Administrative versus Research Performance Ratings: An Empirical Test of Rating Data Quality

Berman J. S. Kenny D. A. Correlational bias: Not gone and not to be forgotten. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 882–887.

Block J. Correlational bias in observer ratings: Another perspective on the Berman and Kenny study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 873–880.

Borman W. C. Effects of instructions to avoid halo error on reliability and validity of performance evaluation ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 556–560.

Borman W. C. Individual differences correlates of accuracy in evaluating others' performance effectiveness. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979, 3, 103–115. (b)

Cooper W. H. Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90, 218–244.

Feild H. S. Holley W. H. Traits in performance ratings—their importance in public employment. Public Personnel Management, 1975, September—October, 327–330

Landy F. J. Fair J. L. Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87, 72–107.

Sharon A. T. Bartlett C. J. Effect of instructional conditions in producing leniency on two types of rating scales. Personnel Psychology, 1969, 22, 251–263.

Taylor E. K. Wherry R. J. A study of leniency in two rating systems. Personnel Psychology, 1951, 4, 39–47.

Warmke D. L. Effects of accountability procedures upon the utility of peer ratings of present performance (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1980, 40, 4011–B. (University Microfilms No. 80–01, 853)

Warmke D. L. Billings R. S. Comparison of training methods for improving the psychometric quality of experimental and administrative performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 124–131.