This study reports an experiment which examines semantic representation in lexical decisions as a source of interconnection between words in bilingual memory. Lexical decision times were compared for interlingual polysemes such as HAND which share spelling and meaning in both languages, and interlingual homographs such as KIND which share spelling but not meaning. The main result was faster “response times for polysemes than for interlingual homographs. Current theories of monolingual word recognition and bilingual semantic representation are discussed, and the findings are accommodated within the model of bilingual word recognition proposed by Doctor and Klein.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportD.A. (1985). Speech production and comprehension: One lexicon or two? In PrinzW.SandersA.F. (Eds), Cognition and motor processes.Berlin: Springer-Verlag
2.
BalotaD.ChumbleyJ. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–357
3.
BalotaD.ChumbleyJ. (1985). The locus of the word frequency effect in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89–106
4.
BeckerC.A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 556–566
5.
BeckerC.A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory and Cognition, 8, 489–512
6.
BeckerC.A. (1985). What do we know about context effects? In BesnerD.WallerT.G.MacKinnonG.E. (Eds), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 125–166). Academic Press
7.
ChumbleyJ.I.BalotaD.A. (1984). A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 12, 590–606
8.
ClarkH.H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359
9.
DoctorE.A.KleinD. (1991). Phonological processing in bilingual word recognition. To appear In HarrisC.J. (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals.Elsevier
10.
ForsterK.I. (1978). Accessing the mental lexicon. In WalkerE.W. (Ed.), Explorations in the biology of language (pp. 139–174). Montgomery, Vt.: Bradford
11.
ForsterK.I.BednallE.S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 4, 53–61
12.
GerardL.D.ScarboroughD.L. (1989). Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15(2), 305–315
13.
GordonB. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 24–44
14.
GordonB. (1985). Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 631–645
15.
HarrisM.ColtheartM. (1986). Language processing in children and adults: An introduction.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
16.
JastrzembskiJ.E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 278–305
17.
JastrzembskiJ.E.StannersR.F. (1975). Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed. Journal of Verbalism Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 634–637
18.
KirsnerK.SmithM.C.LockhartR.S.KingM.L.JainM. (1984). The bilingual lexicon: Language specific units in an integrated network. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 519–539
19.
KuceraH.FrancisW.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English.Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press
20.
LyonsJ. (1981). Language and Linguistics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
21.
McCannR.S.BesnerD. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 14–24
22.
McCannR.S.BesnerD.DavelaarE. (1988). Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access?Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 14, 693–706
23.
McClellandJ.L.RumelhartD.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407
24.
McClellandJ.L.RumelhartD.E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159–188
25.
MonsellS.DoyleM.C.HaggardP.N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71
26.
MortonJ. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178
27.
MortonJ. (1970). A functional model for memory. In NormanD.A. (Ed.), Models of human memory.New York: Academic Press
28.
MortonJ. (1979a). Word recognition. In MortonJ.MarshallJ. (Eds), Psycholinguistics 2: Structures and processes.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
29.
MortonJ. (1979b). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In KolersP.A.WrolstadM.BoumaH. (Eds), Processing of visible language, Vol. 1 (pp. 259–268). New York: Plenum
30.
MortonJ. (1982). Disintegrating the lexicon: An information processing approach. In MehlerJ.WalkerE.C.T.GarrettM. (Eds), Perspectives on mental representation.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
31.
PaapK.R.McDonaldJ.E.SchvaneveldtR.W.NoelR.W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In ColtheartM. (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 221–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
32.
PaivioA.DesrochersA. (1980). A dual-coding approach to bilingual memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 388–399
33.
PotterM.C.SoK.-W.Von EckardtB.M.FeldmanL.B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 23–28
34.
RubensteinH.GarfieldL.MillikanJ.A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487–494
35.
SeidenbergM.S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30
36.
SeidenbergM.S.McClellandJ.1988 (in preparation). Visual word recognition and pronunciation: A computational model and its implications
