Self-leadership has been recognised as a fundamental competency for effective learning and job performance. The primary goal of this study was to validate the Abbreviated Self-leadership Questionnaire on a South African sample. Numerous questionnaires have been developed to measure self-leadership, with the Revised Self-leadership Questionnaire being the most widely used questionnaire. However, the Revised Self-leadership Questionnaire has been deemed too long; hence, the authors abbreviated the measure. Therefore, there is a need to assess the reliability and construct validity of the abbreviated Self-leadership Questionnaire on a South African sample. A non-probability sample consisting of 400 students drawn from a university in the Western Cape was used. The reliability of the Abbreviated Self-leadership Questionnaire was evaluated using SPSS, while construct validity was assessed via confirmatory factory analyses in the LISREL program. Moderate levels of reliability were found for the subscales of the Abbreviated Self-leadership Questionnaire. Reasonable model fit with the data was found for the first-order measurement model. The study contributes to the requirements of the Amended Employment Equity Act of South Africa (Republic of South Africa, 1998) which promotes the use of reliable and valid instruments in South Africa by confirming the psychometric properties of the Abbreviated Self-leadership Questionnaire.
AlvesJ. C.LovelaceK. L.ManzC. C.MatsypuraD.ToyasakiF.KeK. G. (2006). Cross-cultural perspective of self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 338–359.
2.
AndersonJ. S.PrussiaG. E. (1997). The self-leadership questionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4, 119–143.
3.
AndressenP.KonradtU. (2007). Measuring self-leadership: Psychometric test of the German version of the revised self-leadership questionnaire. Zeitschrift fur Personalpsychologie, 6, 117–128.
4.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
BarlingJ.BeattieR. (1983). Self-efficacy beliefs and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5, 4–51.
7.
BlighM. C.PearceC. L.KohlesJ. C. (2006). The importance of self- and shared leadership in team based knowledge work. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 296–318.
8.
BurgerR. (2012). Elaboration and empirical evaluation of the De Goede learning potential structural model (Unpublished master’s thesis). Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
9.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behaviour. New York: Springer.
10.
CautelaJ. R. (1969). Behaviour therapy and self-control: Techniques and applications. In FranksC. M. (Ed.), Behavior therapy: Appraisal and status (pp. 323–340). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
CoxJ. F. (1993). The effects of super-leadership training on leader behaviour, subordinate self-leadership behaviour, and subordinate citizenship (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
12.
CunningtonB. (1985). The process of educating and developing managers for the year 2000. Journal of Management Development, 4, 566–579.
13.
CurralL.Marques-QuinteiroP. (2009). Self-leadership and work role innovation: Testing a mediation model with goal orientation and work motivation. Revista de Psicologıa del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 25, 163–174.
14.
De GoedeJ.TheronC. C. (2010). An investigation into the internal structure of the learning potential construct as measured by the APIL-B test battery. Management Dynamics, 19, 30–55.
15.
DeciE.RyanR. (1985). The support of autonomy and control of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.
16.
DiamantopoulosA.SiguawJ. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London, UK: SAGE.
17.
DiLielloT. C.HoughtonJ. D. (2006). Maximizing organizational leadership capacity for the future: Toward a model of self-leadership, innovation and creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 319–337.
18.
DoganS.SahinF. (2008). A study of reliability, validity and adaptation of revised self-leadership questionnaire-RSLQ to Turkish context. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 26, 139–164.
19.
Du ToitM.Du ToitS. H. C. (2001). Interactive LISREL: User’s guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
20.
EsterhuyseW. (2008). Monduitspoel: Inploffing. Die Burger. Saturday 2August.
21.
FarrellA. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty and Shu. Business Research, 63, 324–327.
22.
GilF.RicoR.AlcoverC. M.BarrasaA. (2005). Change-oriented leadership, satisfaction and performance in work groups: Effects of team climate and group potency. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 312–328.
23.
