The objective of this study was to determine the fairness of the 1992 South African version of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF, SA92) for various groups and to contribute to the knowledge on the profiles of specific career groups. The use of this questionnaire was evaluated on employees of a multicultural South African financial institution. The profiles of males and females were compared. So too were the profiles of individuals tested in their first language (Afrikaans or English) and individuals who indicated that their home language is an African language but who were tested in English. A comparison with the general population showed differences in primary and second-order factors, most of which could be explained in terms of the occupational type. Although there did not seem to be a need for specific norms, some cultural and gender-specific trends were found that should be considered when interpreting results on the 16PF, SA92. The factor structures of the total sample and the various subgroups were essentially the same and justified the use of the formulae for the second-order factors given in the manual. However, group-specific trends were also found in the constructs measured and these should be considered for the interpretation and usage of the scores on the primary and second-order traits.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamsF. (1994). The cross-cultural comparability of personality tests in South Africa: is it possible? Paper presented at the Congress on Psychometrics, Johannesburg.
2.
ArgenteroP. (1989). Second-order factor structure of Cattell's 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1043–1047.
3.
AugustynJ.C.D.Van WykA.J. (1988). Die sestienpersoonlikheidsfaktorvraelys as hulpmiddel by die takseersentrum (The 16PF Personality Test as an aid to the assessment centre). Journal of Industrial Psychology, 14, 25–27.
4.
BartramD. (1992). The personality of UK managers: 16PF norms for short-listed applicants. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 159–172.
5.
BoyleG.J. (1990). A review of the factor structure of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire and the Clinical Analysis Questionnaire. Psychological Test Bulletin, 3, 40–45.
6.
CattellH.B. (1989). The 16PF: personality in depth.. Champaign, Illinois: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc..
7.
CattellR.B.EberH.W.TatsuokaM.M. (1970). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF).. Champaign, Illinois: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc..
8.
CattellR.B.KrugS.E. (1986). The number of factors in the 16PF: a review of the evidence with special emphasis on methodological problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 509–522.
9.
ChildD. (1970). The essentials of factor analysis.. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10.
ClaassenN.C.W. (1987). Manual for the General Scholastic Aptitude Tests (GSAT) Intermediate Series.. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
11.
ClaassenN.C.W. (1995). Cross-cultural measurement in the human sciences. Unpublished manuscript, Human Sciences Research CouncilPretoria.
12.
CrawfordJ.R.AllanK.M.StephenD.W.ParkerD.M.BessonJ.A.O. (1989). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale — Revised (WAIS-R): factor structure in a U.K. sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1209–1212.
13.
FraneJ.JennrichR.I.SampsonP.F. (1979). BMDP4M. In DixonW.J.BrownM.B. (Eds), BMDP statistical software (pp. 656–684). Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
FrankG. (1992). The response of African Americans to the Rorschach: a review of the research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 317–325.
15.
KrugS.E.JohnsE.F. (1986). A large scale cross-validation of second-order personality structure defined by the 16PF. Psychological Reports, 59, 683–693.
16.
LandmanJ. (1989). Die ontwikkeling en standardisering van'n individuele intelligensieskaal vir Xhosasprekende leerlinge (The development and standardization of an individual intelligence scale for Xhosa-speaking pupils). Unpublished doctoral thesis, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education.
17.
LorrM.SuziedelisA. (1985). Profile patterns in the 16PF Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 767–773.
18.
MillerM.D.KrieshokT.S. (1989). Sex differences in the second-order factor structure of the 16PF: a confirmatory maximum likelihood analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 73–80.
19.
OwenK. (1991). Test bias: the validity of the Junior Aptitude Tests (JAT) for various population groups in South Africa regarding constructs measured. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 112–118.
20.
OwenK. (1992). Test -item bias: methods, findings and recommendations.. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
21.
PowersS.JonesP.B. (1984). Factorial invariance of the California Achievement Tests across race and sex. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 967–970.
22.
PrinslooC.H. (1992a). Manual for the use of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, South African 1992 version (16PF, SA92).. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
23.
PrinslooC.H. (1992b). Manual for the use of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, Form E (16PF, Form E).. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
24.
RetiefA. (1992). The cross-cultural utility of the SAPQ — bias or fruitful differences?South African Journal of Psychology, 22, 202–207.
25.
ReuterE.K. (1985). Higher-order analysis of the 16PF scores: an alternative method. Psychological Reports, 57, 564–566.
26.
RobinsonM. (1994). Distinguishing learning-disabled pupils with reading problems from ordinary pupils on the basis of the Junior South African Individual Scales (JSAIS). In van EedenR.RobinsonM.PosthumaA.B. (Eds), Studies on South African Individual Intelligence Scales (pp. 14–47). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
27.
RussellM.T.KarolD.L. (1994). The 16PF fifth edition administrator's manual.. Champaign, Illinois: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc..
28.
SchuergerJ.M.AllenL.C. (1986). Second-order factor structure common to five personality questionnaires. Psychological Reports, 58, 119–126.
29.
SmithG.A.DowlingP.J.BarryB. (1985). Australian managers' norms on the 16PF. Australian Psychologist, 20, 293–301.
30.
StumpfH. (1993). The factor structure of the Personality Research Form: a cross-national evaluation. Journal of Personality, 61, 27–48.
31.
TaylorT.R.BoeyensJ.C.A. (1991). The comparability of the scores of blacks and whites on the South African Personality Questionnaire: an exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 1–11.
32.
Van EedenR. (1991). Manual for the Senior South African Individual Scale — Revised (SSAIS-R). Part 1: background and standardization.. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
33.
Van EedenR. (1993). The validity of the Senior South African Individual Scale — Revised (SSAIS-R) for children whose mother tongue is an African language: private schools.. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
34.
Van EedenR.VisserD. (1992). The validity of the Senior South African Individual Scale-Revised (SSAIS-R) for different population groups. South African Journal of Psychology, 22, 163–171.
35.
WallbrownF.H.ReuterE.K.BarnettR.W. (1989). Motivational distortion on 16PF primaries by male felons. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 7–14.
36.
WhitworthR.H.PerryS.M. (1990). Comparison of Anglo- and Mexican-Americans on the 16PF administered in Spanish or English. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 857–863.
37.
WilsonD.DoolabhA.CooneyJ.KhalpeyM.SiddiquiS. (1990). A cross-cultural validation of the Personality Research Form in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 1–12.
