Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives

High rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been observed in earthquake survivors many years after the event. However, its prevalence among patients with schizophrenia is largely unknown. This study, which was conducted two years after the 2020 Elazığ earthquake, sought to identify risk factors for earthquake-related PTSD among patients with schizophrenia and healthy subjects.

Methods

Adult patients with schizophrenia (N = 103) and healthy subjects (N = 103) who had survived the earthquake were recruited from affected areas in the Eastern Anatolian Region of Turkey, Elazığ. A detailed questionnaire of earthquake-related risk factors, the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief COPE), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and the Clinician-Administered PTSD scale for DSM-V (CAPS-5) scale were administered to participants.

Results

Twelve percent of the patients with schizophrenia and 25% of the healthy subjects had earthquake-related PTSD diagnoses two years after the 2020 Elazığ earthquake. Healthy subjects had a significantly higher rate of earthquake-related PTSD when compared to patients with schizophrenia. Religious coping, self-blaming, less emotional support seeking, and going to a safer place on the night of the earthquake were found to be associated with PTSD in patients with schizophrenia. History of traumatic events, self-blaming, and less social support from family were found to be associated with a PTSD diagnosis in healthy subjects.

Conclusions

The earthquake in Turkey created a situation such that significant symptoms of PTSD remained present at two years following the event in both patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and healthy subjects. Patients with schizophrenia have different risk factors for the development of PTSD when compared with healthy subjects. Clinical interventions should consider risk factors, coping strategies, and perceived social support when seeking to prevent earthquake-related PTSD.

Keywords

post-traumatic stress disorder earthquake-related PTSD schizophrenia earthquake coping strategies perceived social support

Introduction

Earthquakes are highly uncontrolled and unpredictable disasters that can cause widespread devastation. Turkey is located on the Alpine-Himalayan seismic zone, which is one of the most active seismic zones in the world, and the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), which is one of the most important fault systems in and around Turkey.¹ An earthquake with a magnitude of 6.8 Mw and a depth of 8.6 km, reported by the Turkey Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, occurred on January 24, 2020, at 20:55 local time in the Sivrice district of Elazığ province (latitude: 38.36 and longitude: 39.06), located in the EAFZ (according to the European-Mediterranean Seismological Center-France, it had a magnitude of 6.8 Mw, and a depth of 15.0 km).² Elazığ province is located in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. The epicenter of the earthquake, the village of Çevrimtaş, is located approximately 35 km southwest of the city center of Elazığ. After the first earthquake in Elazığ, on 24 January, 4322 aftershocks with magnitudes ranging from 0.8 to 5.4 Mw occurred. 30 of the aftershocks were of magnitude 4 and above. The earthquake lasted for 22 seconds. This earthquake, in which 41 people died, and 1466 people were injured, affected a wide geographical area and was felt in many surrounding cities.³

Disasters cause short and long-term impacts on social, economic, political, physical, and psychological conditions.⁴ While other problems are addressed subsequently, many of the psychological problems remain undetected.⁵ Sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are among the most common psychiatric disorders in earthquake survivors. PTSD can develop following exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violation and is characterized by symptoms such as re-experiencing, avoidance, emotional and cognitive distortions, and hyperarousal.⁶ The prevalence of PTSD following exposure to earthquakes varies in the literature. The prevalence of PTSD in survivors was found to be 49.6% two years after the Spitak earthquake in Armenia.⁷ In a study conducted 20 months after the 1999 Marmara earthquake in Turkey, the prevalence of PTSD was found to be 39%.⁸ Two years after the earthquake in Central Italy, the prevalence of PTSD was 21.7%.⁹ This variability may be caused by the time elapsed since the disaster, the population considered, and the study design. Very little research examining the psychological impacts of earthquakes in patients with schizophrenia has been carried out compared to research on the general population. Several studies found increasing acute exacerbation rates in patients with schizophrenia after the earthquakes.^10,11 There is, however, a research gap on earthquake-related PTSD in patients with schizophrenia. Despite the well-known association between PTSD and schizophrenia, to our knowledge, there has been no research on the long-term psychological effects of earthquakes in patients with schizophrenia.

Responses to disasters show striking individual variation, which may be shaped by coping strategies. Maladaptive coping strategies are associated with a greater likelihood of PTSD.^12,13 Cofini et al.¹⁴ found that individuals with PTSD scored more on religious coping, self-distraction, self-blaming, denial, venting, and behavioral disengagement after the year 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. The lower level of perceived social support is one of the most important risk factors for the onset and maintenance of PTSD symptoms.¹⁵ In a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies, Wang et al.¹⁶ showed that higher social support provides a buffer against the development of PTSD. In the wake of the disaster, evaluating social support and intervening to improve it could help to prevent PTSD among patients with schizophrenia.¹⁷

Immense emotional suffering and physical devastation due to the earthquake caused a lingering effect on the mental health of the whole population.¹⁸ Inadequate investigation of the earthquake-related PTSD symptoms in patients with schizophrenia may cause untreated PTSD and more resistant psychotic symptoms. Our aim in this study is to assess the prevalence of PTSD and its association with perceived social support, and coping strategies in patients with schizophrenia and healthy subjects two years after experiencing the 2020 Elazığ earthquake.

