South Africa has one of the highest rates of intimate partner violence in the world. However, very little research has been done in South Africa on the interventions that combat this violence. We investigated an intervention for domestically violent men through the experiences of six female partners during programme participation. Interpretative phenomenology was used to analyse women's experiences of the intervention programme. During programme participation men continued to dominate female partners by keeping information about domestic violence secret and accusing the woman of being the abuser. Women continued to experience psychological abuse and were ambivalent about the long-term effectiveness of the programme. The study highlights the importance of hearing women's voices when assessing programme effectiveness, predicting future abuse, and increasing the long-term efficacy of intervention programmes.
AudiR. (Ed.) (1999). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BabcockJ. C.GreenC. E.RobieC. (2002). Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychological Review, 23, 1023–1053.
3.
BellM. E.CattaneoL. B.GoodmanL. A.DuttonM. A. (2008). Assessing the risk of future psychological abuse: Predicting the accuracy of battered women's predictions. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 69–80.
4.
BogradM. (1990). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: an introduction. In YllöK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11–26). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
BoonzaierF. (2005). Woman abuse in South Africa: A brief contextual analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 99–103.
6.
BoonzaierF. (2008). ‘If the man says you must sit, then you must sit’: The relational construction of woman abuse: Gender, subjectivity and violence. Feminism and Psychology, 18, 183–206.
7.
BoonzaierF.de la ReyC. (2004). Woman abuse: the construction of gender in women and men's narratives of violence. South African Journal of Psychology, 34, 443–463.
8.
BuchbinderE.EisikovitsZ. (2008). Doing treatment: Batterers' experience of intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 6, 616–630.
9.
ButtellF. P.CarneyM. M. (2004). A multidimensional assessment of a batterer treatment program: an alert to a problem?Research on Social Work, 14, 93–101.
10.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1998). Cross-border encounters: challenges and opportunities. In. DobashE. R.DobashR. P. (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 1–21). London, England: Sage.
11.
DobashR.DobashR. E.CavanaghK.LewisR. (1996). Re-education programmes for violent men — an evaluation. Research Findings, 46, 1–4.
12.
DuttonD. G.CorvoK. (2006). Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 11, 457–483.
13.
DuttonD. G.CorvoK. (2007). The Duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 12, 658–667.
14.
EsterbergK. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
15.
FederL.WilsonD. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers' behaviour?Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 239–262.
16.
FikreeF. F.RazzakJ. A.DurocherJ. (2005). Attitudes of Pakistani men to domestic violence: a study from Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of Men's Health and Gender, 2, 49–58.
17.
FollingstadD. R.EdmundsonM. (2010). Is psychological abuse reciprocal in intimate relationships? Data from a national sample of American adults. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 495–508.
18.
GeffherR. A.RosenbaumA. (2001). Domestic violence offenders: treatment and intervention standards. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5, 1–9.
19.
GoldmanJ.Du MontJ. (2001). Moving forward in batterer program evaluation: posing a qualitative, woman-centered approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 297–305.
20.
GrauwilerP. (2008). Voices of women: Perspectives on decision-making and the management of partner violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 3111–322.
21.
GregoryC.ErezE. (2002). The effects of batterer intervention programs: The battered women's perspectives. Violence against Women, 8, 206–232.
22.
GrigsbyN.HartmanB. R. (1997). The barriers model: An integrated strategy for intervention with battered women. Psychotherapy, 34, 485–497.
23.
HambergerL. K., (1997). Cognitive behaviour treatment of men who batter their partners. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice, 4, 147–169.
24.
HeiseL.Garcia-MorenoC. (2002). Violence by intimate partners. In KrugE. G.DahlbergL. L.MercyJ. A.ZwiA. B.LozanoR. (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 89–121). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.
25.
HydénM. (2005). ‘I must have been an idiot to let it go on’: Agency and positioning in battered women's narratives of leaving. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 169–188.
26.
JacksonS.FederL.FordeD. R.DavisR. C.MaxwellC. D.TaylorB. G. (2003). Batterer intervention programs: Where do we go from here?Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
27.
JacobsT.SulemanF. (1999). Breaking the silence: a profile of domestic violence in women attending a community health centre. Health Systems Trust. Retrieved October 5, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.hst.org.za/uploads/files/violence.pdf.
28.
JewkesR.LevinJ.Penn-KekanaL. (2002). Risk factors for domestic violence: Findings from a South African cross-sectional study. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 1603–1617.
29.
RosenbaumA.LeisringP. A. (2001). Group intervention programs for batterers. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 5, 57–71.
30.
RothmanE. F.ButchartA.Cerdá. (2003). Intervening with perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A global perspective. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.
31.
SartinR. M.HansenD. J.HussM. T. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 11, 425–440.
32.
SeedatM.Van NiekerkA.JewkesR.SufflaS.RateleK. (2009). Violence and injuries in South Africa: Prioritising an agenda for prevention. Lancet, 374, 1011–1022.
33.
SpinelliE. (2005). The interpreted world. London, England: SAGE Publications.
34.
StuartG. L.TempleJ. R.MooreT. M. (2007). Improving batterer intervention programs through theory-based research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 560–562.
35.
Van WormerK.BednarS. G. (2002). Working with male batterers: A restorative-strengths perspective. Families in Society, 83, 557–565.
36.
WalkerL. E. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
37.
WilligC. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Adventures in theory and method. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
