It is a problem that the environment is often seen and treated as a reservoir of resources awaiting human use. How did this outlook arise? This essay analyzes a formative moment in the constitution of the environment as a buffet of goods to be consumed: seventeenth-century efforts by agricultural improvers, including John Locke, to eradicate waste. Locke’s theory of property prohibits the wasteful spoilage of food and charges mankind with a responsibility to cultivate, incorporate, and thereby appropriate earth’s nonhuman eatables—what I call his “partition of the digestible.” But eating both underwrites and unhinges Lockean property rights, for all food contains materials that cannot be used by the body and must be excreted from it. Poop and pee serve as visible (and smelly) reminders that consumption is inhabited by, and thus cannot resolve, waste. Even the improvers’ ostensible solution of repurposing excrement as manure to produce more food just creates more waste: this “peristaltic circle,” as I describe it, is voracious and expansive. Circular waste-eradication projects are best understood as enabling preconditions for the wastefulness of linear, take-make-waste political economies, not their antidote.
AnsteyPeter. 2010. “John Locke and Helmontian Medicine.” The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge: Embodied Empiricism in Early Modern Science. Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands.
2.
BakhtinMikhail. 1984. Rabelais and His World. Translated by IswolskyHelene. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3.
BatailleGeorges. 1991. The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy, vol. I, translated by HurleyRobert. New York: Zone Books.
4.
BlithWalther. 1653. The English Improver Improved. London: Printed for John Wright.
5.
BownStephen R.2005. A Most Damnable Invention: Dynamite, Nitrates, and the Making of the Modern World. New York: Penguin.
6.
CalvinoItalo. 1993. “La Poubelle Agréée.” In The Road to San Giovanni. Translated by ParksTim. New York: Pantheon, 93–126.
7.
CrawfordPatricia. 1981. “Attitudes to Menstruation in Seventeenth-Century England.” Past & Present91, no. 1: 47–73.
DewhurstKenneth. 1984. John Locke 1632-1704: Physician and Philosopher. New York: Garland Publishing.
10.
DunnJohn. 1982. The Political Thought of John Locke: A Historical Account of the Argument of the ‘Two Treatises of Government’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GlimpDavid. 2003. Increase and Multiply: Governing Cultural Reproduction in Early Modern England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
GowingLaura. 2003. Common Bodies: Women, Touch and Power in Seventeenth-Century England. New Haven: Yale University Press.
14.
Guha-MajumdarJishnu. 2021. “Lyons and Tygers and Wolves, Oh My! Human Equality and the ‘Dominion Covenant’ in Locke’s Two Treatises.” Political Theory49, no. 4: 637–61.
15.
HarawayDonna J.2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
16.
HindleSteve. 2008. “Dearth and the English Revolution: The Harvest Crisis of 1647-50.” The Economic History Review61, no. S1: 64–98.
17.
HirschmannNancy J.2007. Feminist Interpretations of John Locke. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
18.
InglisDavid. 2000. A Sociological History of Excretory Experience: Defecatory Manners and Toiletry Technologies. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.
19.
JudgeRebecca. 2002. “Restoring the Commons: Toward a New Interpretation of Locke’s Theory of Property.” Land Economics78, no. 3: 331–38.
20.
KerridgeEric. 1967. The Agricultural Revolution. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
21.
LacyPeterJessica Long, and Wesley Spindler.2020. The Circular Economy Handbook. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
LaporteDominique. History of Shit. Translated by BenabidNadiael-KhouryRodolphe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
LatourBruno. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Medford: Polity Press.
24.
LiebellSusan P.2011. “The Text and Context of ‘Enough and as Good’: John Locke as the Foundation of an Environmental Liberalism.” Polity4, no. 2: 210–41.
25.
LockeJohn. 1988. Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MacphersonC. B.1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
McLarenDorothy. 1985. “Marital Fertility and Lactation 1570-1720.” In Women in English Society 1500-1800, edited by PriorMary. London: Methuen.
28.
MooreJason W.2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York: Verso.
29.
MortonTimothy. 2018. Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
ParkerGeoffrey. 2012. Global Crisis: War, Climate and Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
PlattesGabriel. 1639. A Discovery of Infinite Treasure. London: Printed by I. L.[egatt].
RancièreJacques.2004. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, translated by RoseJulie. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004.
34.
ReadSara. 2013. Menstruation and the Female Body in Early Modern England. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
SauvéSébastienSophie Bernard, and Pamela Sloan.2016. “Environmental Sciences, Sustainable Development and Circular Economy: Alternative Concepts for Trans-Disciplinary Research.” Environmental Development17: 48–56.
36.
ShafferSimon. 1997. “The Earth’s Fertility as a Social Fact in Early Modern Britain.” In Nature and Society in Historical Context, edited by TeichMikulasPorter, andRoyGustafssonBo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SkeltonLeona J.2016. Sanitation in Urban Britain, 1560-1700. New York: Routledge.
38.
SlackPaul. 2015. The Invention of Improvement: Information and Material Progress in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
StolbergMichael. 2005. “Menstruation and Sexual Difference in Early Modern Medicine.” In Menstruation: A Cultural History, edited by ShailAndrewHowieGillian. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
StrasserSusan. 1999. Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash. New York: Metropolitan Books.
41.
TullyJames. 1980. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
WalmsleyJonathan. 2000. “‘Morbus’ – Locke’s Early Essay on Disease.” Early Science and Medicine5, no. 4: 366–93.
43.
WeberMax. 2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by ParsonsTalcott. New York: Routledge.
44.
WebsterCharles. 1976. The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform 1626-1660. Holmes & Meier Publishers: New York.
45.
WeilRachel. 1999. Political Passions: Gender, the Family, and Political Argument in England 1680-1714. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
46.
WitteringShirley. 2013. Ecology and Enclosure: The Effect of Enclosure on Society, Farming and the Environment in South Cambridgeshire, 1798-1850. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
47.
WoodNeal. 1984. John Locke and Agrarian Capitalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
WrightJoanne H.2007. “Recovering Locke’s Midwifery Notes.” In Feminist Interpretations of John Locke, edited by HirshmannNancy J.McClureKristie M.University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