Methods

Participants and procedure

A descriptive, cross-sectional research design was used to evaluate the PTSD diagnosis, coping strategies, and perceived social support among the survivors of the 2020 Elazığ earthquake. In total, 103 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and 103 adult respondents without any psychiatric diagnosis were assessed two years after the earthquake. The clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia was made by experienced psychiatrists through clinical interviews following the DSM-V criteria.¹⁹ Patients were recruited from the outpatient clinic of Elazığ Mental Health and Disease Hospital. All of the patients with schizophrenia were in antipsychotic treatment. Data were collected from symptomatically remitted patients with schizophrenia, which were determined to comply with Andreasen's remission criteria.²⁰ According to this remission criteria, four core positive and four core negative symptoms on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale ( PANSS ) have to be no more than mild at least for 6 months.^20,21 In addition, 103 adult respondents, without any psychiatric diagnosis before the interview date, who experienced the earthquake at the Elazığ city center, matched by age and sex, were recruited at the same time. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) 18–65 years of age; and 2) being mentally competent to answer the face-to-face interview questions. Exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) patients with dementia, mental retardation, or substance abuse; 2) history of severe head trauma, epilepsy or other neurological disorder; and 3) comorbid psychiatric disorder.

The respondents were interviewed about the 2020 Elazığ earthquake in detail. Sociodemographic characteristics and earthquake-related characteristics were assessed by clinicians using a standard interview questionnaire, which was developed by the research team specifically for this study after an extensive literature review on the earthquake, other natural disasters, and PTSD. We ascertained the respondents’ reactions immediately after the earthquake and the middle and long-term effects of the earthquake. We investigated the traumatic event history of respondents by using the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5) and determined traumatic events which had been experienced personally.²² Earthquake-related PTSD was measured using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5), a version of which was developed in Turkish.^23,24

Informed verbal and written consent was obtained from respondents before the interview. The average time taken for the interview was about 90–120 min. Data were collected from January 1, 2022, to February 1, 2022. The respondents were assured of the confidentiality of their data and responses. The study was approved by the Non-Invasive Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey (2021/09–35).

Measurements

Information from the day of the earthquake, earthquake-related events, clinical, and sociodemographic data were collected with a detailed clinical interview. The clinical interviews were conducted by licensed psychiatrists with extensive training and experience in diagnosing and treating psychiatric disorders. During the interviews, the psychiatrists used open-ended questions and follow-up probes to elicit information about the patient’s symptoms, history, and the earthquake day. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5), Brief COPE scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were used for clinical assessments.

Brief coping orientation to problems experienced

The “Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE)” scale, developed by Carver et al.,²⁵ measures the different coping strategies that individuals exhibit for stress. Carver et al. ²⁶ arranged a short version of the COPE scale named “Brief COPE Scale”, which is made up of 28 items, and 14 subscales. This self-report scale consists of four Likert-type questions. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Bacanlı et al.²⁷ Coping strategies could be analyzed under two main groups: adaptive (active coping, planning, positive reframing, use of instrumental support, use of emotional support, acceptance, religious coping, and humor) and maladaptive strategies (denial, behavioral disengagement, self-distraction, venting, substance use, and self-blame).²⁸

Multidimensional scale of perceived social support

The MSPSS was developed by Zimet et al.,²⁹ and assesses three sources of perceived social support: family, friends, and significant others. This scale consists of 12 items and contains seven Likert-type questions. It contains four items for each support group. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Eker and Arkar.³⁰

Clinician-administered PTSD scale for DSM-5

CAPS was developed in 1989 at the National Center for PTSD.³¹ CAPS was revised to correspond with PTSD criteria in the DSM-5 by Weathers et al.²⁴ The CAPS-5 is a 30-item structured interview that corresponds to the DSM-5 criteria for PTSD. The CAPS-5 items are evaluated in terms of intensity and frequency of symptoms and provide a single severity rating. The total symptom severity score is calculated by summing severity scores for items 1-20. Items were rated on five Likert-type questions with rating scale descriptors as “0 = absent”, “1 = mild/subthreshold”, “2 = moderate/threshold”, “3 = severe/markedly elevated”, and “4 = extreme/incapacitating”. A symptom is considered present only if the corresponding item severity score is rated 2 = moderate/threshold or higher. Criterion B (Intrusions) (items 1–5), Criterion C (avoidance) (items 6–7), Criterion D (negative alterations in mood and cognitions) (items 8–14), and Criterion E (arousal/ reactivity) (items 15–20) clusters were evaluated. A diagnosis of PTSD was made with the presence of at least one of five re-experiencing symptoms, one of two avoidance symptoms, two of seven symptoms of negative alterations in cognition, and mood, and two of six arousal symptoms for more than one month. Additionally, DSM-5 Criterion G should be met for PTSD diagnosis. Criterion G requires that the disturbance causes either clinically significant distress or functional impairment, as indicated by a rating of 2 = moderate or higher on items 23-25.^32,33 The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Boysan et al.²³

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted with the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 21.0. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine whether the data were normally distributed. The Chi-square test was used to compare the categorical data between the two groups. The Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was performed to analyze the relationship between PTSD diagnosis and the sociodemographic, earthquake-related variables, social support, and coping strategies. A binominal logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between clinical and earthquake-related factors, and the diagnosis of PTSD. Clinical and earthquake-related factors, which were those with statistical significance in univariate analyses for both groups, were used as independent variables. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used for model fit. For all statistical analyses, a statistical significance level of P < .05 was used.

