Since the publication of the list of empirically supported treatments by the American Psychological Association in 1995 a controversy has resulted between those who view positive psychotherapeutic outcome as resulting from the use of specific (listed) techniques and those who lean towards the so-called common or relationship factors rather than particular techniques as necessary for such outcomes. This paper examines the controversy and shows that both sides follow the same objectivist/empiricist and reductionist epistemology. In contrast, the paper adopts a social constructionist perspective and shows that the idea of therapeutic outcome as linearly determined by either technical or common factors or a combination of these is a misleading oversimplification which fails to account for the dialogue which is the core of psychotherapy. Rather, positive outcome is viewed as mutually constructed in a unique dialogue which encompasses both common and technical factors. This takes the form of the conversational development of a new understanding or reframe of the problem followed by action which is deemed appropriate to the new understanding. This view is illustrated by practical examples.
AddisM. E.CarpenterK. M. (2000). The treatment rationale in cognitive behavioral therapy: Psychological mechanisms and clinical guidelines. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 7, 147–156
2.
AhnH.WampoldB. E. (2001). Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 251–257
3.
AndersonH.GoolishianH. A. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27, 371–393
4.
AndrewsH. B. (2000). The myth of the scientist-practitioner: A reply to R. King (1998) and N. King and Ollendick (1998). Australian Psychologist, 35, 60–63
5.
APA Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. (1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically validated psychological treatments. The Clinical Psychologist, 48, 3–23
6.
BeitmanB. D.ViamontesG. I.SothA. M.NiftierJ. (2006). Toward a neural circuitry of engagement, self-awareness, and pattern search. Psychiatric Annals, 36, 272–280
7.
BeutlerL. E.HarwoodT. M. (2002). What is and can be attributed to the therapeutic relationship?. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 32, 25–33
8.
BorkovecT. D.SibravaN. J. (2005). Problems with the use of placebo conditions in psychotherapy research, suggested alternatives, and some strategies for the pursuit of the placebo phenomenon. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 805–818
9.
Borrell-CarrióF.SuchmanA. L.EpsteinR. M. (2004). The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: Principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 576–582
10.
BuddR.HughesI. (2009). The Dodo Bird verdict — Controversial, inevitable and important: A commentary on 30 years of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 10, 648–660
11.
ButlerA. C.ChapmanJ. E.FormanE. M.BeckA. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17–31
12.
CastelnuovoG.FaccioE.MolinariE.NardoneG.SalviniA. (2004). A critical review of empirically supported treatments (ESTs) and common factors perspective in psychotherapy. Brief Strategic and Systemic Therapy European Review, 1, 208–224
13.
ChamblessD. L. (2002). Beware the Dodo Bird: The dangers of overgeneralization. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 13–16
14.
ChamblessD. L.HollonS. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18
15.
ChodoffP. (2002). The medicalization of the human condition. Psychiatric Services, 53, 627–628
16.
ChwaliszK. (2003). Evidence-based practice: A framework for twenty-first-century scientist-practitioner training. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 497–528
17.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
18.
CoyneJ. C.SegalL. (1982). A brief, strategic approach to psychotherapy. In AnchinJ. C.KieslerD. J. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychotherapy (pp. 248–261). New York: Pergamon Press
19.
CuijpersP.van StratenA.AnderssonG.van OppenP. (2008). Psychotherapy for depression in adults: A meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 909–922
20.
DeRubeisR. J.BrotmanM. A.GibbonsC. J. (2005). A conceptual and methodological analysis of the nonspecifics argument. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 174–183
21.
DumontF.FitzpatrickM. (2005). Fault lines in the great EST debate. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35, 67–81
22.
DuncanB. L.MillerS. D.SparksJ. A.ClaudD. A.ReynoldsL. R.BrownJ.JohnsonL. D. (2003). The session rating scale: Preliminary psychometric properties of a “working” alliance measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 3, 3–12
23.
DurrheimK. (1997). Social constructionism, discourse, and psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 27, 175–182
24.
ElkinsD. N. (2007). Empirically supported treatments: The deconstruction of a myth. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 47, 474–500
25.
ElkinsD. N. (2009). The medical model in psychotherapy. Its limitations and failures. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 49, 66–84
26.
ElvinsR.GreenJ. (2008). The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance: An empirical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1167–1187
27.
FourieD. P. (2000). First new meaning, then new action … Hypnotherapy as refraining. New Therapist, 10, 24–26
28.
FourieD. P. (2006). Treating phobias or treating people? Of acronyms and the social context. Health SA Gesondheid, 11, 41–48
29.
FourieD. P. (2008). Intransigent or “sticky” symptoms: Hypnotherapy and the deconstruction of ambivalence. South African Journal of Psychology, 38, 447–453
30.
FrankJ. D. (1971/2006). Therapeutic factors in psychotherapy. Focus. The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry, 4, 306–311
31.
FreedmanJ.CombsG. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities.New York: Norton
32.
FreireE. S. (2006). Randomized controlled clinical trial in psychotherapy research: An epistemological controversy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 46, 323–335
33.
GoldfriedM. R.WolfeB. E. (1998). Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 143–150
34.
GuthrieE. (2000). Enhancing the clinical relevance of psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Mental Health, 9, 261–271
35.
HerbertJ. D.GuidanoB. A. (2005). Moving from empirically supported treatment lists to practice guidelines in psychotherapy: The role of the placebo concept. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 893–908
36.
