From a phenomenological point of view psychology as a human science is a descriptive science. Psychology as a descriptive science and psychology as an explanatory science are two distinct types of science and should not be viewed as two phases of science. The major arguments of Amedeo Giorgi's theoretical justification of descriptive science are presented. His arguments are the grounds on which two leading questions are explicated: What is description and what is the role of description in qualitative research? In reflecting on the context of gathering, creating and analysing descriptions, a distinction between description1 (concrete life-world descriptions) and description2 (psychological description of a phenomenon) is made. Descriptions are placed in the context of the researcher's interest; the researcher's request for a description by a subject; the subject as a narrator; the meaning of a description as a text; the researcher as a reader of descriptions and the researcher as author of description2. The conclusion consists of what might be ‘good’ descriptions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChurchillS.D. (1984). Forming clinical impressions: A phenomenological study of psychodiagnostic seeing. In AanstoosC.M. (Ed.), Exploring the lived world: Readings in phenomenological psychology. West Georgia College studies in the social sciences, vol. 23, pp. 67–84.
2.
ColaizziP.F. (1979). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In ValleR.S.KingM. (Eds), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
FeyerabendP. (1978). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: Verso/New left books.
4.
GeertzC. (1979). From the native's point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In RabinowP.SullivanW.M. (Eds), Interpretive social science: A reader. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
GenetteG. (1980). Narrative discourse (translated from the French by LewinJ.E.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published in 1972).
6.
GiorgiA. (1986a). The ‘context of discovery/context of verification’ distinction and descriptive human science. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 17, 151–166.
7.
GiorgiA. (1986b). Theoretical justification for the use of description in psychological research. In AshworthP.GiorgiA.de KoningA.J.J. (Eds), Qualitative research in psychology (pp. 3–22). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
8.
GülichE.QuasthoffU.M. (1986). Story-telling in conversation. Cognitive and interactive aspects. Poetics, 15, (1/2), 217–241.
HeideggerM. (1959). An introduction to metaphysics (Translated from the German by ManheimR.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
11.
HeideggerM. (1971). On the way to language. Translated from the German by HertzD.StambaughJ.). New York: Harper & Row.
12.
IngardenR. (1973a). The literary work of art. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
13.
IngardenR. (1973b). The cognition of the literary work of art. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
14.
KrugerD. (1988). The problem of interpretation in psychotherapy. HSRC Investigation into Research Methodology. Research report series: 7. Pretoria: HSRC.
15.
LabovW.WaletzkyJ. (1967). Narrative analysis. In Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
16.
McHoulA.W. (1982). Telling how texts talk: Essays on reading and ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17.
NisbettR.E.BellowsN. (1977). Verbal reports about causal influences on social judgments: Private access versus public theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, (9), 613–624.
18.
NisbettR.E.WilsonT.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
19.
OrthE.W. (1987). Phenomenology: description or interpretation. Concluding considerations. Phenomenology: Descriptive or Hermeneutic. The first annual symposium of the Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University
20.
PalmerR.E. (1973). Phenomenology as foundation for a post-modern philosophy of literary interpretation. Cultural Hermeneutics, 1, 207–223.
21.
RicoeurP. (1979). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text. In RabinowP.SullivanW.M. (Eds). Interpretive social science: A reader. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
RomanyshynR.D. (1982). Psychological life: From science to metaphor. Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.
23.
RyanR. (1985). Pathologies of epistemology in literary studies. Journal of Literary Studies, 1, (1), 3–42.
24.
ShotterJ. (1984). Social accountability and selfhood. Oxford: Basil Blackwood.
25.
SilvermanH.J. (1987). Phenomenology: From hermeneutics to deconstruction. Phenomenology: Descriptive or hermeneutic. The first annual symposium of the Simon Silverman Phenomenology Center. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University.
26.
SilversR.J. (1982) (a) Discourse in a search for a communicative relationship. (b) A silence within phenomenology. In DarrochV.SilversR.J. (Eds). Interpretive human studies: An introduction to phenomenological research. Washington: University Press of America.
27.
StrasserS. (1985). Understanding and explanation: Basic ideas concerning the humanity of the human sciences. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
28.
StempelW.D. (1986). Everyday narrative as a prototype. Poetics, 15, (1/2), 203–216.
29.
StrunkO. (1982). Privacy: Experience, understanding, expression. Washington: University Press of America.
30.
TannenD. (1984). The oral/literate continuum in discourse. In TannenD. (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
31.
WertzF.J. (1984). Procedures in phenomenological research and the question of validity. In AanstoosC.M. (Ed.), Exploring the lived world: Readings in phenomenological psychology. West Georgia College studies in the social sciences, vol. 13, pp. 29–48.
32.
WodakR. (1986). Tales from the Vienna woods. Sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic considerations of narrative analysis. Poetics, 15, (1/2), 153–182.
33.
WeinzweigM. (1977). Phenomenology and ordinary language philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 8, 116–146.
