in older ages: Differential effects of informal social activities on well-being in middle-aged and older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(3), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt029
31.
IshiiK. (2019). Cultural influences in somatosensory amplification and their association with negative affective states. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12342
32.
JakiT.KimM.LamontA.GeorgeM.ChangC.FeasterD.Van HornM. L. (2019). The effects of sample size on the estimation of regression mixture models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(2), 358–384. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0013164418791673
33.
KeyesC. L. M.ShmotkinD.RyffC. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
34.
KeyesC. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 539 −548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539
35.
KimM.Van HornM. L.JakiT.VermuntJ.FeasterD.LichsteinK. L.TaylorD. J.RiedelB. W.BushA. J. (2020). Repeated measures regression mixture models. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01257-7
36.
KimM.VermuntJ.BakkZ.JakiT.VanH. M. L. (2016). Modeling predictors of latent classes in regression mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(4), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1158655
37.
KötelesF., & SimorP. (2014). Somatic symptoms and holistic thinking as major dimensions behind modern health worries. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(5), 869–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9363-5
LevensonR. W.CarstensenL. L.GottmanJ. M. (1994). Influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.56
41.
LubkeG.H.MuthénB. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
42.
LutharS. S.CicchettiD.BeckerB. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
43.
LyubomirskyS.KingL.DienerE. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
44.
ManciniJ. A.BliesznerR. (1989). Aging parents and adult children: Research themes in intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/352492
45.
McKnightP. E.KashdanT. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017152
MorozinkJ. A.FriedmanE. M.CoeC. L.RyffC. D. (2010). Socioeconomic and psychosocial predictors of interleukin-6 in the MIDUS national sample. Health Psychology, 29(6), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021360
48.
MroczekD. K.KolarzC. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1333
49.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
50.
NakaoM.TakeuchiT. (2018). Alexithymia and somatosensory amplification link perceived psychosocial stress and somatic symptoms in outpatients with psychosomatic illness. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7050112
OngA. D.BergemanC. S.ReidM. C. (2020). Positive affect as source of resilience in adulthood and later life. In A. V.Wister & T. D.Cosco (Eds.), Resilience and aging (pp. 137–156). Springer International Publishing.
53.
PillayD. (2020). Positive affect and mindfulness as predictors of resilience amongst women leaders in higher education institutions. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(1), 1–10. 10.4102/sajhrm.v18i0.1260
PressmanS. D.JenkinsB. N.MoskowitzJ. T. (2019). Positive affect and health: What do we know and where next should we go?. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102955
56.
QuandtR. E. (1972). A new approach to estimating switching regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67(338), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10482378
57.
RamseyM. A.GentzlerA. L. (2015). An upward spiral: Bidirectional associations between positive affect and positive aspects of close relationships across the life span. Developmental Review, 36, 58–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.01.003
58.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A.ChangC. (2016). Examining population heterogeneity in finite mixture settings using latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(5), 726–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1103193
59.
RyffC.AlmeidaD. M.AyanianJ. S.CarrD. S.ClearyP. D.CoeC.WilliamsD. (2007). Midlife development in the United States (MIDUS II), 2004–2006. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
60.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
61.
RyffC. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
62.
RyffC. D.AlmeidaD. M. (2017). Midlife in the United States (MIDUS 2): Daily stress project, 2004–2009. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26841.v2
63.
RyffC. D.FriedmanE.Fuller-RowellT.LoveG.MorozinkJ.RadlerB.TsenkovaV.MiyamotoY. (2012). Varieties of resilience in MIDUS. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(11), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00462.x
64.
RyffC. D.KitayamS.KarasawaM.MarkusH.KawakamiN.CoeC. (2018). Survey of midlife in Japan (MIDJA), April–September 2008. ICPSR30822-v3. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
65.
SarstedtM. (2008). Market segmentation with mixture regression models: Understanding measures that guide model selection. Journal of Targeting, Measurement & Analysis for Marketing, 16(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2008.9
66.
SchmiegeS. J.MeekP.BryanA. D.PetersenH. (2012). Latent variable mixture modeling: A flexible statistical approach for identifying and classifying heterogeneity. Nursing Research, 61(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182539f4c
ScloveS. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360
69.
SewellW. H.HauserR. M.SpringerK. W.HauserT. S. (2004). As we age: The Wisconsin longitudinal study, 1957–2001. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 20, 3–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0276-5624(03)20001-9
70.
ShookN. J.FordC.StroughJ.DelaneyR.BarkerD. (2017). In the moment and feeling good: Age differences in mindfulness and positive affect. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(4), 338. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000139
71.
SilinskasG.KiuruN.TolvanenA.NiemiP.LerkkanenM.-K.NurmiJ.-E. (2013). Maternal teaching of reading and children’s reading skills in grade 1: Patterns and predictors of positive and negative associations. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.06.011
72.
SinN. L.MoskowitzJ. T.WhooleyM. A. (2015). Positive affect and health behaviors across 5 years in patients with coronary heart disease: The heart and soul study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77(9), 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000238
73.
SirgyM. J. (2021). Positive outcomes of wellbeing. In M. J.Sirgy (Ed.), The psychology of quality of life (pp. 59–78). Springer International Publishing.
74.
SteptoeA.LeighE. S.KumariM. (2011). Positive affect and distressed affect over the day in older people. Psychology and Aging, 26(4), 956. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023303
SurachmanA.WardeckerB.ChowS. M.AlmeidaD. (2019). Life course socioeconomic status, daily stressors, and daily well-being: Examining chain of risk models. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74(1), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby014
77.
Van HornM. L.JakiT.MasynK.HoweG.FeasterD. J.LamontA. E., GeorgeM. R. W., & KimM. (2015). Evaluating differential effects using regression interactions and regression mixture models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(4), 677–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414554931
78.
Van HornM. L.SmithJ.FaganA.JakiT.MaysnK.HawkinsD.FeasterD.HoweG. (2012). Not quite normal: Consequences of violating the assumption of normality with regression mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.659622
79.
VermuntJ.K. (2010). Mixture models for multilevel data. In HoxJ. and RobertsJ.K. (Eds.), Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 59–81). Routledge.
80.
WongJ. D.ShoboY. (2017). The influences of daily stressors on morning cortisol levels in midlife and older retirees: The moderating roles of age and gender. Journal of Aging and Health, 29(5), 858–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264316645551
81.
World Health Organization. (2015). World report on aging and health. WHO. ISBN: 9789241565042
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
