Sexual selection and religion: Can the evolution of religion be explained in terms of mating strategies?

Abstract

This article considers the application of sexual selection theory to the study of religion by discussing the basic concepts and theories in sexual selection and then outlines possibilities of its application to the study of the evolution of religion. The first section outlines basic principles in the sexual selection account, including the evolution of human mating strategies based on dimorphism, gender differences in human mating strategies, and the role of different cultural activities in mating dynamics. Such an overview may be useful for the readers who are less familiar with the basic assumptions of the sexual selection theory. The remaining sections demonstrate how religion may function as a signal for mating qualities associated with a long-term mating strategy and how different facets of religiosity may help to support long-term mating strategies. The key idea of the article is that there are good reasons to try to explain the evolution of at least some of the components of religion in terms of sexual selection.

Keywords

Evolution of religion sexual selection sexual selection theory of religion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(1974). The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 325–383.

Andersson

(1994). Sexual selection. Princeton University Press.

Baumeister

R. F.

Vohs

K. D.

(2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 339–363.

Bell

(2015). Fathering, rituals, and mating: Exploring paternal stability and sexual strategies in early religious practices. In Slone

D. J.

Van Slyke

J. A.

(Eds.), The attraction of religion. A new evolutionary psychology of religion (pp. 169–188). Bloomsbury Academic.

Berglund

Bisazza

Pilastro

(1996). Armaments and ornaments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58(4), 385–399. http://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1996.0043

Block

Dewitte

(2007). Mating games: Cultural evolution and sexual selection. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 475–491. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9041-y

Blume

(2009). The reproductive benefits of religious affiliation. In Voland

Schiefenhovel

(Eds.), The biological evolution of the religious mind and behaviour (pp. 117–126). New York.

Blume

(2015). How is’t with thy religion, pray? Selection of religiosity among individuals and groups. In Slone

D. J.

Van Slyke

J. A.

(Eds.), The attraction of religion. A new evolutionary psychology of religion (pp. 63–72). Bloomsbury Academic.

Bulbulia

Sosis

(2011). Signaling theory and the evolution of religious cooperation. Religion, 41(3), 363–388. http://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2011.604508

10.

Burkart

J. M.

Hrdy

S. B.

Van Schaik

C. P.

(2009). Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 18(5), 175–186. http://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20222

11.

Buss

D. M.

(1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628.

12.

Buss

D. M.

(2002). Sex, marriage, and religion: What adaptive problems do religious phenomena solve? Psychological Inquiry, 13(3), 201–203.

13.

Buss

D. M.

(2017). Sexual conflict in human mating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 307–313.

14.

Buss

D. M.

(2018). Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 155–160.

15.

Buss

D. M.

Goetz

Duntley

J. D.

Asao

Conroy-Beam

(2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149.

16.

Buss

D. M.

Schmitt

D. P.

(1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232.

17.

Buss

D. M.

Schmitt

D. P.

(2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 77–110. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408

18.

Buss

D. M.

Shackelford

T. K.

(2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 134–146.

19.

Cohen

L. L.

Shotland

R. L.

(1996). Timing of first sexual intercourse in a relationship: Expectations, experiences, and perceptions of others. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 291–299.

20.

Conroy-Beam

Goetz

C. D.

Buss

D. M.

(2015). Why do humans form long-term mateships? An evolutionary game-theoretic model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–39.

21.

Darwin

(1859). On the origin of species by mean of natural selection, or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.

22.

Del Giudice

Gangestad

S. W.

Kaplan

H. S

. (2015). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In Buss

D. M.

(Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology—Vol. 1: Foundations (2nd ed., pp. 88–114). John Wiley & Sons.

23.

Easton

J. A.

Goetz

C. D.

Buss

D. M.

(2015). The evolution of human mate choice. In Wright

J. D.

(Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 340–347). Elsevier.

24.

Everett

Jenks

(2002). Divorce, annulments, and the Catholic Church: Healing or hurtful? Routledge.

25.

Frederick

D. A.

Haselton

M. G.

(2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1167–1183. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303022

26.

Futuyma

D. J.

Kirkpatrick

(2017). Evolution (4th ed.). Sinauer Associates.

27.

Gallup

G. G.

Frederick

D. A.

(2010). The science of sex appeal: An evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 14(3), 240–250. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020451

28.

Gavrilets

(2012). Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(25), 9923–9928.