Honos-WebbL. (2005). The meaning vs. the medical model in the empirically supported treatment program: A consideration of the empirical evidence. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35, 55–65
37.
JørgensenC. R. (2004). Active ingredients in individual psychotherapy. Searching for common factors. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21, 516–540
38.
JoyceA. S.WolfaardtU.SribneyC.AylwinA. S. (2006). Psychotherapy research at the start of the 21st century: The persistence of the art versus science controversy. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 797–809
39.
KageeA. (2006). Where is the evidence in South African clinical psychology?. South African Journal of Psychology, 36, 233–248
40.
KingR. (1998). Evidence-based practice: Where is the evidence? The case of cognitive behaviour therapy and depression. Australian Psychologist, 33, 83–88
41.
KirschI.MooreT. J. (2002). The emperor's new drugs: An analysis of antidepressant medication data submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Prevention & Treatment, 5, 1–11
42.
LeykinY.DeRubeisR. J. (2009). Allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: Separating association from bias. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 16, 54–65
43.
LuborskyL.DiguerL.SeligmanD. A.RosenthalR.JohnsonS.HalperinG.BishopM.SchweizerE. (1999). The researcher's own therapeutic allegiances — A “wild card” in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 95–132
44.
LuborskyL.RosenthalR.DiguerL.AndrusynaT. P.BermanJ. S.LevittJ. T.SeligmanD. A.KrauseE. D. (2002). The Dodo bird verdict is alive and well — mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 2–12
45.
LuborskyL.SingerB.LuborskyL. (1975). Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that “Everyone has won and all must have prizes”?. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 995–1008
46.
MadridA. (2006). Helping children with asthma by repairing maternal-infant bonding problems. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 48, 199–211
47.
MastersW. H.JohnsonV. E. (1970). Human sexual inadequacy.Boston: Little Brown & Co.
48.
MesserS. B.WampoldB. E. (2002). Let's face facts: Common factors are more potent than specific therapy ingredients. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 21–25
49.
MillerS.WampoldB. E.VarhelyK. (2008). Direct comparisons of treatment modalities for youth disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 5–14
50.
MullenE. J.StreinerD. L. (2004). The evidence for and against evidence-based practice. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4, 111–121
51.
ParkerG.FletcherK. (2007). Treating depression with the evidence-based psychotherapies: A critique of the evidence. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 115, 352–359
52.
PersonsJ. B.SilberschatzG. (1998). Are results of randomized controlled trials useful to psychotherapists?. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 126–135
53.
RameyH. L.GrubbS. (2009). Modernism, postmodernism and (evidence-based) practice. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31, 75–86
54.
RaskinJ. D. (2002). Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism. In RaskinJ. D.BridgesS. K. (Eds.), Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology (pp. 1–25). New York: Pace University Press
55.
RosenzweigS. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6, 412–415
56.
ShedlerJ. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65, 98–109
57.
SlifeB. D.WigginsB. J.GrahamJ. T. (2005). Avoiding an EST monopoly: Toward a pluralism of philosophies and methods. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35, 83–97
58.
SmithK. R. (2009). Psychotherapy as applied science or moral praxis: The limitations of empirically supported treatment. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 29, 34–46
59.
SmithM.GlassG.MillerT. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
60.
SoldzS. (2006). Models and meanings: Therapist effects and the stories we tell. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 173–177
61.
SpielmansG. I.PasekL. F.McFallJ. P. (2007). What are the active ingredients in cognitive and behavioral psychotherapy for anxious and depressed children? A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 642–654
62.
StilesW. B. (2009). Responsiveness as an obstacle for psychotherapy outcome research: It's worse than you think. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 16, 86–91
63.
StilesW. B.BarkhamM.Mellor-ClarkJ.ConnellJ. (2008). Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural, person-centred, and psychodynamic therapies in UK primary-care routine practice: Replication in a larger sample. Psychological Medicine, 38, 677–688
64.
TrepkaC.ReesA.ShapiroD. A.HardyG. E.BarkhamM. (2004). Therapist competence and outcome of cognitive therapy for depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 143–157
65.
WaehlerC. A.KalodnerC. R.WampoldB. E.LichtenbergJ. W. (2000). Empirically supported treatments (ESTs) in perspective: Implications for counseling psychology training. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 657–671
66.
WampoldB. E.LichtenbergJ. W.WaehlerC. A. (2002). Principles of Empirically Supported Interventions in Counseling Psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 197–217
67.
WampoldB. E.MinamiT.BaskinT. W.TierneyS. C. (2002). A meta-(re)analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy versus ‘other therapies’ for depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 68, 159–165
68.
WampoldB. E.MondinG. W.MoodyM.StichF.BensonK.AhnH. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, “All Must Have Prizes.”. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203–215
69.
WatzlawickP.WeaklandJ.FischR. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution.New York: Norton
70.
WendtD. (2006). Evidence-based practice movements in psychology: Empirically supported treatments, common factors, and objective methodological pluralism. Intuition: BYU Undergraduate Journal of Psychology, 2, 49–62
71.
WestenD.NovotnyC. M.Thompson-BrennerH. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 631–663
72.
WongS. E. (2010). Single-case evaluation designs for practitioners. Journal of Social Service Research, 36, 248–259
73.
WoodyS. R.WeiszJ.McLeanC. (2005). Empirically supported treatments: 10 years later. The Clinical Psychologist, 58, 5–11
