Although Erickson did not postulate a theory of hypnosis or of human functioning, the work of Ericksonian hypnotherapists can be seen to embody a common epistemology or way of thinking about hypnosis and about treatment. It is shown in this paper that this epistemology adheres to the tenets of a traditional Newtonian conception of science and that it suffers from the limitations inherent in this scientific tradition. Attempts to extricate Ericksonian hypnosis from these limitations have been largely unsuccessful because they have been made from within the existing epistemology. This paper shows that the incorporation of Ericksonian ways of working into an encompassing ecosystemic (non-Newtonian) epistemology might be profitable in circumventing the limitations of Newtonian science in the field of hypnosis and hypnotherapy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonH.GoolishianH.A. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27, 371–393.
2.
AraozD.L. (1985). The new hypnosis. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
3.
AuerswaldE.H. (1987). Epistemological confusion in family therapy and research. Family Process, 26, 317–330.
4.
BandlerR.GrinderJ. (1975). The structure of magic. Vol. I. Palo Alto: Science & Behavior Books.
5.
BarberJ. (1977). Rapid induction analgesia: A clinical reportAmerican Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 19, 138–147.
6.
BatesonG.JacksonD.D.HaleyJ.WeaklandJ.H. (1973). Towards a theory of schizophrenia. In JacksonD.D. (Ed.), Communication, family and marriage. Vol. I. Palo Alto: Science & Behavior Books.
7.
BerneE. (1972). What do you say after you say hello?New York: Grove.
8.
BoothP. (1989, September). Can we trust the unconscious? Paper presented at the 1st European Congress of Ericksonian Hypnosis and Psychotherapy, Heidelberg, Germany.
9.
CalofD.L. (1985). Hypnosis in marital therapy: Toward a transgenerational approach. In ZeigJ.K. (Ed.). Ericksonian psychotherapy. Vol II. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
10.
ColangeloJ.J. (1987). The new hypnosis: Enriching your therapeutic armamentarium. Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnotherapy and Hypnosis, 8, 65–71.
DellP.F. (1982). Beyond homeostasis: Towards a concept of coherence. Family Process, 21, 21–41.
13.
DellP.F. (1985). Understanding Bateson and Maturana: Toward a biological foundation for the social sciences. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 1–20.
14.
DiamondM.J. (1988). Accessing archiac involvement: Toward unraveling the mystery of Erickson's hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, 141–156.
15.
DolanY.M. (1985). A path with a heart. Ericksonian utilization with resistant and chronic clients. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
16.
EfranJ.LukensM.D. (1985). The world according to Humberto Maturana. The Family Therapy Networker, 9(3), 23–28, 72–75.
17.
EricksonM.H. (1980). An introduction to the study and application of hypnosis for pain control. In RossiE.L. (Ed.), The collected papers of Milton H. Erickson on hypnosis. Vol IV. New York: Irvington.
18.
EricksonM.H. (1985). Life refraining in hypnosis. The seminars, workshops and lectures of Milton H. Erickson. Vol II. New York: Irvington.
19.
EricksonM.H.RossiE.L. (1980). Varieties of double bind. In RossiE.L. (Ed.). The collected papers of Milton H. Erickson on hypnosis. Vol. 1. New York: Irvington.
20.
FeldmanJ.B. (1988). The utilization of cognition in psychotherapy: A comparison of Ericksonian and cognitive therapies. In LanktonS.R.ZeigJ.K. (Eds), Research, comparisons and medical applications of Ericksonian techniques. Ericksonian Monographs No. 4 New York: Brunner/Mazel.
21.
FourieD.P. (1988). Hypnosis in dental practice: From awkward add-on to smooth integration. Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa, 43, 141–146.
22.
FourieD.P. (1989, September). ‘Indirect’ suggestion: Ecosystemic considerations. Paper presented at the 1st European Congress of Ericksonian Hypnosis and Psychotherapy, Heidelberg, Germany.
23.
