The validity of Mednick's Remote Associates Test (the RAT) is critically evaluated. First, Mednick's theoretical conceptualization of creativity and his explanation of the derivation of the RAT are briefly reviewed. Thereafter, the theoretical, predictive, convergent and discriminant validity of the RAT are critically examined in the light of both theory and empirical findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsF.M. (1975). Social and psychological factors which influence the creative process. In TaylorI.A.GetzelsJ.W. (Eds), Perspectives in creativity. (pp.117–145). Chicago: Aldine.
2.
BowerW.S.ClarkP.M. (1968). Relationships among selected measures of creativity. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
3.
CampbellD.FiskeD. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 81–105.
4.
ChusmirL.H.KobergC.S. (1986). Creativity differences among managers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 240–253.
5.
DattaL. (1964a). Remote Associates Test as a predictor of creativity in engineers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 183.
6.
DattaL. (1964b). A note on the Remote Associates Test, United States Culture, and Creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 184–185.
7.
EllisonB.A. (1973). Creativity in black artists: A comparison of selected creativity measures using judged creativity as a criterion. Journal of Non-White Concerns in Personnel and Guidance, 1, 150–157.
8.
ForbachG.B.EvansR.G. (1981). The Remote Associates Test as a predictor of productivity in brainstorming groups. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5(3), 333–339.
9.
GoodmanP.FurconJ.RoseJ. (1969). Examination of some measures of creative ability by the multimethod matrix. Journal of Applied Psychology, 5, 240–243.
10.
HamiltonM.A. (1982). ‘Jamaicanizing’ the Mednick Remote Associates Test of creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 321–322.
11.
HennesseyB.A.AmabileT.M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In SternbergR.J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity. (pp. 11–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
HocevarD. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assesment, 45(5), 450–464.
13.
IsenA.M.DaubmanK.A.NowickiG.P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131.
14.
JacksonP.W.MessickS. (1973). The person, the product and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. In BloombergM. (Ed.), Creativity: theory and research. Connecticut: College & University Press.
15.
KatzA.N. (1983). Relationship of Ammon's Quick Test of intelligence to verbal and non-verbal tests of creativity. Psychological Reports, 52, 747–750.
16.
KerlingerF.N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
17.
MansfieldR.S.BusseT.V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
18.
MednickS.A. (1962). The associative bases of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
NickersonR.S.PerkinsD.N.SmithE.E. (1985). The teaching of thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
NunnallyJ.C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
OchseR. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
RichardsonA.G. (1985). Personality correlates of creativity among a sample of Jamaican adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(6), 771–774.
24.
SimontonD.K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric enquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
SimontonD.K. (1989). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
TaftR.RossiterJ.R. (1966). The Remote Associates Test: Divergent or convergent thinking?. Psychological Reports, 19, 1313–1314.
27.
WakefieldJ.F. (1986). Creativity and the TAT blank card. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20(2), 127–133.
28.
WallachM.A. (1983). What do tests tell us about talents?. In AlbertR.S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence. (pp. 99–113). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
29.
WardW.C. (1975). Convergent and divergent measurement of creativity in children. Educational Psychology Measurement, 35, 87–95.
30.
WorthenB.R.ClarkP.M. (1971). Toward an improved measure of remote associational ability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8(2), 113–123.
