The Draw-a-Man Test: A 50-Year Perspective on Drawings Done by Black South African Children

Abstract

Dutch

Human figure drawings done by 415 urban black children were compared with the figures of people drawn by children in 1938 and 1950. Though children from five to eight years of age showed no change in performance over the 50-year time-span, there was a significant improvement in the Goodenough scores obtained by contemporary children of school age in comparison with the historical samples. Whilst it is feasible that betterment of the wider social milieu of black people in South Africa may be associated with these changes, no significant relationships between Draw-a-Man scores and socio-economic status could be demonstrated for the older children in the 1988 sample. For this group, test performance showed some relationship with scholastic achievement. The Draw-a-Man test appears to have some validity as a general cognitive measure amongst local black children between the ages of five and eight years. The test seems to be unsuitable for children over eight years of age because, from this age onwards, it underestimates abilities to a marked extent.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasi

(1968). Psychological Testing (3rd ed.). Toronto: Macmillan.

Bakare

C.G.

(1972). Social class differences in the performance of Nigerian children on the Draw-a-Man Test. In Cronbach

L.J.

Drenth

P.J.

(Eds), Mental tests and cultural adaptation. The Hague: Mouton.

Diamond

C.R.

(1979). Economic perspective on organized labour and socio-economic development. In Hare

Wiendieck

von Broembsen

(Eds), South Africa: Sociological analyses. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Goodenough

F.L.

(1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. Chicago: World Book Co.

Harris

D.B.

(1963). Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity: A revision and extension of the Goodenough Draw-a-Man Test. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Herman

A.A.

(1984). Trends in perinatal and infant mortality in South Africa. Paper No. 171. Cape Town: Second Carnegie Enquiry into Poverty and Development in Southern Africa.

Hunkin

(1950). Validation of the Goodenough Draw-a-Man Test for African children. Journal for Social Research, 1, 52–63.

Kellmer-Pringle

M.L.

Pickup

K.T.

(1963). The reliability and validity of the Goodenough Draw-a-Man test. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 297–306.

Mayekiso

T.V.

(1983). A psychological evaluation of the human figure drawings of a sample of black Standard V school children. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Fort Hare.

10.

Oates

L.E.

(1938). The Goodenough Drawing Test and its application to Zulu children. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of South Africa.

11.

Pfeffer

Olowu

(1986). Effects of socioeconomic differences on the sophistication of Nigerian children's human figure drawings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 771–774.

12.

Reisman

J.M.

Yamokoski

(1973). Can intelligence be estimated from drawings of a man? Journal of School Psychology, 11, 239–244.

13.

Reynolds

P.F.

(1984). Children of Crossroads — An ethnographic study of cognition among seven year-old Xhosa children in an urban environment. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Cape Town.

14.

Richter

L.M.

Windell

P.M.

Griesel

R.D.

(1985). The relationship between Draw-a-Man scores and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities in a sample of peri-urban African children. Paper presented at the Third National Psychology Conference, Pretoria.

15.

Sloan

1955. The Lincoln Oseretsky Motor Development Scale. Chicago:Stoelting.

16.

Ucman

(1972). A normative study of the Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test on a Turkish sample. In Cronbach

L.J.

Drenth

P.J.

(Eds), Mental tests and cultural adaptation. The Hague: Mouton.