Results

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants

The overall mean age of the healthy subjects and patients with schizophrenia was 41.0 ± 8.1 years and 43.1 ± 8.0 years, respectively. For both groups, 55% of the subjects were male. Healthy subjects significantly had spent a longer duration in education when compared with patients with schizophrenia (P < .001). The marriage rate was significantly lower in patients with schizophrenia (P < .001), while 24% of the patients with schizophrenia and 33% of the healthy subjects had a history of severe traumatic events. Healthy subjects had a significantly higher rate of PTSD diagnosis when compared with patients with schizophrenia (P = .012) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants.

		Patients (n = 103)	Healthy Subjects (n = 103)	P value
Gender (n, %)	Male	57 (55.3%)	57 (55.3%)	1.000
Gender (n, %)	Female	46 (44.7%)	46 (44.7%)	1.000
Age (years) (Mean, SD)		43.1±8.0	41.0±8.1	0.065
Duration of Education (years) (Mean, SD)		8.2±4.3	13.6±3.8	<0.001
Marital Status (n, %)	Married	10 (9.70%)	85 (82.52%)	<0.001
	Single	73 (70.87%)	11 (10.67%)
	Widow	20 (19.43%)	7 (6.81%)
Smoking (n, %)	Yes	53 (51.5%)	40 (38.8%)	0.069
Smoking (n, %)	No	50 (48.5%)	63 (61.2%)	0.069
History of the Severe Traumatic Event (n, %)		25 (24%)	34 (33%)	0.165
Diagnosed with PTSD (n, %)		12 (12%)	26 (25%)	0.012
CAPS-5 Score (Mean, SD)		9.6±14.7	17.0±17.8	<0.001

Bold values indicate statistical significance at the p ≤0.05. n: number of patients; SD: Standart deviation; PTSD:Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; CAPS-5: Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5.

Earthquake-related characteristics of participants

Twenty-three percent of the patients with schizophrenia and 60% of the healthy subjects stated that they went to a safer place on the night of the earthquake (P < .001). The floor of the house for each of the healthy subjects and patients with schizophrenia was 3.2 ± 2.2 and 1.8 ± 1.4, respectively (P < .001). Seven percent of the patients with schizophrenia and 18% of the healthy subjects stated that they had suffered economic loss due to the earthquake (P = .012). Findings for both groups also depict that 1% of subjects were injured. Three percent of healthy subjects and 1% of patients with schizophrenia reported injury to their family members (P = .313). Six percent of healthy subjects reported that they attended rescue operations after the earthquake (Table 2). None of the participants were reported trapped under rubble.

Table 2.

Assessment of earthquake-related characteristics of the participants.

		Patients (n = 103) n (%)	Healthy Subjects (n = 103) n (%)	P value
Going outside immediately after shaking stopped (n, %)		90 (87.37%)	96 (93.20%)	0.158
Going to a safer place on the night of EQ (n, %)		24 (23.30%)	62 (60.19%)	<0.001
The extent of damage to property (n, %)	Minimal	14 (13.59%)	24 (23.30%)	0.295
	Moderate	2 (1.94%)	4 (3.88%)
	Heavy	5 (4.58%)	8 (7.76%)
Death of a close relative or friend (n, %)		1 (0.97%)	3 (2.91%)	0.313
The floor of the house (Mean, SD)		1.8±1.4	3.2±2.2	<0.001
Injured (n, %)		2 (1.94%)	1 (0.97%)	0.562
İnjury to family members (n, %)<		2 (1.94%)	3 (2.91%)	0.652
Attend to rescue operation after the EQ (n, %)		0 (0.00%)	6 (5.82%)	0.013
Being trapped under rubble (n, %)		0 (0.00%)	1 (0.97%)	0.316

Bold values indicate statistical significance at the p ≤0.05. n: number of patients; SD:Standart deviation; EQ: Earthquake.

Assessment of coping strategies, and perceived social support of the participants

Adaptive coping styles such as active coping, planning, positive reframing, acceptance, and humor were significantly more common in healthy subjects (p < 0.001). As regards maladaptive coping styles, while disengagement was significantly more common in patients with schizophrenia, self-blaming, and venting were significantly more common in healthy subjects (P < .001). Perceived social support from family, friends, and significant others were significantly lower in patients with schizophrenia (p < 0.001).

