This study was designed to validate the newly developed Filial Piety Scale for Chinese Elders (FPSCE) in measuring elders’ filial norms in contemporary China by administering questionnaire survey with 521 elders aged 70 years and older in Beijing, China. Validity and reliability tests were applied. Through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, a conceptually meaningful three-factor model with 12 items was obtained, consisting of “caring for parents,” “familial entirety,” and “familial aspiration.” The FPSCE showed good internal consistency, satisfactory discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, and significant correlations for some variables related to demographic characteristics, health status, and financial condition. The construction of the FPSCE indicates that elders’ understanding of filial piety and their expectation of their children may have changed. The FPSCE shows that contemporary elders in China hold less authoritative but more reciprocal stances toward filial piety. The FPSCE can be used to advance the contextualized understanding of filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies, to help facilitate the development of family-friendly policies in aging societies, and to meet the challenges associated with an accelerating aging population.
BeaversA. S.LounsburyJ. W.RichardsJ. K.HuckS. W.SkolitsG. J.EsquivelS. L. (2013).
Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,
18, 1-13. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=18&n=6
2.
ByrneB. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
3.
CattellR. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis.
New York, NY:
Plenum.
4.
ChenF.LiuG. (2009). Population aging in China. In UhlenbergP. (Ed.), International handbook of population aging (pp. 157–172).
Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
Springer.
5.
ChengS.T.ChanA. C. M. (2006).
Filial piety and psychological well-being in well older Chinese. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,
61B(5), 262–269.
6.
CheungC. K.KwanA. Y. H.NgS. H. (2006).
Impacts of filial piety on preference for kinship versus public care. Journal of Community Psychology,
5, 617–634.
7.
ChiuH. F. K.LeeH. C.KwongP. K. (1994).
Reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of mini-mental state examination—A preliminary study. Journal of Hong Kong College of Psychiatry,
4(SP2), 25–28.
8.
ChowN. (2006).
The practice of filial piety and its impact on long-term care policies for elderly people in Asian Chinese communities. Asian Journal of Gerontology & Geriatrics,
1, 31–35.
9.
ChowN. W. S. (1999).
Diminishing filial piety and the changing role and status of the elders in Hong Kong.Hallym International Journal of Aging,
1, 67–77.
10.
ChowN. W. S. (2001). The practice of filial piety among the Chinese in Hong Kong. In ChiI.ChappellN. L.LubbenJ. (Eds.), Elderly Chinese in pacific rim countries: Social support and integration (pp. 125–136).
Hong Kong:
Hong Kong University Press.
11.
ChowN. W. S.LumT. Y. (2008). Trends in family attitudes and values in Hong Kong.
Hong Kong:
Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong.
12.
DuP. (2013).
Intergenerational solidarity and old-age support for the social inclusion of elders in Mainland China: The changing roles of family and government.Ageing and Society,
33, 44–63.
13.
FanR. (2006).
Confucian filial piety and long term care for aged parents.HEC Forum,
18(1), 1–17.
14.
FunkL. M.ChappellN. L.LiuG. (2013).
Associations between filial responsibility and caregiver well-being: Are there differences by cultural group?Research on Aging,
35, 78–95.
15.
GalloisC.GilesH.OtaH.PiersonH. D.NgS. H.LimT. S.HarwoodJ. (1996). Intergenerational communication across the pacific rim: The impact of filial piety. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
16.
GuS.LiangJ. (2000). China: Population aging and old age support. In BengtsonV. L.KimD. D.EunK. S. (Eds.), Aging in East and West: Families, states, and elderly (pp. 59–94).
New York, NY:
Springer.
17.
HoD. Y. F. (1994).
Filial piety, authoritarian moralism, and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs,
120, 347–365.
18.
HoD. Y. F. (1996). Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In BondM. H. (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 155–165).
Hong Kong:
Oxford University Press.
19.
HouldinA. D. (2007).
A qualitative study of caregivers’ experiences with newly diagnosed advanced colorectal cancer.Oncology Nursing Forum,
34, 323–330.
20.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999).
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,
6, 1–55.
21.
HuiE.ChiM. (2009).
Residential mobility and aging population in Hong Kong.Habitat International,
33, 10–14.
22.
KaiserH. (1974).
An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,
39, 31–36.
23.
KhalailaR. (2010).
Development and evaluation of the Arabic filial piety scale.Research on Social Work Practice,
20(4), 356–367.
24.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.).
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
25.
KwanA. Y. H.CheungJ. C. K.NgS. H. (2003). Revisit of the filial piety concept among the young, the adult, and the old in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Nanjing, Shanghai, Xiamen, and Xian: Research report (Doctoral thesis). City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
26.
LaiD. W. L. (2010).
Filial piety, caregiving appraisal, and caregiving burden.Research on Aging,
32, 200–223.
27.
LakosW. (2010). Chinese ancestor worship: A practice and ritual oriented approach to understanding Chinese culture.
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
28.
LawtonM.BrodyE. (1969).
Assessing of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.The Gerontologist,
9, 179–186.
29.
LeeW. K. M.KwokH. K. (2005).
