High level of preferences for routines is an indicator of psychological vulnerability in older adults. However, the psychometric properties of the Preferences for Routines Scale (PRS) initially validated in a small selected sample of older adults revealed a low Cronbach’s α (.50) in the general elderly population. The present study aims to improve the PRS using the data from the “AMI” and “PAQUID” population-based studies. Among 718 older persons, the most discriminative items are identified using item response theory methodology. A short form of the PRS (PRS-S) included five of the ten items of the original scale and showed improved internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The factors associated with the PRS-S are similar to those found in previous studies. Norms are provided according to gender and educational level. The reduction of the number of items tends to facilitate its administration and promote its use in both clinical and epidemiologic research contexts.
AndresenE. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12 Suppl 2), S15–S20.doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.20619http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11128900
BaltesP. B.SmithJ. (2003). New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology, 49(2), 123–135.doi:10.1159/000067946http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12574672
4.
Barberger-GateauP.FabrigouleC.HelmerC.RouchI.DartiguesJ. F. (1999). Functional impairment in instrumental activities of daily living: An early clinical sign of dementia?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47(4), 456–462.doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb07239.xhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10203122
5.
BennettK. M. (1998). Longitudinal changes in mental and physical health among elderly, recently widowed men. Mortality, 3(3), 265–273.doi:10.1080/713685953
6.
BerguaV.BouissonJ.DartiguesJ. -F.SwendsenJ.FabrigouleC.PérèsK.Barberger-GateauP. (2013). Restriction in instrumental activities of daily living in older persons: Association with preferences for routines and psychological vulnerability. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 77(4), 309–329.doi:10.2190/AG.77.4.chttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24547615
7.
BerguaV.DartiguesJ. -F.BouissonJ. (2012). Routinization profiles in elderly persons: Between adaptation and vulnerability. European Review of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 183–189.
8.
BerguaV.FabrigouleC.Barberger-GateauP.DartiguesJ. -F.SwendsenJ.BouissonJ. (2006). Preferences for routines in older people: Associations with cognitive and psychological vulnerability. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(10), 990–998.doi:10.1002/gps.1597http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16955425
9.
BerguaV.MeillonC.PotvinO.BouissonJ.Le GoffM.RouaudO.RitchieK.DartiguesJ.-F.AmievaH. (2012). The STAI-Y trait scale: Psychometric properties and normative data from a large population-based study of elderly people. International Psychogeriatrics, 24(7), 1163–1171.doi:10.1017/S104161021200030022436140
10.
BouissonJ. (2002). Routinization preferences, anxiety, and depression in an elderly French sample. Journal of Aging Studies, 16(3), 295–302.doi:10.1016/S0890-4065(02)00051-8
11.
BouissonJ.SwendsenJ. (2003). Routinization and emotional well-being: An experience sampling investigation in an elderly French sample. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(5), P280–P282.doi:10.1093/geronb/58.5.P280
12.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258.doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
13.
Bruchon-SchweitzerM.-L.PaulhanI. (1993). Manual for the State-Trait anxiety inventory, STAI (French Edition: Editions de Centre de Psychologie Appliquée). Consulting Psychologist Press.
14.
ChoiS. W.GibbonsL. E.CraneP. K. (2011). lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic Regression/Item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(8), 1–30.doi:10.18637/jss.v039.i08http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21572908
15.
DartiguesJ. F.GagnonM.Barberger-GateauP.LetenneurL.CommengesD.SauvelC.MichelP.SalamonR. (1992). The PAQUID epidemiological program on brain ageing. Neuroepidemiology, 11(Suppl 1), 14–18.doi:10.1159/000110955http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1603241
FleissJ. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley.
18.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research, 12(3), 189–198.doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1202204
19.
FuhrerR.RouillonF. (1989). Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale– French validation. La Version Française de l’échelle CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Description et Traduction de l’échelle d’autoévaluation, 4, 163–166.
IsaacsB.AkhtarA. J. (1972). The set test: A rapid test of mental function in old people. Age and Ageing, 1(4), 222–226.doi:10.1093/ageing/1.4.222http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4669878
22.
KatzS. (1983). Assessing self-maintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 31(12), 721–727.doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb03391.xhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6418786
23.
KennyD. A.KaniskanB.McCoachD. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507.doi:10.1177/0049124114543236
24.
LawtonM. P.BrodyE. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179–186.doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5349366
25.
McKinleyR. L.MillsC. N. (1985). A comparison of several goodness-of-fit statistics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(1), 49–57.doi:10.1177/014662168500900105
26.
NaefR.WardR.Mahrer-ImhofR.GrandeG. (2013). Characteristics of the bereavement experience of older persons after spousal loss: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(8), 1108–1121.doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.026http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23273923
27.
PérèsK.MatharanF.AllardM.AmievaH.BaldiI.Barberger-GateauP.BerguaV.Bourdel-MarchassonI.DelcourtC.Foubert-SamierA.Fourrier-RéglatA.GaimardM.LaberonS.MaubaretC.PostalV.ChantalC.RainfrayM.RascleN.DartiguesJ. -F. (2012). Health and aging in elderly farmers: The AMI cohort. BMC Public Health, 12, 558.doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-558http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22839764
28.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.
29.
ReeveB. BHaysR. DBjornerJ. BCookK. FCraneP. KTeresiJ. AThissenDRevickiD. AWeissD. JHambletonR. KLiuHGershonRReiseS. PLaiJ.-SCellaDPROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22–31.doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443115
30.
ReichJ. W.ZautraA. J. (1991). Analyzing the trait of routinization in older adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 32(3), 161–180.doi:10.2190/4PKR-F87M-UXEQ-R5J2http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1829438
31.
ReiseS. P.RevickiD. A.. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of item response theory modeling: Applications to typical performance assessment (1st ed.). Routledge.
32.
RosowI.BreslauN. (1966). A Guttman health scale for the aged. Journal of Gerontology, 21(4), 556–559.doi:10.1093/geronj/21.4.556http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5918309
33.
RoystonP.AltmanD. G. (1994). Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: Parsimonious parametric modelling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 43(3), 429–467JSTOR.
34.
SamejimaF. (1997). Graded response model. Invan der LindenW. J.HambletonR. K. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer-Verlag. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387946610.
ThomasM. L. (2011). The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: A review. Assessment, 18(3), 291–307.doi:10.1177/1073191110374797http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20644081
37.
TournierI.MatheyS.PostalV. (2012). The association between routinization and cognitive resources in later life. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 74(2), 143–161.doi:10.2190/AG.74.2.chttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808624
38.
WechslerD. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler adult intelligence scale, Revised. Psychological Corporation.
39.
ZisbergA.ZysbergL.YoungH. M.ScheppK. G. (2009). Trait routinization, functional and cognitive status in older adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 69(1), 17–29.doi:10.2190/AG.69.1.bhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19803338
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
