The Senior South African Individual Scale-Revised (SSAIS-R) was developed jointly for coloured, white and Indian pupils. The functioning of the scale for a sample in which the three population groups were represented proportionally is described in the test manual. In the present study the validity of the scale for each group was investigated by performing factor analyses and by obtaining correlations with other intelligence tests and examination scores. The results demonstrated the construct and predictive validity of the SSAIS-R for each group. Although the factor structures corresponded for the groups, coefficients of congruence indicated that the construct being measured differed to some extent for some age groups. Differences in correlations with external criteria between the various groups imply that the value of the scale for classification according to intellectual level and for the prediction of academic achievement also varied to some extent for the respective groups. The scale may safely be used in educational situations to differentiate between pupils within any one population group. However, the results of the study should be kept in mind when norms are used to differentiate between members of the three population groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiA. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan
2.
ChildD. (1970). The essentials of factor analysis.London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
3.
ClaassenN.C.W. (1990). The comparability of General Scholastic Aptitude Test scores across different population groups. South African Journal of Psychology, 20, 80–92
4.
ClaassenN.C.W.CudeckR. (1985). Die faktorstruktuur van die Nuwe Suid-Afrikaanse Groeptoets (NSAG) by verskillende bevolkingsgroepe (The factor structure of the New South African Group Test (NSAGT) for different population groups). South African Journal of Psychology, 15, 1–10
5.
CrawfordJ.R.AllanK.M.StephenD.W.ParkerD.M.BessonJ.A.O. (1989). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R): Factor structure in a U.K. sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1209–1212
6.
CrawfordJ.R.JackA.M.MorrisonF.M.AllanK.M.NelsonH.E. (1990). The U.K. factor structure of the WAIS-R is robust and highly congruent with the U.S.A. standardisation sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 643–644
7.
DaiX.GongY.ZhongL. (1990). Factor analysis of the mainland Chinese version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 31–34
8.
EysenckH.J. (1971). The IQ argument: Race, intelligence and education.New York: Library Press
9.
FigueroaR.A.SassenrathJ.M. (1989). A longitudinal study of the predictive validity of the System of Multicultural Pluralistic Assessment (SOMPA). Psychology in the Schools, 26, 5–19
10.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.London: Heinemann
11.
GhiselliE.E.CampbellJ.P.ZedeckS. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences.San Francisco: Freeman
12.
Groth-MarnatG. (1984). Handbook of psychological assessment.New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
13.
HennessyJ.J.MerrifieldP.R. (1976). A comparison of the factor structures of mental abilities in four ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 754–759
14.
InsuaA.M. (1983). WAIS-R factor structures in two cultures. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 14, 427–438
15.
JensenA.R. (1979). G: Outmoded theory or unconquered frontier?Creative Science and Technology, 2, 16–29
16.
JensenA.R. (1980). Bias in mental testing.London: Methuen
17.
JensenA.R. (1985). The nature of the black-white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 193–263
18.
JensenA.R. (1986). Major contributions, g: Artifact or reality?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 301–331
19.
JensenA.R.ReynoldsC.R. (1982). Race, social class and ability patterns on the WISC-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 423–438
20.
JohnsonS.T. (1987). Test fairness and bias: Measuring academic achievement among black youth. The Urban League Review, 11, 76–92
21.
KaufmanA.S. (1975). Factor analysis of the WISC-R at eleven age levels between 6 1/2 and 16 1/2 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 135–147
22.
KaufmanA.S.KaufmanN.L. (1977). Clinical evaluation of young children with the McCarthy scales.New York: Grune & Stratton
23.
LandmanJ. (1989). Die ontwikkeling en standaardisering van 'n individuele intelligensieskaal vir Xhosasprekende leerlinge (The development and standardization of an individual intelligence scale for Xhosa-speaking pupils). Unpublished doctoral thesis, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education
24.
MackenzieB. (1984). Explaining race differences in IQ: The logic, the methodology, and the evidence. American Psychologist, 39, 1214–1233
25.
MadgeE.M. (1981). Manual for the Junior South African Individual Scales (JSAIS). Part 1: Development and standardization.Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
26.
MadgeE.M.Van der WesthuizenJ.G. (1982). Die Senior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skoal (SSAIS) as kliniese hulpmiddel [The Senior South African Individual Scale (SSAIS) as a clinical aid]. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
27.
MercerJ.R. (1984). What is a racially and culturally nondiscriminatory test? In ReynoldsC.R.BrownR.T. (Eds), Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 293–356). New York: Plenum Press
28.
