This essay interprets changes in how “the political” was employed by a group of political theorists connected to the University of California, Berkeley, from the late 1950s up to the present. Initially, the political names both what students of politics ought to study and invokes a way of studying meant to have broad appeal. In later uses, however, the political takes on an evanescent quality compared to the solid realm of generality represented in earlier work. Also, only from the 1970s on is the political explicitly identified with democracy. Finally, later uses of the political no longer invoke a mode of study with broad appeal but one that even most self-described political theorists fail to practice. Though the changes the author analyzes in how the political was conceived are specific to the work of a small group of theorists, they suggest a more general story about the late twentieth-century development of political theory in the American academy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arendt, Hannah. 1958a. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Arendt, Hannah. 1958b. What was authority? In Authority: Nomos I, edited by Carl J. Friedrich, 81-112. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Arendt, Hannah. 1961. Between past and future: Six exercises in political thought. New York: Viking.
4.
Arendt, Hannah. 1963. On revolution. New York: Penguin.
5.
Ball, Terence. 1988. Transforming political discourse: Political theory and critical conceptual history. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
6.
Botwinick, Aryeh, and William Connolly, eds. 2001. Democracy and vision: Sheldon Wolin and the vicissitudes of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Connolly, William. 2001. Politics and vision. In Democracy and vision: Sheldon Wolin and the vicissitudes of the political, edited by Aryeh Botwinick and William Connolly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Easton, David. 1991. Oral history. In Political science in America: Oral histories of a discipline, edited by Michael A. Baer, Malcolm E. Jewell, and Lee Sigelman. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
9.
Elshtain, Jean. 2001. Two cheers for democracy. Review of Tocqueville between two worlds, by Sheldon S. Wolin. Washington Post National Weekly Edition, 26 November-2 December:23.
10.
Eulau, Heinz. 1991. Oral history. In Political science in America: Oral histories of a discipline, edited by Michael A. Baer, Malcolm E. Jewell, and Lee Sigelman. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
11.
Gunnell, John G. 1993. The descent of political theory: The genealogy of an American vocation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
12.
Gunnell, John G. 1998. The orders of discourse. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
13.
Holmes, Stephen. 2002. Both sides now. Review of Tocqueville between two worlds, by Sheldon S. Wolin. New Republic 4546 and 4547 (March 4 and 11): 31-38.
14.
Jacobson, Norman. 1958. The unity of political theory: Science, morals, and politics. In Approaches to the study of politics, edited by Roland Arnold Young. Evanston, IL: North-western University Press.
15.
Jacobson, Norman. 1978. Pride and solace: The functions and limits of political theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Jacobson, Norman. 1999. Interview by author. Tape recording. Reno, NV, 6 November. American Political Science Association Oral History Archive, University of Kentucky Library, Lexington.
17.
Jacobson, Norman. 2000. Interview by author. Tape recording. Reno, NV, 4 January. American Political Science Association Oral History Archive, University of Kentucky Library, Lexington.
18.
Lowen, Rebecca. 1997. Creating the cold war university: The transformationof Stanford. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
Mouffe, Chantal. 1996. Democracy, power, and the “political.” In Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political, edited by Seyla Benhabib. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Pateman, Carole, ed. 1989. Sublimation and reification: Locke, Wolin and the liberal-democratic conception of the political. In The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism and political theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1972. Wittgenstein and justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1973. The roots of conservatism: Michael Oakeshott and the denial of politics. Dissent, 496-525.
24.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1976. Inhuman conduct and unpolitical theory: Michael Oakeshott’s On Human Conduct. Political Theory4: 301-320.
25.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1984. Fortune is a woman: Gender and politics in the thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1998. The attack of the blob: Hannah Arendt’s concept of the social. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel, and Sara Shumer. 1991. On participation. In Higher education and the practice of democratic politics. A political education reader, edited by Bernard Murchland. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
28.
Schaar, John H. 1961. Escape from authority: The perspectives of Erich Fromm. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Schaar, John H., and Sheldon S. Wolin. 1963. Essays on the scientific study of politics: A critique. American Political Science Review57: 125-150.
30.
Schmitt, Carl. [1932] 1976. The concept of the political. Translated by George Schwab. Reprint, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
31.
Strauss, Leo. 1962. An epilogue. In Essays on the scientific study of politics, edited by Herbert J. Storing. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
32.
White, Stephen. 2001. Three conceptions of the political: The real world of late modern democracy. In Democracy and vision: Sheldon Wolin and the vicissitudes of the political, edited by Aryeh Botwinick and William Connolly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1960. Politics and vision: Continuity and innovation in Western political thought. Boston: Little, Brown.
34.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1968. Political theory: Trends and goals. In International encyclopedia of the social sciences, vol. 12. New York: MacMillan.
35.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1969. Political theory as a vocation. American Political Science Review63: 1062-1082.
36.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1976. The politics of self-disclosure. Political Theory4: 321-334.
37.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1981a. The people’s two bodies. Democracy1: 9-24.
38.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1981b. Why democracy? Democracy1: 3-5.
39.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1982. What revolutionary action means today. Democracy2: 17-28.
40.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1989. Contract and birthright. In The presence of the past: Essays on the state and the constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1990. Hannah Arendt: Democracy and the political. In The realm of humanitas: Responses to the writings of Hannah Arendt, edited by Reuben Garner. New York: Peter Lang.
42.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1992. Interview by Nicholas Xenos. Tape recording. Whitethorn, CA, 10-11 July. American Political Science Association Oral History Archive, University of Kentucky Library, Lexington.
43.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1994. Norm and form: The constitutionalizing of democracy. In Athenian political thought and the reconstruction of American democracy, edited by J. Peter Euben, John Wallach, and Josiah Ober. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
44.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1996a. Fugitive democracy. In Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political, edited by Seyla Benhabib. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1996b. The liberal/democratic divide. On Rawls’s Political Liberalism. Political Theory24: 97-119.
46.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1997. What time is it? Theory & Event1: 1.
47.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 2000. Political theory: From vocation to invocation. In Vocations of political theory, edited by Jason Frank and John Tambornino. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
48.
Wolin, Sheldon S. 2001. Tocqueville between two worlds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Wolin, Sheldon S., and John H. Schaar. 1970. The Berkeley student revolt: Facts and interpretations. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
50.
Xenos, Nicholas. 2001. Momentary democracy. In Democracy and vision: Sheldon Wolin and the vicissitudes of the political, edited by Aryeh Botwinick and William Connolly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth. 1982. Hannah Arendt: For love of the world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
