This study addresses the Bible as a coping tool in a sample of Swedish practising Christians living with cancer, gathered through a qualitative, in-depth interview study, on religious experiences and expressions that serve in the process of coping with a life situation changed by the disease. Through content analyses, and case studies combining tools from Pargament’s coping theory with, above all, role theory, it is shown that the Bible is a part of the coping process for approximately half of the informants. Furthermore, the Bible plays very different roles in the coping process, even for one single person. In the analyzed material, two different ways of using the Bible in the coping process occurs: Biblical passages as bearer of meaning for the informants, and the actual reading as such of the Bible. The former with two different functions in the coping process: (a) in the Biblical passages, see a direct appeal from God to the individual on a personal level and (b) a specific character in a Bible passage serves as an object of identification for the informant. In the coping process, the Bible provides coping tools for the identified coping methods meditative reading, role taking, and (re)interpretation of biblical passages (motivated by a religious tradition). As such, it mainly serves within the framework of the preserving comprehensive coping method. It is also shown that there are changes in the use of the Bible in connection with the changed life situation, as a result of the disease.
AlmaH. A.van UdenM. H. F. (1995). Sundén’s role theory of religion and symbolic interactionism. In HolmN. G.BelzenJ. A. (Eds.), Sundéns role theory: An impetus to contemporary psychology of religion (Religionsvetenskpliga skrifter nr 27, pp. 77–104). Turku, Finland: Åbo Akademi University.
2.
AlvessonM.SköldbergK. (2008). Tolkning och reflektion: vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod [Interpretation and reflection: philosophy of science, and qualitative method] (2nd ed.). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
3.
ArcuryT. A.QuandtS. A.McDonaldJ.BellR. A. (2000). Faith and health self-management of rural older adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 15, 55–74.
CrossleyM. (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the construction of meaning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
6.
GanzevoortR. R. (1994). Een Cruciaal Moment. Functie en verandering van geloof in een crisis [A crucial moment. Function and change of faith in a crisis]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universitet Utrecht.
7.
GanzevoortR. R. (1998a). Religious coping reconcidered, part one: An integrated approach. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26, 260–275.
8.
GanzevoortR. R. (1998b). Religious coping reconcidered, part two: A narrative reformulation. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 26, 276–286.
9.
HamiltonJ. B.MooreA. D.JohnsonK. A.KoenigH. G. (2013). Reading the Bible for guidance, comfort and strength during stressful life events. Nursing Research, 62, 178–184.
10.
HedestigO. (2006). Att leva med lokaliserad prostatacancer. “Oss män emellan.” [Living with localized prostate cancer]. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå Universitet.
11.
Hørdam AuskerN. (2012). Tid til forandring? Forhandlinger af religiøs kontinuitet, forandring of forbrug hos kraeftepatienter i Danmark [Time for change? Negotiating religious continuity, changes and consumption in Danish cancer patients]. Köpenhamn, Denmark: Det humanistiske fakultet, Københavns universitet.
12.
JohnsonS. D.WilliamsS. L.PickardJ. G. (2016). Trauma, religion, and social support among African American women. Social Work & Christianity, 43, 60–73.
13.
KällstadT. (1987). The application of the religio-psychological role theory. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26, 367–374.
14.
KrauseN.PargamentK. I. (2018). Reading the Bible, stressful life events, and hope: Assessing an overlooked coping resource. Journal of Religion and Health, 57, 1428–1439.
15.
KvaleS. (1997). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [The qualitative research interview]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
16.
LieblichA.Tuval-MashiachR.ZilberT. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. London: SAGE.
17.
LundmarkM. (2002). Bön och cancer. En religionspsykologisk studie av bönens uttryck och funktion hos cancersjuka troende kristna [Prayer and cancer. A study in psychology of religion of the expression and function of prayers of believing christians living with cancer]. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå Universitet.
18.
LundmarkM. (2010). When Mrs B Met Jesus during Radiotherapy: A single case study of a christic vision: psychological prerequisites and functions and considerations on narrative methodology. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32, 27–68.
19.
LundmarkM. (2015). Religious objects and the coping process: Case studies on prayer cloths as transitional objects in religious coping. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 37, 54–83.
20.
LundmarkM. (2016a). Sanctification of health care interventions as a coping method. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 1–23.
21.
LundmarkM. (2016b). Suffering for others as religious meaning-making: Varieties, prerequisites and functions in the coping process of a sample of practicing Christians living with cancer. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 19, 522–537.
22.
LundmarkM. (2017). Religiositet och coping: Religionspsykologiska studier av kristna med cancer [Religiosity and coping: Studies in psychology of religion of Christians living with cancer]. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå Universitet.
23.
MahoneyA.CarelsR. A.PargamentK. I.WachholtzA.Edwards LeeperL.KaplarM.FrutcheyR. (2005). The sanctification of the body and behavioural health patterns of college students. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 221–238.
24.
MalleyB. (2004). How the Bible works: An anthropological study of evangelical Biblicism. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
25.
McAdamsD. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: The Guilford Press.
26.
MertensD. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
27.
PargamentK. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
PargamentK. I.AnoG. G.WachholtzA. B. (2005). The religious dimension of coping: Advances in theory, research, and practice. In PauloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 560–580). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
SaarelainenS. -M. (2016). Coping-related themes in cancer stories of young Finnish adults. International Journal of Practical Theology, 20, 69–96.
30.
Stifoss-HanssenH. (1995). Roles constitute religious experience. Fiction and fact in Hjalmar Sundén’s Role theory, attribution theory and psychodynamic theory. In HolmN. G.BelzenJ. A. (Eds.), Sundéns role theory—An impetus to contemporary psychology of religion (Religionsvetenskpliga skrifter nr 27, pp. 105–127). Turku, Finland: Åbo Akademi University.
31.
SundénH. (1959). Religionen och Rollerna. Ett psykologiskt studium av fromheten [The religion and the roles. A psyhcological study of piety]. Stockholm, Sweden: Svenska kyrkans diakonistyrelses bokförlag.
32.
TorbjørnsenT. (2011). “Gud hjelpe meg!”: Religiøs mestring hos pasienter med Hodgkins sykdom. En empirisk, religionspsykologisk studie [“God help me!”: Religious coping in patients with Hodgkins disease. An empirical study in psychology of religion]. Oslo, Norway: Det teologiske Menighetsfakultet.
33.
VillageA. (2007). The Bible and lay people: An empirical approach to ordinary hermeneutics. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
34.
YardleyL. (2015). Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed.). London, England: SAGE, pp. 257–272.
