Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-12
Participation in (non)violent protests and associated psychosocial factors: sociodemographic status,civic engagement,and perceptions of government’s performance
A national representative sample of adults is used to assess whether socioeconomic circumstances, civic engagement, and perceptions about government performance are associated with participation in (non)violent protests. Blacks and those who report high levels of poverty and civic engagement are likely to participate in non-violent protests. Individuals who have not completed schooling, are members of an organisation, view government as highly corrupt, and rate government’s service delivery very unfavourably are more likely to participate in violent protests than non-violent protests. The varying paths to protests including the psychosocial factors and motivational dynamics underlying individual’s participation in protests are discussed.
AlexanderP. (2010). Rebellion of the poor: South Africa’s service delivery protests–a preliminary analysis. Review of African Political Economy, 37(123), 25–40.
2.
AlexanderP.RuncimanC.NgwaneT.MolotoB.MokgeleK.Van StadenN. (2018). Frequency and turmoil: South Africa’s community protests 2005–2017. South African Crime Quarterly, 63, 27–42.
3.
BedassoB. E.ObikiliN. (2016). A dream deferred: The microfoundations of direct political action in pre- and post-democratisation South Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1036041
4.
Bohler-MullerN.RobertsB. J.StruwigJ.GordonS. L.RadebeT.AlexanderP. (2017). Minding the Protest: Attitudes towards different forms of protest action in contemporary South Africa. South African Crime Quarterly, 62, 81–92.
5.
BrattonM. (2006). Poor people and democratic citizenship in Africa (Afrobarometer Working Paper No. 56). Afrobarometer.
6.
CanhamH. (2018). Theorising community rage for decolonial action. South African Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 319–330.
7.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.
8.
DayS.SeedatM.CornellJ.SufflaS. (2019). A multimodal reading of public protests. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(6), 1005–1023.
9.
De JuanA.WegnerE. (2019). Social inequality, state-centered grievances, and protest: Evidence from South Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(1), 31–58.
10.
DiGraziaJ. (2014). Individual protest participation in the United States: Conventional and unconventional activism. Social Science Quarterly, 95(1), 111–131.
11.
DuncanJ. (2016). Protest nation: The right to protest in South Africa. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
12.
FieldA. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th revised ed.). SAGE.
13.
FosterM. D.MathesonK. (1999). Perceiving and responding to the personal/group discrimination discrepancy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1319–1329.
14.
GordonS.StruwigJ.RobertsB.MchunuN.MtyingizaneS.RadebeT. (2018). What drives citizen participation in political gatherings in modern South Africa? A quantitative analysis of self-reported behaviour. Social Indicators Research, 141, 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1851-1
15.
KlandermansB.OegemaD. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519–531.
16.
KlandermansB.Van der ToornJ.Van StekelenburgJ. (2008). Embeddedness and identity: How immigrants turn grievances into action. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 992–1012.
17.
LangaM.KiguwaP. (2013). Violent masculinities and service delivery protests in post-apartheid South Africa: A case study of two communities in Mpumalanga. Agenda, 27(1), 20–31.
18.
LaveryJ. (2012). Protest and political participation in South Africa: Time trends and characteristics of protesters (Briefing Paper No. 102). Afrobarometer.
19.
MarienS.HoogheM.QuintelierE. (2010). Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: A multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies, 58(1), 187–213.
20.
MoseleyM. W. (2015). Contentious engagement: Understanding protest participation in Latin American democracies. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 7(3), 3–48.
21.
MottairS.BondP. (2012). The politics of discontent and social protest in Durban. Politikon, 39(3), 309–330.
22.
NetsweraF. G. (2014). The underlying factors behind violent municipal service delivery protests in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 49(1), 261–273.
23.
NetsweraF. G.KgalaneS. (2014). The underlying factors behind violent municipal service delivery protests in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 49(1), 261–273.
24.
ParetM.RuncimanC.SinwellL. (Eds.). (2017). Southern resistance in critical perspective. Routledge.
25.
PithouseR. (2007). The university of Abahlali baseMjondolo. Voices of Resistance from Occupied London, 2, 17–20.
26.
PithouseR. (2011). The service delivery myth. Development in Focus, 1, 5–6.
QuarantaM. (2017). Protest and contentious action. In ThomsponW. R. (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics (pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press.
29.
RuncimanC. (2017). The ‘ballot and the brick’: Protest, voting and non-voting in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 34, 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2017.1287347
SimitiM. (2015). Rage and protest: The case of the Greek Indiginant Movement. Contention, 3(2), 33–50.
32.
StockemerD. (2014). What drives unconventional political participation? A two-level study. The Social Science Journal, 51, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2013.10.012
33.
Van StekelenburgJ.KlandermansB. (2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology Review, 61(5–6), 886–905.
34.
Van StekelenburgJ.KlandermansB. (2017). Individuals in movements: A social psychology of contention. In RoggebandC.KlandermansB. (Eds.), Handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 103–139). Springer.
35.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535.
36.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
37.
Von HoldtK.LangaM.MolapoS.MogapiN.NgubeniK.DlaminiJ.KirstenA. (2011). The smoke that calls: Insurgent citizenship, collective violence and the struggle for a place in the new South Africa. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Society, Work and Development Institute, University of the Witwatersrand.