The association of social supports and coping strategies with PTSD diagnosis

Seeking emotional support was significantly higher among patients with schizophrenia without PTSD (P = .012), while self-blaming was significantly higher in the PTSD-present group among patients with schizophrenia (P = .013). Perceived social support from friends was significantly higher in the PTSD-absent group among patients with schizophrenia (P = .021). Religious/spiritual coping was significantly higher in the PTSD-present group among healthy subjects (P = .020) and self-blaming was significantly higher in the PTSD-present group among healthy subjects (P < .001). The total maladaptive score was significantly higher in the PTSD-present group among healthy subjects (P = .010). Perceived social support from family and friends was significantly higher in the PTSD-absent group among healthy subjects (P = .006, P = .017). The association of PTSD with adaptive coping strategies, maladaptive coping strategies, and social support was shown in Table 3-5.

Table 3.

Association of PTSD with adaptive coping strategies.

		Adaptive Coping Strategies
		AC	P	PR	SIS	SES	A	RC	H	TA
Patient Group	PTSD Absent	5.2	5.0	4.7	5.4	5.2	5.3	6.0	2.9	39.9
	PTSD Present	5.1	4.7	5.0	4.5	3.9	5.2	7.0	3.5	39.1
	p value	0.758	0.602	0.751	0.101	0.012	0.734	0.089	0.214	0.865
Healthy Group	PTSD Absent	6.3	6.1	5.9	5.6	5.3	6.2	5.8	4.2	45.6
	PTSD Present	6.5	6.5	5.7	5.5	5.3	6.3	6.5	4.6	46.2
	p value	0.907	0.164	0.752	0.674	0.975	0.341	0.020	0.098	0.834

Bold values indicate statistical significance at the p ≤0.05. PTSD: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; AC: Active Coping; P: Planning; PR: Positive Reframing; SIS: Seeking Instrumental Support; SES: Seeking Emotional Support; A: Acceptance; RC: Religious/Spiritual Coping; H: Humor; TA: Total Adaptive Coping Score.

Table 4.

Association of PTSD with maladaptive coping strategies.

		Maladaptive Coping Strategies
		D	DIS	SD	V	SU	SB	TM
Patient Group	PTSD Absent	3.3	4.2	5.7	4.5	2.0	3.1	23.1
	PTSD Present	3.5	4.8	4.8	5.4	2.0	4.3	24.9
	p value	0.864	0.252	0.096	0.109	0.717	0.013	0.221
Healthy Group	PTSD Absent	3.1	3.2	5.8	5.5	2.0	3.7	23.3
	PTSD Present	3.0	3.8	6.0	5.5	2.0	5.1	25.4
	p value	0.613	0.035	0.522	0.719	0.418	<0.001	0.010

Bold values indicate statistical significance at the p ≤0.05. PTSD: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; D: Denial; DIS: Disengagement; SD: Self-Distraction; V: Venting; SU: Substance Use; SB: Self-Blaming; TM: Total Maladaptive Coping Score.

Table 5.

Association of PTSD with social support.

		Family	Friends	Significant Others	Total MPSSS
Patient Group	PTSD Absent (Mean, SD)	19.5 ± 7.4	16.0 ± 7.7	15.8 ± 7.3	51.0 ± 16.2
	PTSD Present (Mean, SD)	18.2 ± 7.7	10.4 ± 6.9	12.6 ± 6.9	41.1 ± 17.0
	p value	0.466	0.021	0.171	0.089
Healthy Group	PTSD Absent (Mean, SD)	26.1 ± 3.8	23.6 ± 5.6	19.4 ± 8.5	69.2 ± 14.4
	PTSD Present (Mean, SD)	22.3 ± 7.9	20.1 ± 7.4	18.0 ± 8.0	61.0 ± 19.7
	p value	0.006	0.017	0.328	0.054

Bold values indicate statistical significance at the p ≤0.05. SD: Standart deviation; PTSD: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; MPSSS: The Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale.

The association of PTSD with sociodemographic factors and earthquake-related factors

The association of PTSD with gender, history of traumatic events, the floor of the house, going to a safer place on the night of the earthquake, going outside immediately after the shaking stopped, and the extent of damage to property within both groups were evaluated. Being female and having a history of traumatic events were significantly higher in the PTSD-present group among healthy subjects (P = .045, P < .001). Going to a safer place on the night after the earthquake and getting caught on the higher floors of a building were significantly higher in the PTSD-present group among patients with schizophrenia (P = .009, P = .002). There was no difference regarding PTSD diagnosis between male patients with schizophrenia and male healthy subjects (P = .281). Female healthy subjects have a significantly higher PTSD risk when compared with female patients with schizophrenia (P = .015).

The association between clinical variables and diagnosis of PTSD with logistic regression analysis

According to the regression model created within patients with schizophrenia, going to a safer place on the night of the earthquake was associated with PTSD diagnosis. Religious coping and self-blaming coping styles were also found to be associated with PTSD diagnosis within patients with schizophrenia. Additionally, less emotional support seeking was associated with a PTSD diagnosis within patients with schizophrenia (Table 6). The logistic regression model fits well according to Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test (χ2 = 1.523, df = 8, P = .992).

Table 6.