29.

Geary

D. C.

Flinn

M. V.

(2001). Evolution of human parental behavior and the human family. Parenting: Science and Practice, 1, 5–61.

30.

Geher

Kaufman

S. B.

(2013). Mating intelligence unleashed: The role of the mind in sex, dating, and love. Oxford University Press.

31.

Gray

P. B.

Garcia

J. R.

(2013). Evolution & human sexual behavior. Harvard University Press.

32.

Hamilton

W. D.

(1990). Mate choice near or far. American Zoologist, 30(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/30.2.341

33.

Haselton

(2003). The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 34–47.

34.

Haselton

Buss

D. M.

Oubaid

Angleitner

(2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 3–23.

35.

Henningsen

D. D.

Henningsen

M. L. M.

Valde

K. S.

(2006). Gender differences in perceptions of women’s sexual interest during cross-sex interactions: An application and extension of cognitive valence theory. Sex Roles, 54, 821–829.

36.

Henrich

(2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(4), 244–260. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005

37.

Holder

D. W.

Durant

R. H.

Harris

T. L.

Daniel

J. H.

Obeidallah

Goodman

(2000). The association between adolescent spirituality and voluntary sexual activity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 295–302.

38.

Hrdy

S. B.

(2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Harvard University Press.

39.

Jasienska

(2017). Costs of reproduction, health, and life span in women. In Jasienska

Sherry

Holmes

(Eds.), The arc of life (pp. 159–176). Springer.

40.

Jonason

P. K.

Buss

D. M.

(2012). Avoiding entangling commitments: Tactics for implementing a short-term mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 606–610. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.015

41.

Kirby

(2007). Emerging answers 2007: Research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. https://thenationalcampaign.org/sites/default/files/resource-primary-download/EA2007_full_0.pdf

42.

Kruger

D. J.

Fisher

M. L.

De Baker

Kardum

Tetaz

Tifferet

(2015). Human life history dimensions in reproductive strategies are intuitive across cultures. Human Ethology Bulletin, 30, 109–120.

43.

Kuijper

Pen

Weissing

F. J.

(2012). A guide to sexual selection theory. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 43(1), 287–311. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160245

44.

Lassek

W. D.

Gaulin

S. J. C.

(2018). Do the low WHRs and BMIs judged most attractive indicate higher fertility? Evolutionary Psychology, 16(4), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918800063

45.

Lefkowitz

E. S.

Gillen

M. M.

Shearer

C. L.

Boone

T. L.

(2004). Religiosity, sexual behaviors, and sexual attitudes during emerging adulthood. Journal of Sex Research, 41(2), 150–159.

46.

Leitenberg

Henning

(1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496.

47.

Y. J.

Cohen

A. B.

Weeden

Kenrick

D. T.

(2010). Mating competitors increase religious beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 428–431.

48.

Lippa

R. A.

(2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 247–258.

49.

Mahoney

(2015). The evolutionary psychology of theology. In Slone

D. J.

Van Slyke

J. A.

(eds.), The attraction of religion. A new evolutionary psychology of religion (pp. 189–214). Bloomsbury Academic.

50.

Miller

(2001). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Anchor Books.

51.

Mongeau

P. A.

Hale

J. L.

Alles

(1994). An experimental investigation of accounts and attributions following sexual infidelity. Communication Monographs, 61, 326–344.

52.

Moon

J. W.

Krems

J. A.

Cohen

A. B.

(2018). Religious people are trusted because they are viewed as slow life-history strategists. Psychological Science, 29(6), 947–960. http://doi.org/10.1177/095679761775360

53.

Norenzayan

(2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.

54.

Palmer

C. T.

Begley

R. O.

(2015). Costly signaling theory, sexual selection, and the influence of ancestors on religious behavior. In Slone

D. J.

Van Slyke

J. A.

(Eds.), The attraction of religion. A new evolutionary psychology of religion (pp. 93–110). Bloomsbury Academic.

55.

Pazhoohi

Lang

Xygalatas

Grammer

(2016). Religious veiling as a mate-guarding strategy: Effects of environmental pressures on cultural practices. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0079-z

56.

Pazhoohi

Liddle

J. R.

(2012). Identifying feminine and masculine ranges for waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 6(2), 227–232. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0099212

57.

