This study examined relationships between the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices, the Similarities subtest of the South African Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales and an adaptation of the Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test Reading Comprehension subtest. Comparisons between these relationships were drawn on the basis of home language and gender in a sample of 100 university students. Results indicated significant relationships between the Advanced Matrices and both verbal tests, with no significant differences between the correlations on the basis of either gender or home language. This suggests that convergent validity is supported across these groups, and provides impetus for future research about the suitability of the Advanced Matrices for use within cross-cultural, multi-lingual contexts such as South Africa.
AbadF. J.ColomR.RebolloI.EscorialS. (2004). Sex differential item functioning in the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: Evidence for bias. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1459–1470.
ArthurW.JrWoehrD. J. (1993). A confirmatory factor analytic study examining the dimensionality of the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 471–478.
4.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CarrollJ. B. (1997). Psychometrics, intelligence and public perception. Intelligence, 24, 25–52.
6.
CarpenterP. A.JustM. A.ShellP. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven's Progressive Matrices test. Psychological Review, 97, 404–431.
7.
ColomR.EscorialS.RebolloI. (2004). Sex differences on the Progressive Matrices are influenced by sex differences on spatial ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1289–1293.
8.
ColomR.Garcia-LopezO. (2002). Sex differences in fluid intelligence among high school graduates. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 445–451.
9.
CourtJ. H. (1983). Sex difference in performance on Ravens Progressive Matrices: A review. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29, 54–74.
10.
CourtJ. H.KennedyR. J. (1976). Sex as a variable in Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices. Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Psychology, Paris, France.
11.
DeShonR. P.ChanD.WeissbeinD. A. (1995). Verbal overshadowing effects on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: Evidence for multidimensional performance determinants. Intelligence, 21, 135–155.
12.
DillonR. F.PohlmannJ. T.LohmanD. F. (1981). A factor analysis of Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices freed of difficulty factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1295–1302.
13.
FlynnJ. R. (1998). Israeli military IQ tests: Gender differences small; IQ gains large. Journal of Biosocial Science, 30, 541–553.
14.
FoxcroftC.RoodtG. (Eds.) (2001). An Introduction to Psychological Assessment in the South African Context.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
HeronA.ChownS. (1967). Age and function.London: Churchill.
16.
HydeJ. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using w2 and dAmerican Psychologist, 36, 892–901.
17.
HydeJ.FennemaE.LamonS. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–153.
18.
HydeJ.LinnM. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69.
19.
JensenA. R. (1998). The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability.Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
20.
KarlsenB.GardnerE. F. (1995). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (4th Ed.). New York: The Psychological Corporation.
21.
LezakM. D.HowiesonD. B.LoringD. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
LimT. K. (1994). Gender related differences in intelligence: Application of confirmatory factor analysis. Intelligence, 19, 179–192.
23.
LynnR. (1999). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox resolved. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 257–271.
24.
LynnR. (2002). Sex Differences on the Progressive Matrices among 15–16 Year Olds: Some data from South Africa. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 669–673.
25.
LynnR.AllikJ.IrwingP. (2004). Sex differences on three factors identified in Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices. Intelligence, 32, 411–424.
26.
LynnR.IrwingP. (2004). Sex differences on the Progressive Matrices: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 32, 481–498.
27.
MackintoshN. J. (1996). Sex differences and IQ. Journal of Biosocial Science, 28, 559–572.
28.
MackintoshN. J.BennettE. S. (2005). What do Raven's Matrices measure? An analysis in terms of sex differences. Intelligence, 33, 663–674.
29.
McGrewK. S.FlanaganD. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
30.
MurphyK. R.DavidshoferC. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (6th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.
31.
NeisserU.BoodooG.BouchardT. J.Jr.BoykinWade A.BrodyN.CeciS. J.HalpernD. F.LoehlinJ. C.PerloffR.SternbergR. J.UrbinaS. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.
32.
NellV. (1999). Standardising the WAIS-III and the WMS-III for South Africa: Legislative, Psychometric, and Policy Issues. South African Journal of Psychology, 29, 128–137.
33.
OlsonD. R. (1986). Intelligence and literacy: The relationship between intelligence and the technologies of representation and communication. In SternbergR. J.WagnerR. K. (Eds.), Practical intelligence: nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 338–360). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
OppenheimA. N. (1966). Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement.London: Heinemann.
35.
OwenK. (1992). The suitability of Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices for various groups in South Africa. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 149–159.
36.
OwenK. (1996). Test Bias and Test Fairness. In OwenK.TaljaardJ. J. (Eds.), Handbook for the Use of Psychological and Scholastic Tests of the HSRC (pp. 77–96). Pretoria, RSA: Human Sciences Research Council.
37.
PaulS. M. (1985). The Advanced Raven's Progressive Matrices: Normative data for an American university population and an examination of the relationship with Spearman's g. Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 95–100.
38.
RavenJ. C. (1938). Progressive Matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence, 1938, individual form.London: H. K. Lewis.
39.
RavenJ. (1989). The Raven Progressive Matrices: A review of the national norming studies and ethnic and socioeconomic variation within the United States. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 1–16.
40.
RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H.RavenJ. (1977). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales.London: H. K. Lewis.
41.
RavenJ.RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H. (1998). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales.Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
42.
RushtonJ. P.SkuyM.FridjhonP. (2003). Performance on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices by African, East Indian, and White engineering students in South Africa. Intelligence, 31, 123–137.
43.
SkuyM.SchutteE.FridjhonP.O'CarrollS. (2001). Suitability of Published Neuropsychological Test Norms for urban African secondary school students in South Africa. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 1413–1425.
44.
SpreenO.StraussE. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary (2nd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
StraussE.ShermanM. S.SpreenO. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary (3rd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
StraussL. (2003). Background variables related to the intelligence and academic performance of African, White and Indian engineering students. Unpublished Research Report submitted for the Degree of M.Ed. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
47.
ThissenD. M. (1976). Information in wrong responses to the Raven Progressive Matrices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 210–214.