Determination of variables associated with a PTSD diagnosis in patients with schizophrenia using logistic regression analysis.

Independent Variables	B	P value	OR	95% Confidence Interval
Sex	-2.082	0.107	0.125	0.100 - 1.569
Going to safer place	4.662	0.003	105.800	4.952 - 22.630
Floor of the house	0.059	0.830	1.060	0.620 - 1.814
History of traumatic events	-0.226	0.829	0.798	0.103 - 6.177
Seeking emotional support	-0.892	0.023	0.410	0.190 - 0.883
Religious coping	1.105	0.029	3.020	1.121 - 8.139
Self-blaming	1.036	0.016	2.817	1.213 - 6.541
Disengagement	-0.016	0.961	0.984	0.513 - 1.888
Social support from family	-0.002	0.981	0.998	0.860 - 1.158
Social support from friends	-0.150	0.065	0.861	0.734 - 1.009

Bold values indicate statistical significance at the p ≤0.05. PTSD: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, OR: Odds Ratio; N (number of participants) = 103; Log likelihood ratio: 35.432; Nagelkerke R2 : 0.610; Cox and Snell R2:0.313; Overall p value <0.001.

Less social support from family and the use of self-blaming coping styles were found to be associated with PTSD diagnosis within healthy controls. History of a traumatic event was also found to be associated with PTSD diagnosis within healthy controls (Table 7). The logistic regression model fits well according to Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test (χ2 = 6.453, df = 8, P = .597).

Table 7.

Determination of variables associated with a PTSD diagnosis in healthy subjects using logistic regression analysis.

Independent variables	B	P value	OR	95% Confidence Interval
Sex	-0.944	0.150	0.389	0.108 - 1.405
Going to safer place	0.180	0.979	1.018	0.264 - 3.933
Floor of the house	-0.024	0.864	0.976	0.737 - 1.292
History of traumatic events	2.479	<0.001	11.935	3.057 - 46.597
Seeking emotional support	0.000	0.998	1.000	0.658 - 1.519
Religious coping	0.374	0.157	1.454	0.866 - 2.440
Self-blaming	0.482	0.025	1.619	1.062 - 2.469
Disengagement	0.131	0.503	1.140	0.777 - 1.674
Social support from family	-0.161	0.013	0.851	0.749 - 0.967
Social support from friends	0.015	0.809	1.015	0.900 - 1.144

Bold values indicate statistical significance at the p ≤0.05. PTSD: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, OR: Odds Ratio; N (number of participants) = 103; Log likelihood ratio: 73.007; Nagelkerke R2 : 0.508; Cox and Snell R2:0.344; Overall p value <0.001.

Discussion

This study examined the prevalence of PTSD and the risk factors related to PTSD two years after the 2020 Elazığ earthquake in patients with schizophrenia and healthy subjects. One of the primary findings of this study was that PTSD symptoms experienced by survivors may persist even two years after the earthquake. We found that 25% of the healthy subjects and 12% of the patients with schizophrenia had earthquake-related PTSD diagnoses two years after the 2020 Elazığ earthquake. Healthy subjects had a significantly higher rate of earthquake-related PTSD diagnosis when compared with patients with schizophrenia. In literature, studies conducted after two years since the earthquake found a 21%-65% PTSD prevalence among healthy adults.^7,34,35 The PTSD prevalence rate and CAPS-5 score were significantly lower in patients with schizophrenia when compared with healthy subjects. These findings could be attributed to the fact that we only included patients with schizophrenia who had been in remission for at least six months. Pollice et al.³⁶ found 17% earthquake-related PTSD prevalence among 54 patients with schizophrenia, who were hospitalized within the eight months after the 2009 L'aquila earthquake. We designed a study with patients with schizophrenia who had been in this six-month period of remission to avoid confounding effects of psychotic episodes, which might occur if they had been hospitalized soon afterward. In a systematic review, PTSD comorbidity was found to be associated with higher levels of positive symptoms, general psychopathology, and worse functioning.³⁷ Tseng et al. showed a 21.6% increase in hospitalization incidence for schizophrenia two years after the earthquake.³⁸ Taking into consideration the increased risk of hospitalization after the earthquake and higher symptomatology related to PTSD comorbidity, we discounted some patients with schizophrenia, who did not meet our remission criteria. Thus, we suggest that clinicians should investigate earthquake-related PTSD symptoms for at least two years after the earthquake in patients with schizophrenia.

Healthy subjects had a significantly higher rate of going to a safer place on the night of the earthquake. It was winter at the time of the 2020 Elazığ earthquake and the temperature was about minus 4 centigrade on the night that it happened. There were 4322 aftershocks with magnitudes ranging from 0.8 to 5.4 occurred and 30 of them were of magnitude 4 and above. People generally preferred to spend the night of the earthquake in their cars and in safer cities far from the earthquake epicenter. However, 77% of patients with schizophrenia were not able to find an alternative solution and spent the night in their homes. In the first 24 hours after the main shock, large aftershocks that cause secondary disasters and more casualties are highly probable in and around the focal area.³⁹ Going to a safer place on the night of an earthquake may be critical for survival due to the risk of a building collapsing with aftershocks. Patients with schizophrenia have disadvantages such as lower social support, a lower economic situation, and lower active coping and planning skills in terms of understanding how best to act during and immediately after the earthquake. Drills and training programs should be organized to raise awareness of the risks and how to stay safe, especially in high-risk seismic zones.⁴⁰ Besides that, earthquake assembly areas should be designated where people can gather to be better protected from secondary disasters.⁴¹ Disadvantageous groups of society, such as patients with schizophrenia, should receive more frequent and specific training to give them the individual skills they need to react appropriately during and immediately after an earthquake.

