This study examines the relationship between work–family interface and job performance. Furthermore, it focuses on the moderating role of conscientiousness, agreeableness, and the relationship between work–family interface (inter-role conflict and inter-role integration) and job performance. A purposive sample of 345 residents of Karachi consisting of 173 males and 172 females, belonging to double income families and employed in various factories, participated in the study. Data were collected using the Work–Family Interface Scale, the Job Performance Scale, and two personality dimensions of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (Conscientiousness and Agreeableness). Multiple regression analysis results indicated that the inter-role conflict dimension of work–family interface and agreeableness dimension of personality were significantly negatively associated with job performance. Conscientiousness and agreeableness significantly moderated inter-role integration and job performance, whereas no evidence was found of them having a moderating role in inter-role conflict and job performance. This research contributes towards an understanding of the role of positive dispositional attributes moderating between both aspects of work–family interface and job performance.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: CA, SAGE.
2.
AllanT. D. (2013). The work-family role interface: A synthesis of research from industrial and organizational psychology. In WeinerI. B. (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (2nd ed. pp. 698–718) . New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
AllanT. D.JohnsonR. R.SaboeK. N.ChoE.DumaniS.EvansS. (2012). Dispositional variables and work family conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 17–26. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.004
4.
AllenT. D.HerstD.BruckC.SuttonM. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278
5.
AryeeS. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work family conflict among married professional women: An evidence from Singapore. Human Relations, 45, 813–837.
6.
AycanZ. (2005). The interface between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1083–1120.
7.
BabinB. J.BolesJ. S. (1998). Employee’s behavior in a service environment: A model and test of potential differences between men and women. Journal of Marketing, 62, 77–91.
8.
BarnettR. C.HydeJ. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. The American Psychologist, 56, 781–796.
9.
BarrickR. M.MountK. M. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.1991.tb00688.xa
10.
BellaviaG.FroneM. (2005). Work-family conflict. In BarlingJ.KellowayE. K.FroneM. (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 113–147). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
BruckC. S.AllenT. D. (2003). The relationship between big five personality traits, negative affectivity, type A behavior and work family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 457–472. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00040-4
12.
CarlsonS. D.KacmarM. K.WayneH. J.GrazywaczG. J. (2006). Measuring the positive side of work family interface: Development and Validation of Work Family Enrichment Scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131–164. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002
13.
ChistiM. A.KamalA. (2002). NEO Personlaity Inventory- Revised (Urdu Version). National Institute of Psychology,Islamabad, Pakistan.
14.
ClarkC. S. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work family balance. Human Relations, 53, 747–770. doi:10.1177/0018726700536001
15.
CurbowB.McDonnellK.SprattK.GriffinJ.AgnewJ. (2003). Development of Work-Family Interface Scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 310–330. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(03)00042-5
16.
DavidJ. P.SulsJ. (1999). Coping efforts in daily life: Role of big five traits and problem appraisals. Journal of Personality, 67, 265–294.
17.
DubinskyA.MattsonB. (1979). Consequences of role conflict and ambiguity experiences by retail sales persons. Journal of Retailing, 55, 70–86.
18.
EbyL.CasperW.LockwoodA.BordeauxC.BrinleyA. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.28
19.
FriedeA.RyanA. M. (2005). The importance of the individual: How self-evaluations influence the work-family interface. In KossekE. E.LambertS. (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 185–200). : Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
20.
FroneM. R. (2003). Work family balance. In QuickJ. C.TetrickL. E. (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 143–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
FroneR. M.YardleyK. J.MarkelS. K. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of work family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 145–167.
22.
GrandeyA. A.CropanzanoR. (1999). The conservation of resource model applied to work family conflcitand strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 350–370. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1998.1666
23.
GreenhausJ. H.BeutellJ. N. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/258214
24.
GreenhausJ. H.PowellN. G. (2006). When work and families are allies: A theory of work family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.19379625
25.
HillE. J.YangC.HawkinsA. J.FerrisM. (2004). A cross-cultural test of the work-family interface in one corporation in 48 countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1300–1316.
26.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.
27.
HobfollS. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 337–421. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00062
28.
HobfollS. E.ShiromA. (2001). Conservation of resources theory. In GolembiewskiR. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 57–80). New York, NY: Dekker.
29.
JoseP. E. (2008). ModGraph-I: A programme to compute cell means for the graphical display of moderational analyses: The Internet version (Version 2.0). Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://pavlov.psyc.vuw.ac.nz/paul-jose/modgraph/
30.
KahnR. L.WolfeD. M.QuinnR. P.SnoekJ. D.RosenthalR. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York, NY: Wiley.
31.
KossekE. E.LambertS. J. (2005). Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
McCraeR. R.JohnP. O. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
33.
McElwainA.KorabikK.RosinH. M. (2005). An examination of gender differences in work-family conflict. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37, 269–284.
34.
NetemeyerR. G.Brashear-AlejandroT. B.BolesJ. S. (2004). A cross-national model of job-related outcomes of work role and family role variables: A retail sales context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 49–60. doi.10.1177/0092070303259128
35.
NetemeyerR. G.BolesJ. S.McMurrianR. (1996). Development and validation of Work-Family Conflict and Family-Work Conflict scales. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400–410.
36.
ParasuramanS.GreenhausJ. H. (2002). Toward reducing some critical gaps in work-family research. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 299–312.
37.
ParasuramanS.PurohitY. S.GodshalkV. M.BeutellN. J. (1996). Work and family variables, entrepreneurial career success, and psychological wellbeing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 275–300.
38.
PodsakoffM. P.OrganW. D. (1986). Self reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.
39.
ReioT. G.CallahanJ. L. (2004). Affect, curiosity, and socialization-related learning: A path analysis of antecedents to job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 3–22. doi:10.1023_B_JOBU.0000040269.72795.ce
40.
RiolliL.SavickiV. (2003). Optimism and coping as moderators of the relationship between work resources and burnout in information service workers. International Journal of Stress Management, 10, 235–252.
VollrathM. E.TorgersenS. (2008). Personality types and risky behaviors in Norwegian students. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 287–292. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00631.x.
44.
VoydanoffP. (2005). Towards a conceptualization of perceived work family fit and balance: A demand and resource approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 822–836.
45.
WayneJ. H.MusiscaN.FleesonW. (2004). Considering the role of personality in work family experience: Relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 108–130.
46.
WhiteheadL. D.KorabikK.LeroS. D. (2008). Work family integration: Introduction and overview. In KorabikK.LeroD. S.WhiteheadD. L. (Eds.), Hand book of work-family integration: Research, theory and best practices (pp. 1–7). Waltham, MA: Elsevier Inc.
47.
WittL. A.CarlsonD. (2006). The work-family interface and job performance: Moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 343–357.
48.
ZamanS. (2013). Work family interface and its relation with marital adjustment and job performance: The moderating role of personality and role salience (Unpublished PhD thesis). National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
49.
ZellarsK. L.PerreweP. L. (2001). Affective personality and content of emotional social support: Coping in organizations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 459–467. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.86.3.459
