The article is a reply to Taylor and Boeyens's (1990, 1991) investigation of the cross-cultural utility of the SAPQ. Although their conclusions about a lack of evidence favouring utility are agreed with, it is argued that certain important variables operate in the domain of cross-cultural personality assessment, necessitating a different interpretation of traditional concepts relating to bias and item incomparability. The guiding assumption of a search for dimensions that remain unitary or invariant is also questioned. Based on this analysis, a pragmatic test construction strategy is advocated where causes behind differences in patterns of responding are investigated in order to yield core constructs that may vary in cross-cultural application. Such a test construction strategy also has the potential of yielding indices of acculturation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngoffW.H.FordS.F. (1973). Item-race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 95–106
2.
BarretP.EysenckS. (1984). The assessment of personality factors across 25 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 615–632
3.
BerryJ.W. (1980). Ecological analyses for cross-cultural psychology. In WarrenN. (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 157–189). London: Academic
4.
BrislinR.W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216
5.
BrislinR.W. (1976). Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International Journal of Psychology, 11, 215–229
6.
BrislinR.W. (1986a). The wording and translation of research instruments. In LonnerW.BerryJ.W. (Eds), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). London: Sage
7.
BrislinR.W. (1986b). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide.Beverly Hills, California: Sage
8.
EavesL.J.EysenckH. (1977). A genotype-environmental model for psychoticism. Advances in behavior research and therapy, 1, 5–26
9.
FrijdaN.JahodaG. (1966). On the scope and method of cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 109–127
10.
GoldschmidtW. (1966). Comparative functionalism.Berkeley: University of California Press
HofstedeG. (1991). Empirical models of cultural differences. In BleichrodtN.DrenthJ.D. (Eds), Contemporary issues in cross-cultural psychology.Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger
15.
IrwinS.H.CarrollW.K. (1980). Testing and assessment across cultures. In Handbook of cross-cultural psychology Vol II: Methodology.Boston: Allyn & Bacon Inc.
16.
KokF.G.MellenberghJ.G.van der FlierH. (1985). Detecting experimentally induced item bias using the iterative logit method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 295–303
17.
PoortingaY.H. (1983). Psychometric approaches to intergroup comparison: The problem of equivalence. In IrvineS.H.BerryJ.W. (Eds), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 237–257) New York: Plenum
18.
PowellA.RoyceJ.R. (1981). On overview of a muftifactor-system theory of personality and individual differences III: Life span development and the heredity environment issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1161–1173
19.
RetiefA. (1987). Thematic apperception testing across cultures: tests of selection versus tests of inclusion. South African Journal of Psychology, 17, 47–55
20.
RetiefA. (1988). Method and theory in cross-cultural psychological assessment.Pretoria. Human Sciences Research Council
21.
RetiefA. (1990). Value management in workplaces: The intersection of culture, values and business. Unpublished paper, Garry Whyte Associates Management Seminar: New HR perspectives. Carlton Hotel, March 1990
22.
SearsR.R. (1961). Transcultural variables and conceptual equivalence. In KaplanB. (Ed.), Studying personally cross-culturally (pp. 445–456). New York: Row, Peterson
23.
SechrestL.FayT.L.ZaidiS.M.H. (1972). Problems of translation in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 3, 41–56
24.
SternbergR.J. (1988). A triarchic view of intelligence in cross-cultural perspective. In IrvineS.H.BerryJ.W. (Eds), Human abilities in cultural context (pp. 60–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
25.
TaylorT.R.BoeyensJ. (1990). A comparison of black and white responses to the South African Personality Questionnaire. NIPR Report Per-440). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
26.
TaylorT.R.BoeyensJ. (1991). The comparability of the scores of blacks and whites on the South African Personality Questionnaire: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 1–11
27.
TaylorT.R. (1987). Test bias: The roles and responsibilities of test user and lest publisher (NIPR Special Report Pers-424). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
28.
The Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164
29.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
