Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2011-12
The Difference between Adolescent Users and Non-Users of Addictive Substances in a Low Socio-Economic Status Community: Contextual Factors Explored from the Perspective of Subjective Wellbeing
We aimed to explore the differences between adolescents from a low socio-economic Cape Town community who used addictive substances, and those who did not, with regard to subjective well-being. The Kidscreen52 was used to measure subjective wellbeing in a sample of 179 Grade 10 and 11 learners; 41.3% of the sample was male. Thirty-five percent of the adolescents reported to be substance users, with significantly more males reporting substance use than females in both grades. Scores on four of the sub-scales were significantly different for the substance users and non-users (namely, Feelings, General mood, Family and home life, School and learning). A post hoc analysis indicated that males and females differed significantly on General mood, but that this difference did not interact with substance use.
BoemmelJ.BriscoeJ. (9 May 2001). Web quest project theory fact sheet of Urie Bronfenbrenner.National Louis University. Available online: http://pt3.nl.edu/boemmelbriscoewebquest.pdf (Retrieved 11 July 2010).
2.
BronfenbrennerU. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development.USA: Sage Publications.
3.
BrookJ. S.MorojeleN. K.PahlK.BrookD. W. (2006). Predictors of drug use among South African adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 26–34.
4.
DishionT. J.CapaldiD. M.YoergerK. (1999). Middle childhood antecedents to progressions in male adolescent substance use: An ecological analysis of risk and protection. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 175–205.
5.
DishionT. J.KavanaghK.KiesnerJ. (1998). Prevention of early adolescent substance abuse among high-risk youth: A multiple gating approach to parent intervention. In AhseryR. S.RobertsonE. B.KumpherK. L., (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention through family intervention (NIDA Research Monograph 177, pp. 229–259). Rockville, Md: National Institute of Drug Abuse.
6.
FlisherA. J.ParryC. D. H.EvansJ.MullerM.LombardC. (2003). Substance use by adolescents in Cape Town: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32.
7.
GanaT. L. (2004). The influence of peers, community and religion on adolescent substance use in the Cape Metropolitan area.University of the Western Cape: Unpublished Master's dissertation.
8.
GreydanusD. E.PatelD. R. P. (2005). The adolescent and substance abuse: Current concepts. Current Problems in Pediatrics and Adolescent Health Care, 35, 78–98.
9.
International Test Commission (2002). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests. Available: http://www.intestcom.org/adapt_test.htm (accessed January 2008).
10.
KandelD. B.DaviesM. (1982). Epidemiology of Depressive Mood in Adolescents: An Empirical Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 39, 1205–1212.
11.
KandelD. B.LoganJ. A. (1984). Patterns of drug use from adolescence to young adulthood: Periods of risk for initiation, continued use, and discontinuation. American Journal of Public Health, 74, 660–666.
12.
MasekoJ.LadikosA.PrinslooJ.NeserJ.Van der MerweE.OvenM. (2003). Learners' general attitudes and views on experimenting with drugs. Acta Criminonlogica, 16, 136–150.
13.
ParryC. D. H.MorojeleN. K.SabanA.FlisherA. J. (2004). Brief report: Social and neighbourhood correlates of adolescent drunkenness: A pilot study in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 369–374.
14.
PlüddemannA.FlisherA. J.MathewsC.CarneyT.LombardC. (2008). Adolescent Methamphetamine use and sexual risk behaviour in secondary school students in Cape Town, South Africa. Drug & Alcohol Review, 27, 687–692.
15.
Ravens-SiebererU.GoschA.AbelT.AuquierP.BellachB.DürW., Rajmal, L., & the European KIDSCREEN Group. (2008). Quality of life in children and adolescents: An European public health perspective. Social and Preventive Medicine46, 297–302.
16.
RhodesJ. E.JasonL. A. (1990). A social stress model of substance abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 395–401.
17.
ReddyS. P.PandayS.SwartD.JinabhaiC. C.AmosunS. L.JamesS.MonyekiK. D.StevensG.MorojeleN. S.OmardienR. G.van de BorneH. W. (2002). Umthente Uhlaba Usamila: The South African national youth risk behavior survey.Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council.
18.
Swartz-FilliesS. (2007). Reflection on the life-world experiences of the adolescent “tik” user.University of the Western Cape: Unpublished Master's dissertation.
19.
TaliepN. (2010). Evaluating the construct validity of the Kidscreen52 quality of life questionnaire within a South African context utilizing exploratory factor analysis.University of the Western Cape: Unpublished Master's dissertation.
20.
VisserM.RoutledgeL. (2007). Substance abuse and psychological well-being of adolescents. South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 595–615.
21.
WardC.MertensJ. R.FlisherA. J.BresickG. F.SterlingS. A.LittleF.WeisnerC. N. (2008). Prevalence and correlates of substance use among South African primary care clinic patients. Substance Use and Misuse, 43, 1395–1410.