HairJ.AndersonR.BlackB.BabinB.BlackW. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
HoJ.NesbitP. L. (2009). A refinement and extension of the self-leadership scale for the Chinese context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 450–476.
25.
HoughtonJ. D.DawleyD.DiLielloT. C. (2012). The abbreviated self-leadership questionnaire (ASLQ): A more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7, 216–232.
26.
HoughtonJ. D.NeckC. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 672–691.
27.
IBM Corporation (2015). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 23.0. Armonk, NY: Author.
KanferF. H. (1970). Self-regulation: Research, issues, and speculation. In NeuringerC.MichaelJ. L. (Eds.), Behaviour modification in clinical psychology (pp. 178–220). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31.
KellowayE. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modelling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
MahembeB. (2014). The development and empirical evaluation of an extended learning potential structural model (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
33.
MahembeB.EngelbrechtA. S.De KockF. S. (2013). A confirmatory factor analytic study of a self-leadership measure in South Africa. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 1–10.
34.
ManzC. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 585–600.
35.
ManzC. C. (1991). Leading employees to be self-managing and beyond: Toward the establishment of self-leadership in organisations, Journal of Management Systems, 3, 15–24.
36.
ManzC. C. (1993a). The art of positive psyching: Skills for establishing constructive thinking patterns. King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design and Development.
37.
ManzC. C. (1993b). Becoming a self-manager: Skills for addressing difficult, unattractive, but necessary tasks. King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design and Development.
38.
ManzC. C. (1993c). Redesigning the way you do your job: Skills for building natural motivation into your work. King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design and Development.
39.
ManzC. C.NeckC. P. (2004). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40.
MarkhamS. E.MarkhamI. S. (1998). Self-management and self-leadership re-examined: A levels of analysis perspective. In DansereauF.YammarinoF. J. (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches, classical and new wave (pp. 193–210). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
41.
NeckC. P.HoughtonJ. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 270–295.
42.
NeckC. P.ManzC. C. (1996). Thought self-leadership: The impact of mental strategies training on employee behaviour, cognition, and emotion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 445–467.
43.
NeckC. P.ManzC. C. (2010). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44.
NeckC. P.StewartG.ManzC. C. (1995). Thought self-leadership as a framework for enhancing the performance of performance appraisers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31, 278–302.
45.
NelP.Van ZylE. (2015). Assessing the psychometric properties of the revised and abbreviated self-leadership questionnaires. SA Journal of Human Resource Management/SA Tydskrif vir Menslikehulpbronbestuur, 13, 1–8.
46.
NeubertM. J.WuJ. C. (2006). A cross-cultural validation of the Houghton and Neck self-leadership measure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 360–373.
47.
NorrisS. E. (2008). An examination of self-leadership. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 1, 43–61.
48.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
PreacherK. J.CoffmanD. L. (2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org/
50.
Republic of South Africa. (1998, October19). Employment Equity Act. Government Gazette, No. 19370.
51.
Republic of South Africa. (2014). Amended Employment Equity Act. Government Gazette, No. 19370.
52.
RossS. (2014). A conceptual model for understanding the process of self-leadership development and action-steps to promote personal leadership development. Journal of Management Development, 33, 299–323.
53.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
54.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
55.
StajkovicA. D.LuthansF. (1998). Self-efficacy and work related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261.
56.
StewartG. L.CourtrightS. H.ManzC. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37, 185–222.
57.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
58.
ThoresenC. E.MahoneyM. J. (1974). Behavioral self-control. New York: Holt McDougal.
59.
TichyN.ShermanS. (1993). Control your destiny or someone else will. New York: Wiley.
60.
Van HeerdenS.TheronC. (2014). The elaboration and empirical evaluation of the De Goede learning potential structural model. South African Journal of Business Management, 45, 1–30.
61.
Van ZylE. (2008). The relation between stress and self-leadership characteristics among a group of first-line supervisors working in a state organisation. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, 48, 454–466.
