HaiderA. (2006). Roper v. Simmons: The role of the science brief. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 3, 369–377.
3.
JohnsonS. B.BlumR.W.GieddJ. N. (2009). Adolescent Maturity and the Brain: The Promise and Pitfalls of Neuroscience Research in Adolescent Health Policy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 216–221.
4.
MaherG. (2005). Age and criminal responsibility. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2, 493–512.
5.
PillayA. L.WillowsC. (in press). Assessing the criminal capacity of children: A challenge to the capacity of mental health professionals. Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health.
Republic of South Africa. (2008). Child Justice Act No. 75 of 2008. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Gazette.
8.
Republic of South Africa. (2010, April1). Determination of persons or category or class of persons competent to conduct the evaluation of criminal capacity of a child and the allowances and remuneration (Government Gazette No. 33092). Pretoria, South Africa: Government Gazette.
9.
The Royal Society. (2011). Brain Waves Module 4: Neuroscience and the law. London, England: Author.
Taber-ThomasB. C.AspE. W.KoenigsM.SuttererM.AndersonS. W.TranelD. (2014). Arrested development: Early prefrontal lesions impair the maturation of moral judgement. Brain, 137, 1254–1261.
12.
United Nations. (2008). Report of the Committee on the Rights of the Child. New York, NY: Author.
13.
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2006). South Asia and the minimum age of criminal responsibility: Raising the standard of protection for children’s rights. Kathmandu, Nepal: UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia.
14.
UrbasG. (2000). The age of criminal responsibility: Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Australian Institute of Criminology.
15.
WeijersI.NuytiensA.ChristiaensJ. (2009). Transfer of minors to the criminal courts in Europe: Belgium and the Netherlands. In Junger-TasJ.DünkelF. (Eds.), Reforming juvenile justice (pp. 105–124). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.