Ondersoek is ingestel na die mate waarin dié deel van die variansie in ASAT-tellings wat deur groeplidmaatskap verklaar word alternatiewelik deur houdings-, motiverings- en omgewingsveranderlikes verklaar kan word. Omgewingsveranderlikes is geoperasionaliseer in 'n indeks van sosio-ekonomiese status (SES). Houdings- en motiveringsveranderlikes het net 'n klein deel van die variansie verklaar, maar 'n groot deel van die variansie kon deur SES verklaar word. Daar is afgelei dat verskille in ASAT-tellings wat tussen bevolkingsgroepe gevind word in 'n groot mate verklaar kan word in terme van omgewingsveranderlikes wat met bepaalde SES-vlakke geassosieer is.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiA. (1982). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
2.
AtkinsonJ.W. (1974). Motivational determinants of intellective performance and cumulative achievement. In AtkinsonJ.W.RaynorJ.O. (Eds), Motivation and achievement (pp. 389–410). Washington, DC: Winston.
3.
BerryJ.W. (1988). Cognitive values and cognitive competence among the bricoleurs. In BerryJ.W.IrvineS.H.HuntE.B. (Eds), Indigenous cognition: Functioning in cultural context (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
4.
BerryJ.W.TrimbleJ.E.OlmedoE.L. (1986). Assessment of acculturation. In LonnerW.J.BerryJ.W. (Eds), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 291–325). London: Sage.
5.
BouchardT.J.SegalN.L. (1985). Environment and IQ. In WolmanB.B. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 391–464). New York: Wiley.
6.
ClaassenN.C.W. (1987). Handleiding vir die Algemene Skolastiese Aanlegtoets (ASAT) Intermediěre Reeks. Pretoria: Raad vir Geesteswetenskaplike Navorsing.
De LaceyP.R. (1970). An index of contact. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 5, 219–223.
9.
Du ToitL.B.H. (1974). Handleiding vir die opname van studiegewoontes en -houdings. Pretoria: Raad vir Geesteswetenskaplike Navorsing.
10.
Du ToitL.B.H. (1983). Handleiding vir die prentemotiveringstoetse. Pretoria: Raad vir Geesteswetenskaplike Navorsing.
11.
FergusonG. (1956). On transfer and the abilities of man. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 10, 121–131.
12.
GoodenoughF. (1936). The measurement of mental functions in primitive groups. American Anthroplogist, 38, 1–11.
13.
HerrickV.E. (1951). What is already known about the relation of the I.Q. to cultural background? In EelsK.DavisA.HavinghurstR.J.HerrickV.E.TylerR.W. (Eds), Intelligence and cultural differences (pp. 10–15). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
HermsteinR.J. (1973). I.Q. in the meritocracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
15.
HolzmannW.H.BrownW.F. (1953). Study habits and attitudes in the prediction of academic success. American Psychologist, 8, 369–378.
16.
India's castes: Old fissures in an old landscape. Economist, (1986) September 6, 24–32.
17.
InkelesA.SmithD.H. (1974). Becoming modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
JensenA.R. (1974). How biased are culture-loaded tests?Genetic Psychology Monographs, 20, 185–244.
19.
JensenA.R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. London: Methuen.
20.
KagitcibasiC.BerryJ.W. (1989). Cross-cultural psychology: Current research and trends. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 493–531.
21.
OlmedoE.L.MartinezJ.L.MartinezS.R. (1978). Measure of acculturation for Chicago adolescents. Psychological Reports, 42, 159–170.
22.
PetriH.L. (1981). Motivation: Theory and research. Belmont: Wadsworth.
RaynorJ.O. (1974). Relationships between achievement-related motives, future orientation, and academic performance. In AtkinsonJ.W.RaynorJ.O. (Eds), Motivation and achievement (pp. 173–180). Washington, DC: Winston.
25.
RedfieldR.LintonR.HerskovitsM.J. (1936). Memorandum on the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149–152.
26.
RetiefA. (1988). Method and theory in cross-cultural psychological assessment. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
27.
SamudaR. (1983). Cross-cultural testing within a multicultural society. In IrvineS.H.BerryJ.W. (Eds), Human assessment and cultural factors, (pp. 591–606). New York: Plenum.
28.
ScarrS. (1981). Race, social class and individual differences in I.Q. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
SchepersJ.M. (1974). Critical issues which have to be resolved in the construction of tests for developing groups. Humanitas RSA, 2395–406.
30.
StemW. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Translated by WhippleG.M.. Baltimore: Warwick & York.
31.
SternbergR.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SternbergR.J. (1987). Synopsis of a triarchic theory of human intelligence. In IrvineS.H.NewsteadS.E. (Eds), Intelligence and Cognition: Contemporary Frames of Reference (pp. 141–176). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
33.
ThompsonJ.C. (1977). The measurement of modernization among South African Blacks: A pilot study. Johannesburg: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
34.
Van den BergA.R. (1985). Using the Junior South African Individual Scales (JSAIS) (1981) for testees from South African population groups which were not included in the norm population. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
35.
Van den BergA.R. (1989). Intelligensietoetse. In OwenK.TaljaardJ.J. (Red.) Handleiding vir die gebruik van sielkundige en skolastiese toetse van IPEN en NIPN (pp. 89–142). Pretoria: Raad vir Geesteswetenskaplike Navorsing.
36.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
WhiteK.R. (1982). The relation between socio-economic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.