MieleF. (1979). Cultural bias in the WISC. Intelligence, 3, 149–164
29.
NunnallyJ.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
30.
OaklandT. (1983). Concurrent and predictive validity estimates for the WISC-R IQs and ELPs by racial-ethnic and SES groups. School Psychology Review, 12, 57–61
31.
OwenK. (1991). Test bias: The validity of the Junior Aptitude Tests (JAT) for various population groups in South Africa regarding constructs measured. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 112–118
32.
ParkerK. (1983). Factor analysis of the WAIS-R at nine age levels between 16 and 74 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 302–308
33.
PoteatG.M.WuenschK.L.GreggN.B. (1988). An investigation of differential prediction with the WISC-R. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 59–68
34.
PowersS.JonesP.B. (1984). Factorial invariance of the California Achievement Tests across race and sex. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 967–970
35.
PyleD.W. (1979). Intelligence: An introduction.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
36.
ReynoldsC.R. (1980). Differential construct validity of intelligence as popularly measured: Correlations of age with raw scores on the WISC-R for blacks, whites, males and females. Intelligence, 4, 371–379
37.
RichardsonK.SpearsD. (Eds) (1972). Race, culture and intelligence.Harmondsworth: Penguin
38.
RobinsonM. (1989). Bylae tot die Handleiding vir die Junior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skale (JSAIS): Tegniese besonderhede en normtabelle vir 6- lot 8-jarige leerlinge (Appendix to the Manual for the Junior South African Individual Scales (JSAIS): Technical details and tables of norms for 6- to 8-year-old pupils). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
39.
RodriguezV.L.DiazJ.O. Prewitt (1990). Correlations among GPA and scores on the Spanish version of WISC-R and the Woodcock-Johnson Achievement subtests for 10- to 12-year-old Puerto Rican children. Psychological Reports, 66, 563–566
40.
RouseyA. (1990). Factor structure of the WISC-R Mexicano. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 351–357
41.
SandovalJ. (1979). The WISC-R and internal evidence of test bias with minority groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 919–927
42.
SAS Institute Incorporated (1985). SAS user's guide: Statistics (5th ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute
43.
SattlerJ.M. (1982). Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
44.
ScarrS. (1981). Race, social class, and individual differences in I.Q.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
45.
ScheunemanJ.D. (1981). A new look at bias in aptitude tests. New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 12, 3–35
46.
SmitG.J. (s.a.) Psigometrika: Aspekte van toetsgebruik (Psychometrics: Aspects of test usage). Pretoria: Haum
47.
SternbergR.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence.Cambrige: Cambridge University Press
48.
Van EedenR. (1988). Die herstandaardisering van die Senior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skaal (SSAIS) vir blanke leerlinge en die standaardisering daarvan vir kleurling- en Indiërleerlinge: Itemontledingsverslag (The restandardization of the Senior South African Individual Scale (SSAIS) for white pupils and the standardization thereof for brown and Indian pupils: Item analysis report) (Office report 1988/21). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
49.
Van EedenR. (1990). Verslag oor die realisasie van die steekproef vir die standaardisering van die hersiene Senior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skaal (SSAIS) en die samestelling van die normgroepe (Report on the realization of the sample for the standardization of the revised Senior South African Individual Scale (SSAIS) and the compilation of the norm groups) (Office report 1990/16). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
50.
Van EedenR. (1991a). Die geldigheid van die Senior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skaal-Hersien (SSAIS-R) vir verskillende bevolkingsgroepe (The validity of the Senior South African Individual Scale-Revised (SSAIS-R) for different population groups). Unpublished master's dissertation, University of South AfricaPretoria
51.
Van EedenR. (1991b). Manual for the Senior South African Individual Scale-Revised (SSAIS-R). Part 1: Background and standardization.Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
52.
VernonP.E. (1979). Intelligence: Heredity and environment.San Francisco: W.H. Freeman
53.
WechslerD. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins
54.
WilgoshL.MulcahyR.WattersB. (1986). Assessing intellectual performance of culturally different, Inuit children with the WISC-R. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 18, 270–277
55.
LandmanJ. (1989). Die ontwikkeling en standaardisering van 'n individuele intelligensieskaal vir Xhosasprekende leerlinge (The development and standardization of an individual intelligence scale for Xhosa-speaking pupils). Unpublished doctoral thesis, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education
56.
MackenzieB. (1984). Explaining race differences in IQ: The logic, the methodology, and the evidence. American Psychologist, 39, 1214–1233
57.
MadgeE.M. (1981). Manual for the Junior South African Individual Scales (JSAIS). Part 1: Development and standardization.Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
58.