Differences in expectations and patterns of informal support for older persons in Hong Kong: Modification to filial piety.Ageing International,
30, 188–206.
30.
LinM. H.ChouM. Y.LiangC. K.PengL. N.ChenL. K. (2010).
Population aging and its impacts: Strategies of the health-care system in Taipei.Ageing Research Reviews,
9, S23–S27.
31.
LiuJ. H.NgS. H.WeatherallA.LoongC. (2000).
Filial piety, acculturation, and intergeneration communication among New Zealand Chinese.Basic & Applied Social Psychology,
22, 213–223.
32.
LouV. W. Q.ChiI.Mjelde-MosseyL. A. (2008).
Development and validation of a life satisfaction scale for Chinese elders.Aging and Human Development,
67(2), 149–170.
33.
LowensteinA.KatzR.Gur-YaishN. (2007).
Reciprocity in parent–child exchange and life satisfaction among the elderly: A cross-national perspective.Journal of Social Issues,
63(4), 865–883. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00541.x.
34.
LumT. Y.YanE. C.HoA. H.ShumM. H.WongG. H.LauM. M.WangJ. (2015).
Measuring filial piety in the 21st century: Development, factor structure, and reliability of the 10-item contemporary filial piety scale. Journal of Applied Gerontology,
11, 1235–1247. doi:10.1177/0733464815570664.
35.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996).
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.Psychological Methods,
1, 130–149.
36.
Mjelde-Mossey, L. A., Chi, I., & Lou, V. W. Q. (2005). Assessing tradition in Chinese elders living in a changing social environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 11(3-4), 41-57.
37.
NgA. C. Y.PhillipsD. R.LeeW. K. (2002).
Persistence and challenges to filial piety and informal support of older persons in a modern Chinese society: A case study in Tuen Mun, Hong Kong. Journal of Aging Studies,
16, 135–153.
38.
Schonrock-AdemaJ.Heijne-PenningaM.Van HellE. A.Cohen-SchotanusJ. (2009).
Necessary steps in factor analysis: Enhancing validation studies of educational instruments. Medical Teacher,
31, 226–232.
39.
SilversteinM.ConroyS.WangH.GiarrussoR.BengtsonV. (2002).
Reciprocity in parent-child relations over the adult life course.Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,
57b(1), S3.
40.
SongL.LiS.FeldmanM. W. (2012).
Out-migration of young adults and gender division of intergenerational support in rural China. Research on Aging,
34, 399–424.
41.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2001). Using multivariate statistics.
Needham Heights, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
42.
Tang, Y. (2006). Obligation of Filial Piety, Adult Child Caregiver Burden, Received Social Support and Psychological Wellbeing of Adult Child Caregivers for Frail Elderly in Guangzhou, China (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
43.
TangC. S.WuA. M. S.YeungD.YanE. (2009).
Attitudes and intention toward old age home placement: A study of young adult, middle-aged, and older Chinese.Ageing International,
34(4), 237–251.
44.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T.OwenS. V. (2007).
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.Research in Nursing & Health,
30, 459–467.
45.
RubinA.BabbieE. (2015). Essential research methods for social work.
Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.
46.
VasunilashornS.SteinmanB. A.LiebigP. S.PynoosJ. (2012).
Aging in place: Evolution of a research topic whose time has come.Journal of Aging Research,
2012, 6. doi:10.1155/2012/120952
47.
WallaceM.ShelkeyM. (2008).
Monitoring functional status in hospitalized older adults. The American Journal of Nursing,
4, 64–72.
48.
Wang, D. (2004). New filial piety culture and its functions. Population Research, 28, 76–81 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6087.2004.03.011
49.
WuM. L. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Operation and application of AMOS.
Chongqing, China:
Chongqing University Press.
50.
YehK. H. (1997). Changes in the Taiwanese people’s concept of filial piety. In ChengL. Y.LuY. H.WangF. C. (Eds.), Taiwanese society in the 1990s (pp. 171–214).
Taipei, Taiwan:
Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica (in Chinese).
51.
Yeh, K. H. (2003). The beneficial and harmful effects of filial piety: An integrative analysis. In: K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, P. B. Pederson & I. Daibo (Eds.), Asian Social Psychology: Conceptual and Empirical Contributions (pp. 67–82). Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
52.
YehK. H.BedfordO. (2003).
A test of the dual filial piety model.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,
6, 215–228.
53.
YehK. H.YiC.-C.TsaoW. C.WanP. S. (2013).
Filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies: A comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China.International Sociology,
28, 277–296.
54.
YiQ. C.ZhangY. H. (2008). Continuance and transition of patriarchal family: Sociological research on families in Taiwan. In XieG. X. (Eds.), Interlocution: A thematic history of Taiwanese sociology (pp. 1–40).
Taipei, Taiwan:
Socio Publishing (in Chinese).
55.
ZhanH. J.LiuG.GuanX. (2006).
Willingness and availability: Explaining new attitudes toward institutional elder care among Chinese elderly parents and their adult children.Journal of Aging Studies,
20, 279–290.
56.
ZhangE. (2010).
Community, the common good, and public healthcare—Confucianism and its relevance to contemporary China.Public Health Ethics,
3(3), 259–266.