We found that higher self-blaming scores were associated with a PTSD diagnosis in healthy subjects, while higher self-blaming and religious coping, and lower seeking for emotional support scores were associated with a PTSD diagnosis for patients with schizophrenia. These results are more consistent with prior research conducted among the general population, among which religious coping, self-distraction, self-blaming, substance use, denial, and venting were more common in earthquake-related PTSD compared with those who did not have PTSD.^14,42 According to our results, providing emotional support may have a protective effect on earthquake-related PTSD for patients with schizophrenia. Mattson et al.⁴³ showed that coping-oriented clinical intervention has the potential to reduce PTSD symptoms. Taken together, as coping strategies can be modified, coping-oriented interventions may prevent chronic PTSD.

Lower social support from family was associated with PTSD diagnosis for healthy subjects. Within the schizophrenia group, individuals with PTSD had lower scores in social support from friends when compared with those who did not have PTSD. A higher perception of social support protects against the development of PTSD after the earthquake.^44-46 In accordance with the literature, our study showed greater social support reduces the risk of the development of PTSD after the earthquake. Although social support is such a strong negative correlate of earthquake-related PTSD, the prevalence of earthquake-related PTSD was lower in those with schizophrenia. This may be attributed to the fact that we only included patients with schizophrenia who had been remitted for at least six months and patients with schizophrenia who were on antipsychotic treatment, which may have a protective effect against PTSD development.⁴⁷ More research would be needed to fully understand the complex relationships between social support, individual characteristics, and the development of PTSD in patients with schizophrenia.

Being female was a significantly higher factor in the PTSD-present group among healthy subjects. Although a significant result was obtained in univariate analysis, no relationship was found in the regression analysis. Being female has been shown as a risk factor for earthquake-related PTSD.^48-50 There was no difference in PTSD diagnosis in terms of gender among patients with schizophrenia. We could not show a relationship between gender and PTSD diagnosis for both groups. However, when the current limitations of this study and the results of other studies are evaluated together, gender differences in terms of PTSD diagnosis in patients with schizophrenia and healthy subjects should be investigated in further research. The existence of traumatic event history was significantly higher in the PTSD-present group among healthy subjects and was associated with PTSD diagnosis in healthy subjects. Breslau et al.⁵¹ showed that previous exposure to trauma signals a greater risk for the development of PTSD. Lowe et al.⁵² showed that a history of traumatic events related to a higher risk for PTSD. Our findings suggest that the existence of traumatic event history causes no significant change in terms of PTSD diagnosis in patients with schizophrenia while increasing the risk of developing PTSD in healthy subjects. Going to a safer place on the night after the earthquake and getting caught on the higher floors of a building were significantly higher in the PTSD-present group among patients with schizophrenia. Going to a safer place on the night of the earthquake was found associated with PTSD diagnosis in the schizophrenia group. Going to a safer place on the night of the earthquake protects survivors from secondary disasters due to aftershocks, but it also seems related to the increased risk of the development of PTSD in patients with schizophrenia. This may be attributed to an increased fear response during the earthquake, which was shown as a predictor of earthquake-related PTSD.⁴⁸ We have thoroughly studied the literature and have not found research on earthquake-related PTSD in patients with schizophrenia. Trauma and PTSD are underreported among patients with schizophrenia.⁵³ PTSD may be underdiagnosed in patients with schizophrenia due to negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, and diminished capacity for self-expression. Clinicians should rigorously investigate PTSD symptoms among patients with schizophrenia, especially in high seismic risk zones.

Study limitations

This was a cross-sectional study, in a convenience sample, and with a limited number of participants. We only included patients with schizophrenia who had been clinically remitted for at least six months. Therefore, our sample does not represent all survivors with schizophrenia of the 2020 Elazığ earthquake. All of the patients with schizophrenia were on pharmacological treatment at the time of the interview. Atypical antipsychotics are effective in PTSD treatment, especially in terms of adjunctive utilization.⁵⁴ The NICE guideline pointed out the potential role of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of PTSD.⁴⁷ Psychotropic medications may be a potential confounding factor, and the results may have been influenced by it. This study was conducted in the Elazığ city center, which is 35 km away from the epicenter, and data collection only lasted for four weeks, therefore it did not take into account survivors from other areas, nor data could have been obtained over a longer period.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the psychological impact of an earthquake may persist even years afterward, both in patients with schizophrenia and healthy subjects. Patients with schizophrenia may have different risk factors for the development of PTSD when compared with healthy subjects. Religious coping, self-blaming, less emotional support seeking, and going to a safer place on the night of the earthquake were found to be associated with a PTSD diagnosis in patients with schizophrenia. History of traumatic events, self-blaming, and less social support from family were found to be associated with a PTSD diagnosis in healthy subjects. The results of this study underscore the long-term psychological impact of earthquakes in patients with schizophrenia and suggest the need for interventions by taking into account coping strategies, social support, and other possible risk factors.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank and acknowledge the contribution of the research participants, treatment centre and staff.

