Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-6
Response to Shuttleworth-Edwards (2017),Country-wide norms declared obsolete: best practice alert for intelligence quotient testing in a multicultural context
BlakeT. M.FichtenbergN. L.AbeareC. A. (2009). Clinical utility of demographically corrected WAIS-III subtest scores after traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 373–384. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13854040802279691
O’ConnellM. E.TuokkoH.KadlecH. (2011). Demographic corrections appear to compromise classification accuracy for severely skewed cognitive tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 422–431. doi:10.1080/13803395.2010.532114
4.
PienaarI.Shuttleworth-EdwardsA. B.KlopperC. C.RadloffS. (2017). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth edition preliminary normative guidelines for educationally disadvantaged Xhosa-speaking individuals. South African Journal of Psychology, 47, 159–170. doi:10.1177/0081246316654805
5.
Shuttleworth-EdwardsA. B. (2012). Guidelines for the use of the WAIS-IV with WAIS-III cross-cultural normative indications. South African Journal of Psychology, 42(3), 399–410. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/008124631204200312
6.
Shuttleworth-EdwardsA. B. (2016). Generally representative is representative of none: Commentary on the Pitfalls of IQ test standardization in multicultural settings. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 975–998. doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1204011
7.
Shuttleworth-EdwardsA. B. (2017). Countrywide norms declared obsolete: Best practice alert for IQ testing in a multicultural context. South African Journal of Psychology, 47, 3–6. doi:10.1177/0081246316684465
8.
StrongC. A. H.DondersJ.Van DykeS. (2005). Validity of demographically corrected norms for the WAIS–III. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 746–758. doi:10.1081/13803390490919155
SunderaramanP.ZahodneL. B.ManlyJ. J. (2016). A commentary on ‘generally representative is representative of none: Pitfalls of IQ test standardization in multicultural settings’ by A.B. Shuttleworth-Edwards. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 999–1005. doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1211321
11.
TaylorN. (2016). Generally representative is generally representative: Comment on Shuttleworth-Edwards. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 1017–1022. doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1213884
12.
Te NijenhuisJ.MurphyR.Van EedenR. (2011). The Flynn effect in South Africa. Intelligence, 39, 456–467. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.08.003
13.
WechslerD. (2014). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Fourth South African edition (WAIS-IVSA). Johannesburg, South Africa: JvR Psychometrics (Pty) Ltd.
14.
WichertsJ. M.DolanC. V.CarlsonJ. S.van der MaasH. L. J. (2010). Raven’s test performance of sub-Saharan Africans: Average performance, psychometric properties, and the Flynn effect. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 135–151. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.001