Competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility examinations: are there solutions to the extensive waiting list?

Abstract

The mental health examinations (colloquially referred to as ‘30-day observations’) required to assist the courts in determining competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility are governed by sections 77, 78, and 79 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. Unfortunately, there is a significant backlog of these cases in South Africa, which puts pressure on mental health facilities and the courts. The article discusses some of the narrow approaches to these enquiries that may be contributing to the problem and raises possible alternatives that need to be examined in addressing the matter. Among these is the practice of hospitalization for examination periods up to 30 days, rather than day-visit examinations. Another barrier is the restriction of the examinations to psychiatrists, even though the legislation provides for the appointment of clinical psychologists to the enquiry panels.

Keywords

Dusky standard fitness to stand trial forensic mental health forensic psychology psychiatrist psychologist

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allan

(2005). The psychologist as expert witness. In Tredoux

Foster

Allan

Cohen

Wassenaar

(Eds.), Psychology and law (pp. 287–320). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.

Allan

Davis

(2010). Psychologists as expert witnesses in courts and tribunals. Retrieved from http://www.psychology.org.au/publications/inpsych/2010/august/allan/

Allan

Meintjes-Van der Walt

(2006). Expert evidence. In Kaliski

(Ed.), Psycholegal assessment in South Africa (pp. 342–356). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2011). Definition of intellectual disability. Retrieved from http://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition#.UqDDLdIW0aQ

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

Arboleda-Florez

(2002). On automatism. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 15, 569–576.

Bonnie

R. J.

(1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 291–316.

Damon

(2003). Murder suspect escapes from mental hospital. IOL News. Retrieved from http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/murder-suspect-escapes-from-mental-hospital-1.107568

Ebrahim

I. O.

(2006). Somnambulistic sexual behaviour (sexsomnia). Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 13, 219–224.

10.

Edens

J. F.

Smith

S. T.

Magyar

M. S.

Mullen

Pitta

Petrila

(2012). ‘Hired guns’, ‘charlatans’, and their ‘voodoo psychobabble’: Case law references to various forms of perceived bias among mental health expert witnesses. Psychological Services, 9, 259–271.

11.

Exworthy

Wilson

(2010). Escapes and absconding from secure psychiatric units. The Psychiatrist, 34, 81–82.

12.

Gowensmith

W. N.

Murrie

D. C.

Boccaccini

M. T.

(2012). Field reliability of competence to stand trial opinions: How often do evaluators agree, and what do judges decide when evaluators disagree? Law and Human Behavior, 36, 130–139.

13.

Janse van Rensburg

Allen

Alonso-Betancourt

Burns

Chabalala

Erlacher

… Zingela

(2012). The South African Society of Psychiatrists (SASOP) and SASOP State Employed Special Interest Group (SESIG) position statements on psychiatric care in the public sector. South African Journal of Psychiatry, 18, 133–147.

14.

Kaliski

S. Z.

(2006). The criminal defendant. In Kaliski

(Ed.), Psycholegal assessment in South Africa (pp. 93–112). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.

15.

Kolla

N. J.

Brodie

J. D.

(2012). Application of neuroimaging in relationship to competence to stand trial and insanity. In Simpson

J. R.

(Ed.), Neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry (pp. 145–162). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

16.

Large

Nielssen

Elliott

(2009). Reliability of psychiatric evidence in serious criminal matters: Fitness to stand trial and the defence of mental illness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 446–452.

17.

Levy

Bayne

(2004). Doing without deliberation: Automatism, automaticity, and moral accountability. International Review of Psychiatry, 16, 209–215.

18.

Mars

Ramlall

Kaliski

(2012). Forensic telepsychiatry: A possible solution for South Africa? African Journal of Psychiatry, 15, 244–247.

19.

McSherry

(1998). Getting away with murder? Dissociative states and criminal responsibility. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21, 163–176.

20.

Meyer

S. J.

Slabber

van Rensburg

P. H. J. J.

Nel

(2004). Use of the judicial section 9 certification in the free state. South African Journal of Psychiatry, 10, 104–108.

21.

Mkhize

Kometsi

(2008) Community access to mental health services: Lessons and recommendation. In Barren

(Ed.), South African Health Review (pp. 103–113). Durban, South Africa: Health Systems Trust.

22.

Mossman

(1999). ‘Hired Guns’, ‘Whores’, and ‘Prostitutes’: Case law references to clinicians of ill repute. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27, 414–425.

23.

Radebe

(2012). Statement by Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development: Justice, Crime Prevention and Security (JCPS) Cluster media briefing. Retrieved from http://www.gcis.gov.za/content/newsroom/media-releases/media-briefings/2012/June/25

24.

Republic of South Africa. (1998). Criminal Matters Amendment Act No. 68 of 1998 (Government Gazette, 7 October 1998). Pretoria, South Africa: Author.

25.

Republic of South Africa. (2008). Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. Pretoria, South Africa: Juta Law.

26.

Rocca

Carrossino

(2012). P-677 – Personality disorders and criminal responsibility in Italy: Forensic psychiatric considerations about the importance of going beyond a categorical view. European Psychiatry, 27(Suppl. 1), 1. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(12)74844-7

27.

Rogers

T. P.

Blackwood

N. J.

Farnham

Pickup

G. J.

Watts

M. J.

(2008). Fitness to plead and competence to stand trial: A systematic review of the constructs and their application. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 19, 576–596.

28.

Samuels

O’Driscoll

Allnutt

(2007). When killing isn’t murder: Psychiatric and psychological defences to murder when the insanity defence is not applicable. Australasian Psychiatry, 15, 474–479.

29.

Solomons

W. S.

(2004). The mentally retarded offender in a forensic setting – A South African study (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.

30.

Swanepoel

(2009). Law, psychiatry and psychology: A selection of constitutional, medico-legal and liability issues (Unpublished LLD thesis). University of South Africa, Pretoria.

31.

Weiss

E. A.

(2004, March 22–26). Forensic psychiatric services: Limpopo province. Paper presented at the First Regional Congress of Social Psychiatry in Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.

32.

Weiss

E. A.

(2013, April 24–25). Report on forensic psychiatric services 2012 Limpopo province. Paper presented at the Interdepartmental Forensic Mental Health Conference, Johannesburg, South Africa.

33.

Wells

Wilson

(2004). R v Leonboyer: The role of expert witnesses in psychological blow automatism cases. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11, 167–173.

34.

White

A. J.

Batchelor

Pulman

Howard

(2012). The role of cognitive assessment in determining fitness to stand trial. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 102–109. doi:10.1080/14999013.2012.688091

35.

World Health Organization. (2007). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th Rev.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.