Author contributions

The authors of this study, ABT, MHÖ, HK, and SA, have all made substantial contributions that justify their inclusion as co-authors. ABT contributed to the conception and design of the work, as well as the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. MHÖ played a crucial role in the study's conception and design, as well as the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. HK contributed to the conception and design of the study, as well as the acquisition of data. SA made substantial contributions to the study's conception and design, as well as the acquisition of data. They also contributed to the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have given their final approval for publication and agreed to be accountable for the work's integrity.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Non-Invasive Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey (2021/09–35).

ORCID iDs

Ali Baran Tanrikulu

Mehmet Hamdi Örüm

References

Bozkurt

Mittwede

. Introduction to the geology of Turkey—a synthesis. International Geology Review. 2001;43:578-594.

Bayik

Gurbuz

Abdikan

Gormus

Kutoglu

. Investigation of source parameters of the 2020 Elazig-Sivrice Earthquake (Mw 6.8) in the East anatolian fault zone. Pure Appl Geophys. 2022;179:587-598.

Pousse‐Beltran

Nissen

Bergman

, et al. The 2020 M w 6.8 Elazığ (Turkey) earthquake reveals rupture behavior of the East Anatolian Fault. Geophysical Research Letters. 2020;47:e2020GL088136.

Kõlves

De Leo

. Natural disasters and suicidal behaviours: a systematic literature review. J Affect Disord. 2013;146:1-14.

Galea

Nandi

Vlahov

. The epidemiology of post-traumatic stress disorder after disasters. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:78-91.

Edition

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Am Psychiatric Assoc. 2013;21:591-643.

Armenian

Morikawa

Melkonian

, et al. Loss as a determinant of PTSD in a cohort of adult survivors of the 1988 earthquake in Armenia: implications for policy. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;102:58-64.

Salcioglu

Basoglu

Livanou

. Long-term psychological outcome for non-treatment-seeking earthquake survivors in Turkey. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003;191:154-160.

Pino

Pelosi

Artoni

Mari

. Post-traumatic outcomes among survivors of the earthquake in central Italy of August 24, 2016. a study on PTSD risk and vulnerability factors. Psychiatr Q. 2021;92:1489-1511.

10.

Aoki

Harima

. The impact of the Great East Japan earthquake on mandatory psychiatric emergency hospitalizations in Tokyo: a retrospective observational study. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2:e168-e168.

11.

Sakuma

Ueda

Rengi

Shingai

Matsuoka

Matsumoto

. Increase in the number of admissions to psychiatric hospitals immediately after the G reat E ast Japan E arthquake. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2018;10:e12307.

12.

Asnaani

Kaczkurkin

Fitzgerald

Jerud

Foa

. The association between cognitive coping strategies and treatment outcomes in smokers with PTSD. Psychol Trauma. 2020;12:92-100.

13.

Theleritis

Psarros

Mantonakis

, et al. Coping and its relation to PTSD in Greek firefighters. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020;208:252-259.

14.

Cofini

Carbonelli

Cecilia

Binkin

di Orio

. Post traumatic stress disorder and coping in a sample of adult survivors of the Italian earthquake. Psychiatry Res. 2015;229:353-358.

15.

Simon

Roberts

Lewis

van Gelderen

Bisson

. Associations between perceived social support, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD): implications for treatment. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019;10:1573129.

16.

Wang

Chung

Wang

Kenardy

. Social support and posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;85:101998.

17.

Jameel

Panatik

Nabeel

, et al. Observed social support and willingness for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:193-201.

18.

Makwana

. Disaster and its impact on mental health: A narrative review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:3090-3095.

19.

American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American psychiatric association; 2013.

20.

Andreasen

Carpenter

Jr Kane

Lasser

Marder

Weinberger

. Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:441-449.

21.

Kay

Fiszbein

Opler

. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13:261-276.

22.

Weathers

Blake

Schnurr

, et al. The life events checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). Instrument available from the National Center for PTSD. 2013;6:2021. Retrieved September .

23.

Boysan

Guzel Ozdemir

Yilmaz

Selvi

Özdemir

Celal Kefeli

. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition (Turkish CAPS-5). Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2017;27:173-184.

24.

Weathers

Blake

Schnurr

, et al. The clinician-administered PTSD scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Interview available from the National Center for PTSD at www_ptsd_va_gov. 2013;6.

25.

Carver

Scheier

Weintraub

. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;56:267-283.

26.

Carver

. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4:92-100.

27.

Bacanlı

Sürücü

İlhan

. Başa çıkma stilleri ölçeği kısa formunun (BÇSÖ-KF) psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimler. 2013;13:81-96.

