The Phoenician Women, Euripides’ peculiar retelling and refashioning of the Theban myth, offers a portrait of Antigone before she becomes the actor we mostly know today from Sophocles’ play. In this under-studied Greek tragedy, Euripides portrays the political and epistemological dissolution that allows for Antigone’s appearance in public. Whereas Sophocles’ Antigone appears on stage ready to confront Creon with her appeal to the universal unwritten laws of the gods and later dissolves into the female lamenting a lost womanhood, Euripides’ Antigone experiences the opposite journey, thereby offering insights into the conditions that allow for her exposure in the political arena. A speech by Eteocles at the center of the play questions the existence of absolutes, calls injustice beautiful, and opens the door for Antigone’s entrance into the public sphere. With this speech Eteocles challenges us to consider the conditions of political openness in the modern age.
Balot, Ryan. Forthcoming. Free Speech, Courage, and Democratic Deliberation. In Parrhêsia, ed. R. Rosen and I. Sluiter. Brill. 233-259.
2.
Benardete, Seth. 1974. A Reading of Sophocles’Antigone. Interpretation4:148-196.
3.
Butler, Judith. 2000. Antigone’s Claim: Kinship between Life and Death. New York: Columbia University Press.
4.
Cohen, David. 1989. Seclusion, Separation, and the Status of Women in Classical Athens. Greece & Rome36:3-15.
5.
Conacher, D.J.1967. Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
6.
Dietz, Mary G.1985. Citizenship with a Feminist Face: The Problem with Maternal Thinking. Political Theory13:19-37.
7.
Dunn, Francis M.1996. Tragedy’s End: Closure and Innovation in Euripidean Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1982. Antigone’s Daughters. Democracy2:46-59
9.
Euben, J. Peter. 1982. Justice and the Oresteia. American Political Science Review76:22-33.
10.
Euben, J. Peter. 1986a. Greek Tragedy and Political Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Euben, J. Peter. 1986b. Political Corruption in Euripides’ Orestes.In Greek Tragedy and Political Theory, ed. J. Peter Euben, 222-251. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Euben, J. Peter. 1990. The Tragedy of Political Theory: The Road Not Taken. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Euben, J. Peter. 1997. Corrupting Youth: Political Education, Democratic Culture, and Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Foley, Helene P.1985. Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15.
Foley, Helene P.2001. Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Foucault, Michel. 2001. Fearless Speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
17.
Holland, Catherine. 1998. After Antigone: Women, the Past, and the Future of Feminist Political Thought. American Journal of Political Science42:1108-1132.
18.
Kitto, H. D. F.1950. Greek Tragedy: A Literary Study. London: Methuen.
19.
Loraux, Nicole. 1987. Tragic Ways of Killing a Woman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Manville, Philip. 1990. The Origins of Citizenship in Ancient Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Markell, Patchen. 2003. Tragic Recognition: Action and Identity in Antigone and Aristotle. Political Theory31:6-38.
22.
Mendelsohn, Daniel. A Little Iliad, New York Review of Books, June 24, 2004, 51:11, 46-49.
23.
Monoson, S. Sara. 1994. Frank Speech, Democracy, and Philosophy: Plato’s Debt to a Democratic Strategy of Civic Discourse. In Athenian Political Thought and the Reconstruction of American Democracy, ed. Peter Eubenet al.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24.
Monoson, S. Sara. 2000. Plato’s Democratic Entanglements: Athenian Politics and the Practice of Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Murray, Gilbert. 1938. The Complete Greek Tragedy. Vol. 2, ed. Whitney J. Oates and Eugene O’Neill, Jr.New York: Random House.
26.
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.1980. Men, Women, War, and Politics: Family and Polis in Aristophanes and Euripides. Political Theory8:65-81.
27.
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.1986a. Autochthony and the Beginnings of Cities in Euripides’ Ion.In Political Theory and Classical Drama, ed. J. Peter Euben. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.1986b. From Hierarchy to Tragedy and Back Again: Women in Greek Political Thought. American Political Science Review80:403-418.
29.
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.1988. The Tyranny of Reason in the World of the Polis. American Political Science Review82:1261-1275.
30.
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.1992. Fear of Diversity: The Birth of Political Science in Ancient Greek Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.1996. Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
32.
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.1998. Democracy, Equality and Eidê: A Radical View from Book 8 of Plato’s Republic. American Political Science Review92:273-283.
33.
Sealey, Raphael. 1974. The Origins of Demokratia. California Studies in Classical Antiquity6:252-295.
34.
Steiner, George. 1984. Antigones. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Vlastos, Gregory. 1953. Isonomia. American Journal of Philology74:337-366.
36.
Zerilli, Linda M. G.1991. Machiavelli’s Sisters: Women in “the Conversation” of Political Theory. Political Theory19:252-276.
