Understanding Intra-Group Variations in Prejudice — The Role of Perceived Legitimacy and Stability

Abstract

Dutch

Social Identity Theory predicts that the pattern of intergroup behaviour is a function of the relative status of the groups involved, and the perceived security of this hierarchy. Insecurity of social identity arises if the intergroup situation is seen as unstable and/or illegitimate. In this paper the authors suggest that these factors may also contribute to intra-group variations in outgroup discrimination and hostility. This was empirically investigated using black and white students from a South African university, at a time when social change appeared imminent. A measure of perceptions of status, stability and legitimacy was developed, and the effect of these perceptions on attitudes and various measures of discrimination tested. A consistent finding was that of the white subjects, those who perceived the intergroup situation as illegitimate, gave significantly less discriminatory responses than did those who perceived it as legitimate. The results provide support for some of the theoretical predictions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno

T.W.

Frenkel-Brunswik

Levinson

D.J.

Sanford

R.N.

(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

Allport

G.W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

Caddick

(1982). Perceived illegitimacy and intergroup relations. In Tajfel

(Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cantril

(1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Finchilescu

(1991). Social Identity Theory and intergroup attributions. D.Phil, thesis, Oxford University.

Hogg

M.A.

Abrams

(1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge.

Moscovici

(1972). Society and theory in social psychology. In Israel

Tajfel

(Eds), The context of social psychology. London: Academic Press.

Mummendey

Schreiber

H-J.

(1984). Social comparison, similarity and ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(2), 231–233.

Rokeach

(Ed.) (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.

10.

SAS (1988). SAS/STAT Software, Release 6.03. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

11.

Skevington

S.M.

(1980). Intergroup relations and social change within a nursing context. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 201–213.

12.

Skevington

S.M.

(1981). Intergroup relations and nursing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 43–59.

13.

Steiner

I.D.

(1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 94–108.

14.

Tajfel

(1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In Israel

Tajfel

(Eds), The context of social psychology. London: Academic Press.

15.

Tajfel

(1978). The psychological structure of intergroup relations. In Tajfel

(Ed.), Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.

16.

Tajfel

(1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Tajfel

Turner

(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin

W.G.

Worchel

(Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole.

18.

Turner

(1978). Social categorization and social discrimination in the mammal group paradigm. In Tajfel

(Ed.), Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.

19.

Turner

Brown

(1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In Tajfel

(Ed.), Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.

20.

van Knippenberg

A.F.M.

(1984). Intergroup differences in group perceptions. In Tajfel

(Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

van Knippenberg

van Oers

(1984). Social identity and equity concerns in intergroup perceptions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 351–361.