Curricular Choice and the Differential Prediction of the Tertiary-Academic Performance of Men and Women

Abstract

American research findings suggest that the tertiary-academic performance of men and women is predicted differentially in the sense that for the same high-school and aptitude-test performance, the actual grades achieved by women are higher than those predicted for them, and that for men, the situation is reversed. In the present study, three hierarchical regressions were performed to predict the extent of differential prediction for 329 men and 470 women who registered as first-year students at the University of the Orange Free State in 1992. With the two scales of the GSAT, matriculation symbol point total (MSPT), and a combination of these two predictors, gender (intercept) differences accounted for 4.55%, 2.36% and 2.18% of variance in accumulated mean curriculum percentage marks (MCPMs) over a three-year period. Next, hierarchical multiple regressions, in which the categorical variable of curricular choice was specified to enter the equation ahead of gender, were performed to predict the deviations of students' predicted MCPMs from their actual MCPMs (as indices of differential prediction). When cur-ricular choice was controlled through this semi-partial correlational approach, the percentage of these indices' variance that was explained by gender was reduced by between 53% and 78%. In the process the percentage of variance explained by gender was virtually wiped out: When the index of differential prediction was based on MSPT and a combination of the GSAT and MSPT, gender explained less than one per cent of the variance of these indices.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L.S.

West

S.G.

(1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, California: Sage

American College Testing Program. (1973). Assessing students on the way to college: Technical report for the ACT Assessment Program. Iowa City. Iowa: Author

Claassen

N.C.W.

De Beer

Hugo

H.L.E.

Meyer

H.M.

(1991). Manual for the General Scholastic Aptitude Test (GSAT). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council

Clark

M.J.

Grandy

(1984). Sex differences in the academic performance of Scholastic Aptitude Test takers (College Board Report 84–88). New York: College Entrance Examination Board

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd. ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum

Hewitt

B.N.

Goldman

R.D.

(1975). Oscam's razor slices through the myth that college women overachieve. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 325–330

Linn

(1973). Fair test use in selection. Review of Educational Research, 43, 139–161

Linn

R.L.

(1990). Admissions testing: recommended uses, validity, differential prediction, and coaching. Applied Measurement in Education, 3, 297–318

McCornack

R.L.

McLeod

M.M.

(1988). Gender bias in the prediction of college course performance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 321–331

10.

Pennock-Román

(1994). College major and gender differences in the prediction of college grades (ETS Research Report 94–2). New York: College Entrance Examination Board

11.

Ramist

Lewis

McCamley-Jenkins

(1994). Student group differences in predicting college grades: sex, language, and ethnic groups (Research Report No. 93–1). New York: College Entrance Examination Board

12.

Sawyer

(1986). Using demographic subgroup and dummy variable equations to predict college freshman grade average. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 131–145

13.

Strieker

L.J.

Rock

D.A.

Burton

N.W.

(1991). Sex differences in SAT predictions of college grades (Research Report No. 91–2). New York: College Entrance Examination Board

14.

Veldman

D.J.

(1968). Effects of sex, aptitudes, and attitudes on the academic achievement of college freshmen. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 245–249