FourieD.P. (1990a). Simulation in hypnosis research: The ‘hidden’ role of attribution of meaning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 560–562.
24.
FourieD.P. (1990b, August). The ecosystemic approach to hypnosis. Invited address presented at the 5th European Congress of Hypnosis in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Konstanz, Germany.
25.
FourieD.P.LifschitzS. (1985). Hypnotic behaviour: Mutual qualification. South African Journal of Psychology, 15, 77–80.
26.
FourieD.P.LifschitzS. (1987). Ein ökosystemischer Ansatz der Hypnose: rationale Kerngedanken und einige Folgerungen. Experimentelle und klinische Hypnose. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hypnose, 3(1), 1–12.
27.
FourieD.P.LifschitzS. (1988). Not seeing the wood for the trees: Implications of susceptibility testing. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 166–177.
28.
FourieD.P.LifschitzS. (1989). Ecosystemic hypnosis: Ideas and therapeutic application. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, 99–107.
29.
GesterP.W. (1990, July). Symbol, metaphor, vision — A hypnosystemic model for psychosomatic and other diseases. Workshop presented at the Biennial International Conference of the SA Institute for Marital and Family Therapy, Broederstroom.
30.
GilliganS.G. (1985). Generative autonomy: Principles of an Ericksonian Hypnotherapy. In ZeigJ.K. (Ed.), Ericksonian psychotherapy. Vol I. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
31.
GodinJ. (1988). Evocation and indirect suggestion in the communication patterns of Milton H. Erickson. In LanktonS.R.ZeigJ.K. (Eds), Research, comparisons and medical applications of Ericksonian techniques. Ericksonian Monographs No. 4, New York: Brunner/Mazel.
32.
GruzelierJ.H.BrowT.D. (1985). Psychophysiological evidence for a state theory of hypnosis and susceptibility. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29, 287–302.
33.
HaleyJ. (1958). An interactional explanation of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1, 41–57.
34.
HaleyJ. (1963). Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune & Stratton.
35.
HammondD.C. (1985). An instrument for utilizing client interests and individualizing hypnosis. In LanktonS.R. (Ed.), Elements and dimensions of an Ericksonian approach. Ericksonian Monographs. No. 1. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
36.
HammondD.C. (1988). Will the real Milton Erickson please stand up?. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 26, 173–181.
37.
HavensR.A. (1985). The wisdom of Milton H. Erickson. New York: Irvington.
38.
HeapM. (1988). Born-again Mesmerism?. The Psychologist, 1, 261–262.
39.
HoffmanL. (1981). Foundations of family therapy. A conceptual framework for systems change. New York: Basic Books.
40.
HoffmanL. (1985). Beyond power and control: Toward a ‘second order’ family systems therapy. Family Systems Medicine, 3, 381–396.
41.
ImmelmanA.P.J. (1984). Rapid induction analgesia: An Ericksonian hypnotic procedure in dental practice. Unpublished masters dissertation. Port Elizabeth: University of Port Elizabeth.
42.
KeeneyB.P. (1979). Ecosystemic epistemology: An alternative paradigm for diagnosis. Family Process, 18, 117–129.
43.
KeeneyB.P. (1982). What is an epistemology of family therapy?. Family Process, 21, 153–168.
44.
KeeneyB.P. (1983). Aesthetics of change. New York: Guilford.
45.
KeeneyB.P.RossJ.M. (1985). Mind in therapy. Constructing systemic family therapies. New York: Basic Books.
46.
KirmayerL.J. (1988). Word magic and the rhetoric of common sense: Erickson's metaphors for mind. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 26, 157–172.
47.
LanktonC.H. (1985). Elements of an Ericksonian approach. In LanktonS.R. (Ed.), Elements and dimensions of an Ericksonian approach. Ericksonian Monographs No. 1. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
48.
LanktonS.R. (1985a). A state of consciousness model of Ericksonian hypnosis. In LanktonS.R. (Ed.), Elements and dimensions of an Ericksonian approach. Ericksonian Monographs No. 1. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
49.