28.

Meyer

Coping with severe mental illness: Relations of the Brief COPE with symptoms, functioning, and well-being. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2001;23:265-277.

29.

Zimet

Dahlem

Zimet

Farley

. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of personality assessment. 1988;52:30-41.

30.

Eker

Arkar

. Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi. 1995;10:45-55.

31.

Blake

. A clinician rating scale for assessing current and lifetime PTSD. The CAPS-1. Behav Ther. 1990;18:187-188.

32.

Association AP and Association AP . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Arlington, VA: DSM-5; 2013.

33.

Weathers

Bovin

Lee

, et al. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM–5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans. Psychol Assess. 2018;30:383-395.

34.

Chen

, et al. The presence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in earthquake survivors one month after a mudslide in southwest C hina. Nurs Health Sci. 2014;16:39-45.

35.

Ali

Farooq

Bhatti

Kuroiwa

. Assessment of prevalence and determinants of posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of earthquake in Pakistan using Davidson Trauma Scale. J Affect Disord. 2012;136:238-243.

36.

Pollice

Bianchini

Conti

Mazza

Roncone

Casacchia

. Cognitive impairment and perceived stress in schizophrenic inpatients with post-traumatic stress disorder. Eur J Inflamm. 2010;8:211-219.

37.

Seow

LSE

Ong

Mahesh

, et al. A systematic review on comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016;176:441-451.

38.

Tseng

K-C

Hemenway

Kawachi

Subramanian

Chen

. The impact of the Chi-Chi earthquake on the incidence of hospitalizations for schizophrenia and on concomitant hospital choice. Community Ment Health J. 2010;46:93-101.

39.

Omi

Ogata

Hirata

Aihara

. Forecasting large aftershocks within one day after the main shock. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2218.

40.

Zhou

Nie

, et al. Research on earthquake emergency response modes of individuals based on social surveillance video. International journal of disaster risk reduction. 2018;28:350-362.

41.

Aman

Aytac

. Multi-criteria decision making for city-scale infrastructure of post-earthquake assembly areas: Case study of Istanbul. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022;67:102668.

42.

Baral

Bhagawati

. Post traumatic stress disorder and coping strategies among adult survivors of earthquake, Nepal. BMC psychiatry. 2019;19:1-8.

43.

Mattson

James

Engdahl

. Personality factors and their impact on PTSD and post-traumatic growth is mediated by coping style among OIF/OEF veterans. Mil Med. 2018;183:e475-e480.

44.

Dinenberg

McCaslin

Bates

Cohen

. Social support may protect against development of posttraumatic stress disorder: Findings from the Heart and Soul Study. Am J Health Promot. 2014;28:294-297.

45.

Alipour

Ahmadi

. Social support and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in earthquake survivors: A systematic review. Social Work in Mental Health. 2020;18:501-514.

46.

Shang

Kaniasty

Cowlishaw

Wade

Forbes

. Social support following a natural disaster: A longitudinal study of survivors of the 2013 Lushan earthquake in China. Psychiatry Res. 2019;273:641-646.

47.

Megnin-Viggars

Mavranezouli

Greenberg

Hajioff

Leach

. Post-traumatic stress disorder: What does NICE guidance mean for primary care? Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69:328-329.

48.

Başoǧlu

Kiliç

Şalcioǧlu

, et al. Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid depression in earthquake survivors in Turkey: an epidemiological study. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. 2004;17:133-141.

49.

Cénat

Derivois

. Assessment of prevalence and determinants of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms in adults survivors of earthquake in Haiti after 30 months. J Affect Disord. 2014;159:111-117.

50.

Rafiey

Alipour

LeBeau

Salimi

. Prevalence and determinants of PTSD 3 years after an earthquake in Iran. Community Ment Health J. 2019;55:542-547.

51.

Breslau

Chilcoat

Kessler

Davis

. Previous exposure to trauma and PTSD effects of subsequent trauma: results from the Detroit Area Survey of Trauma. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:902-907.

52.

Lowe

Walsh

Uddin

Galea

Koenen

. Bidirectional relationships between trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress: a longitudinal study of Detroit residents. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014;123:533-544.

53.

Lommen

Restifo

. Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Community Ment Health J. 2009;45:485-496.

54.

Adetunji

Mathews

Williams

, et al. Use of antipsychotics in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2005;2:43-47.

Prevalence and determinants of post-traumatic stress disorder in patients with schizophrenia 2 years after an earthquake in Turkey

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Participants and procedure

Measurements

Brief coping orientation to problems experienced

Multidimensional scale of perceived social support

Clinician-administered PTSD scale for DSM-5

Statistical analysis

Results

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants

Earthquake-related characteristics of participants

Assessment of coping strategies, and perceived social support of the participants

The association of social supports and coping strategies with PTSD diagnosis

The association of PTSD with sociodemographic factors and earthquake-related factors

The association between clinical variables and diagnosis of PTSD with logistic regression analysis

Discussion

Study limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Ethical approval

ORCID iDs

References