MadgeE.M.Van der WesthuizenJ.G. (1982). Die Senior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skoal (SSAIS) as kliniese hulpmiddel [The Senior South African Individual Scale (SSAIS) as a clinical aid]. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
59.
MercerJ.R. (1984). What is a racially and culturally nondiscriminatory test? In ReynoldsC.R.BrownR.T. (Eds), Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 293–356). New York: Plenum Press
60.
MieleF. (1979). Cultural bias in the WISC. Intelligence, 3, 149–164
61.
NunnallyJ.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
62.
OaklandT. (1983). Concurrent and predictive validity estimates for the WISC-R IQs and ELPs by racial-ethnic and SES groups. School Psychology Review, 12, 57–61
63.
OwenK. (1991). Test bias: The validity of the Junior Aptitude Tests (JAT) for various population groups in South Africa regarding constructs measured. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 112–118
64.
ParkerK. (1983). Factor analysis of the WAIS-R at nine age levels between 16 and 74 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 302–308
65.
PoteatG.M.WuenschK.L.GreggN.B. (1988). An investigation of differential prediction with the WISC-R. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 59–68
66.
PowersS.JonesP.B. (1984). Factorial invariance of the California Achievement Tests across race and sex. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 967–970
67.
PyleD.W. (1979). Intelligence: An introduction.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
68.
ReynoldsC.R. (1980). Differential construct validity of intelligence as popularly measured: Correlations of age with raw scores on the WISC-R for blacks, whites, males and females. Intelligence, 4, 371–379
69.
RichardsonK.SpearsD. (Eds) (1972). Race, culture and intelligence.Harmondsworth: Penguin
70.
RobinsonM. (1989). Bylae tot die Handleiding vir die Junior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skale (JSAIS): Tegniese besonderhede en normtabelle vir 6- lot 8-jarige leerlinge (Appendix to the Manual for the Junior South African Individual Scales (JSAIS): Technical details and tables of norms for 6- to 8-year-old pupils). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
71.
RodriguezV.L.DiazJ.O. Prewitt (1990). Correlations among GPA and scores on the Spanish version of WISC-R and the Woodcock-Johnson Achievement subtests for 10- to 12-year-old Puerto Rican children. Psychological Reports, 66, 563–566
72.
RouseyA. (1990). Factor structure of the WISC-R Mexicano. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 351–357
73.
SandovalJ. (1979). The WISC-R and internal evidence of test bias with minority groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 919–927
74.
SAS Institute Incorporated (1985). SAS user's guide: Statistics (5th ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute
75.
SattlerJ.M. (1982). Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
76.
ScarrS. (1981). Race, social class, and individual differences in I.Q.Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
77.
ScheunemanJ.D. (1981). A new look at bias in aptitude tests. New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 12, 3–35
78.
SmitG.J. (s.a.) Psigometrika: Aspekte van toetsgebruik (Psychometrics: Aspects of test usage). Pretoria: Haum
79.
SternbergR.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence.Cambrige: Cambridge University Press
80.
Van EedenR. (1988). Die herstandaardisering van die Senior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skaal (SSAIS) vir blanke leerlinge en die standaardisering daarvan vir kleurling- en Indiërleerlinge: Itemontledingsverslag (The restandardization of the Senior South African Individual Scale (SSAIS) for white pupils and the standardization thereof for brown and Indian pupils: Item analysis report) (Office report 1988/21). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
81.
Van EedenR. (1990). Verslag oor die realisasie van die steekproef vir die standaardisering van die hersiene Senior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skaal (SSAIS) en die samestelling van die normgroepe (Report on the realization of the sample for the standardization of the revised Senior South African Individual Scale (SSAIS) and the compilation of the norm groups) (Office report 1990/16). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
82.
Van EedenR. (1991a). Die geldigheid van die Senior Suid-Afrikaanse Individuele Skaal-Hersien (SSAIS-R) vir verskillende bevolkingsgroepe (The validity of the Senior South African Individual Scale-Revised (SSAIS-R) for different population groups). Unpublished master's dissertation, University of South AfricaPretoria
83.
Van EedenR. (1991b). Manual for the Senior South African Individual Scale-Revised (SSAIS-R). Part 1: Background and standardization.Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
84.
VernonP.E. (1979). Intelligence: Heredity and environment.San Francisco: W.H. Freeman
85.
WechslerD. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins
86.
WilgoshL.MulcahyR.WattersB. (1986). Assessing intellectual performance of culturally different, Inuit children with the WISC-R. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 18, 270–277