LanktonS.R. (1985b). Multiple-embedded metaphor and diagnosis. In ZeigJ.K. (Ed.), Ericksonian psychotherapy. Vol. I. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
50.
LanktonS.R.LanktonC.H. (1983). The answer within: A clinical framework of Ericksonian hypnotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
51.
LanktonS.R.LanktonC.H. (1986). Enchantment and intervention in family therapy. Training in Ericksonian approaches. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
52.
LearyT. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.
53.
LifschitzS.FourieD.P. (1985). The hypnotic situation — A systems approach. Reports from the Psychology Department No. 13. Pretoria: UNISA.
54.
LoriedoC. (1990, August). Hypnosis and family therapy. Workshop presented at the 5th European Congress of Hypnosis in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Konstanz, Germany.
55.
MatthewsW.J. (1985). A cybernetic model of Ericksonian hypnotherapy: One hand draws the other. In LanktonS.R. (Ed.), Elements and dimensions of an Ericksonian approach. Ericksonian Monographs No. 1. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
56.
MatthewsW.J. (1989, September). Possibility therapy. Workshop presented at the 1st European Congress of Ericksonian Hypnosis and Psychotherapy, Heidelberg, Germany.
57.
MaturanaH.R. (1975). The organization of the living: A theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7, 313–332.
58.
MaturanaH.R.VarelaF.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: Reidel.
59.
O'HanlonB. (1985). A study guide of frameworks of Milton Erickson's hypnosis and therapy. In ZeigJ.K. (Ed.), Ericksonian psychotherapy. Vol. I. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
60.
RittermanM. (1983). Using hypnosis in family therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61.
RittermanM. (1985). Family context, symptom induction and therapeutic counterinduction: Breaking the spell of a dysfunctional rapport. In ZeigJ.K. (Ed.), Ericsonian Psychotherapy. Vol. II. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
62.
SarbinT.R.CoeW.C. (1972). Hypnosis. A social psychological analysis of influence communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
63.
SchmidtG. (1985a). Systemische Familientherapie als zirkuläre Hypnotherapie. Familiendynamik, 3, 241–264.
64.
SchmidtG. (1985b). Gedanken zum Ericksonschen Ansatz aus einer systemorientierten Perspektive. In PeterB. (Ed.), Hypnose und Hypnotherapie nach Milton H. Erickson. München: Pfeiffer-Verlag.
65.
SchmidtG.TrenkleB. (1985). An integration of Ericksonian techniques with concepts of family therapy. In ZeigJ.K. (Ed.), Ericksonian Psychotherapy. Vol. II. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
66.
SchwartzmanJ. (1984). Family theory and the scientific method. Family Process, 23, 223–236.
67.
ScroggsK.A. (1986). Ericksonian approaches within family hypnotherapy. Individual Psychotherapy, 42, 506–520.
68.
SimonR. (1985). Deeper, deeper, deeper… The family's hypnotic pull. The Family Therapy Networker, 9(2), 20–28, 69–71.
69.
SternC.R. (1985). There's no theory like no-theory: The Ericksonian approach in perspective. In ZeigJ.K. (Ed.), Ericksonian psychotherapy: Vol. I. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
70.
Van GorpW.G.MeyerR.G.DunbarK.D. (1985). The efficacy of direct versus indirect hypnotic induction techniques on reduction of experimental pain. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 33, 319–328.
71.
Von GlasersfeldE. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In WatzlawickP. (Ed.), The invented reality. New York: Norton.
72.
ZeigJ.K. (1985). The clinical use of amnesia: Ericksonian methods. In ZeigJ.K. (Ed.), Ericksonian Psychotherapy. Vol. I. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
73.
ZeitlinH. (1985). Cult induction: Hypnotic communication patterns in contemporary cults. In ZeigJ.K. (Ed.), Ericksonian Psychotherapy. Vol. I. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