Pazhoohi

Macedo

A. F.

Arantes

(2017). The effect of religious clothing on gaze behavior: An eye-tracking experiment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(3), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1307748

58.

Philipov

(2007). Religion and fertility ideals, intentions and behaviour: A comparative study of European countries. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2007, 271–305. http://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2007s271

59.

Pillsworth

E. G.

Haselton

M. G.

(2006). Women’s sexual strategies: The evolution of long-term bonds and extrapair sex. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17, 59–100.

60.

Puts

D. A.

(2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.

61.

Ruse

(2008). Charles Darwin, Blackwell great minds. Blackwell.

62.

Sá-Pinto

Cardia

Campos

(2017). Sexual selection: A short review on its causes and outcomes, and activities to teach evolution and the nature of science. The American Biology Teacher, 79(2), 135–143.

63.

Schmitt

D. P.

(2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275.

64.

Schmitt

D. P.

Buss

D. M.

(1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1185–1204.

65.

Schmitt

D. P.

Couden

Baker

(2001). Sex, temporal context, and romantic desire: An experimental evaluation of sexual strategies theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 833–847.

66.

Shaver

J. H.

(2017). Why and how do religious individuals, and some religious groups, achieve higher relative fertility? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 324–327.

67.

Shaver

J. H.

Sibley

C. G.

Sosis

Galbraith

Bulbulia

(2019). Alloparenting and religious fertility: A test of the religious alloparenting hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(3), 315–324. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.004

68.

Singh

(1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307.

69.

Slone

D. J.

(2008). The attraction of religion: A sexual selectionist account. In Bulbulia

Sosis

Harris

Genet

(Eds.), The evolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques (pp. 1–4). Collins Foundation Press.

70.

Slone

D. J.

Van Slyke

J. A.

(Eds.). (2015). The attraction of religion: A new evolutionary psychology of religion. Bloomsbury Academic.

71.

Sosis

(2019). The building blocks of religious systems: Approaching religion as a complex adaptive system. In Georgiev

G. Y.

Smart

J. M.

Martinez

C. L. F.

Price

M. E.

(Eds.), Evolution, development and complexity: Multiscale evolutionary models of complex adaptive systems (pp. 421–449). Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00075-2_19

72.

Steadman

L. B.

Palmer

C. T.

(2008). The supernatural and natural selection: The evolution of religion. Paradigm Publishers.

73.

Stephenson

K. R.

Ahrold

T. K.

Meston

C. M.

(2010). The association between sexual motives and sexual satisfaction: Gender differences and categorical comparisons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 607–618.

74.

Stewart-Williams

Thomas

A. G.

(2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: Does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24(3), 137–168.

75.

Symons

(1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press.

76.

Tannahill

(1980). Sex in history. Stein and Day.

77.

Toma

C. L.

Hancock

J. T.

Ellison

N. B.

(2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1023–1036.

78.

Trivers

(1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell

(Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136–179). Aldine.

79.

Van Slyke

J. A

. (2015). Why don’t abstinence education programs work? (and other puzzles): Exploring causal variables in sexual selectionist theories of religion. In Slone

D. J.

Van Slyke

J. A.

(Eds.), The attraction of religion: A new evolutionary psychology of religion (pp. 11–28). Bloomsbury Academic.

80.

Van Slyke

J. A

. (2017). Can sexual selection theory explain the evolution of individual and group-level religious beliefs and behaviors? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7, 335–338. http://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249922

81.

Van Slyke

J. A.

Wasemiller

. (2017). Short-term mating strategies are negatively correlated with religious commitment: Exploring evolutionary variables for religiosity at a small Christian liberal arts college. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(3), 253–260. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0093-9

82.

Voland

Chasiotis

Schiefenhovel

(eds.) (2005). Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life. Rutgers University Press.

83.

Weeden

Cohen

A. B.

Kenrick

D. T.

(2008). Religious attendance as reproductive support. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 327–334.

84.

Weeden

Kurzban

(2013). What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 440–445.

85.

Weeden

Kurzban

Kenrick

D. T.

(2016). The elephant in the pews: Reproductive strategy and religiosity. In Liddle

J. R.

Shackelford

T. K.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and religion. Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199397747.013.13

86.

Wilson

M. L.

Miller

C. M.

Crouse

K. N.

(2017). Humans as a model species for sexual selection research. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20171320. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1320

87.

Zahavi

(1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press.