DahlR. A. (1970) After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.
12.
DahlR. A. (1967a) “The evaluation of political systems,” in PoolI. S. (ed.) Contemporary Political Science: Toward Empirical Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
DahlR. A. (1967b) Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent. Chicago: Rand McNally.
14.
DahlR. A. (1966) “Further reflections on ‘The elitist theory of democracy.‘”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.60.
15.
DahlR. A. (1961a) ‘The behavioral approach in political science: epitaph for a monument to a successful protest.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.55.
16.
DahlR. A. (1961b) Who Governs?New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.
17.
DahlR. A. (1956a) “Hierarchy, democracy and bargaining in politics and economics,” in EulauH. (eds.) Political Behavior. New York: Random House.
18.
DahlR. A. (1956b) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
19.
DavisL. (1964) “The cost of realism: contemporary restatements of democracy.”Western Pol. Q.17.
20.
DuncanG.LukesS. (1963) “The new democracy.”Pol. Studies11.
21.
DunnJ. (1972) Review in Sociology6: 119–121.
22.
EastonD. (1969) “The new revolution in political science.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.63.
23.
EcksteinH. (1966) Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
24.
HareR. M. (1970) “Meaning and speech acts.”Phil. Rev.79: 3–24.
25.
HartzL. (1960) “Democracy: image and reality,” in ChambersW. N.SalisburyR. H. (eds.) Democracy in the Mid-Twentieth Century. St. Louis: Univ. of Missouri Press.
26.
KeyV. O.Jr. (1956) Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
27.
KornhauserW. (1959) The Politics of Mass Society. New York: Free Press.
28.
LipsetS. M. (1962) “Introduction,” in R. Michels, Political Parties. New York: Free Press.
29.
LipsetS. M. (1960) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
30.
MacIntyreA. (1971) Against the Self-Images of the Age: Essays on Ideology and Philosophy. New York: Schocken.
31.
MayoH. B. (1960) An Introduction to Democratic Theory. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
32.
MilbrathL. W. (1965) Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.
33.
ParryG. (1969) Political Elites. New York: Praeger.
34.
RousseasS. W.FarganisJ. (1963) “American politics and the end of ideology.”British J. of Sociology14: 347–362.
35.
RuncimanW. G. (1963) Social Science and Political Theory. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
36.
SartoriG. (1968) “Democracy.” in Volume 4 of SillsD. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.
37.
SartoriG. (1965) Democratic Theory. New York.
38.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1965) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
39.
SearleJ. R. (1962) “Meaning and speech acts.”Phil. Rev.71.
40.
SomjeeA. H. (1971) “Pluralist behavioralist paradigm in political science.”Pol. Studies19.
41.
SurkinM. (1970) “Sense and non-sense in politics,” in WolfeA.SurkinM. (eds.) An End to Political Science: The Caucus Papers. New York: Basic Books.
42.
TaylorC. (1967) “Neutrality in political science,” in LaslettP.RuncimanW. G. (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
43.
WalkerJ. L. (1966) “A reply to ‘Further reflections on the elitist theory of democracy.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.60.
44.
WalkerJ. L. (1965) “A critique of the elitist theory of democracy.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.60.
45.
WarnockG. J. (1971) “Hare on meaning and speech acts.”Phil. Rev.80: 80–84.
46.
WolfeA.SurkinM., [eds.] (1970) An End to Political Science: The Caucus Papers. New York: Basic Books.