Postmodernism opens up a new way of thinking about how life is understood and how knowledge is structured, and as such, it demands that one must accept that there have been major shifts in psychoanalytic thinking since Freud's time. The relational psychoanalytic perspective understands and structures knowledge differently from traditional psychoanalysis, as described by Freud, and it is not possible to reconcile these two paradigms. Consequently, both present a method for working with patients that is in stark contrast to each other. The relational perspective views the analytical relationship as mutual but asymmetrical, bi-directional, co-created and involves the dynamic inter-play of multiple subjectivities and multiple self-representations. Within this approach, I argue that self-disclosure is a respected technique, inevitable and a co-construction. In addition, there are objections to its use, regardless of theoretical approach, and they are presented and addressed.
AntakiC.BarnesR.LeudarI. (2005). Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 181–199.
2.
AronL. (1996). A meeting of minds — mutuality in psychoanalysis.London: The Analytic Press.
3.
BarglowP. (2005). Self-disclosure in psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 59, 83–99.
4.
BenjaminL. (1998). Shadow of the other: Intersubjectivity and gender in psychoanalysis.New York: Routledge.
5.
BernsteinJ.W. (2001). Further entanglements of the intersubjective and interpersonal spheres. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 127–130.
6.
BotticelliS. (2004). The politics of relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 635–651.
7.
ButlerJ. (2005). Giving an account of oneself.New York: Fordam University Press.
8.
ChrzanowskiG. (1980). Collaborative inquiry, affirmation and neutrality in the psychoanalytic situation. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 16, 348–366.
9.
EhrenbergD. B. (1992). The intimate edge. Extending the reach of psychoanalytic interaction.New York: Norton.
10.
EhrenbergD. B. (1995). Self-disclosure: Therapeutic tool or indulgence?. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 31, 213–228.
11.
EhrenbergD. B. (2005). Afterward: The intimate edge. In AronL.HarrisA. (Eds), Relational psychoanalysis Vol 2: Innovation and expansion, (pp. 17–28). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
12.
FarberB.A. (2003). Self-disclosure in psychotherapy practice and supervision: An introduction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 525–528.
13.
FerencziS. (1932). The clinical diary of Sandor Ferenczi.DupontJ. (Ed.), (trans. M. Balint & N. Z Jackson). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (1988).
14.
FisherC.D. (2004). Ethical issues in therapy: Therapist self-disclosure of sexual feelings. Ethics and Behavior, 14, 105–121.
15.
FreudS. (1912). The dynamics of transference. Standard Edition, 12, 97–108. London: Hogarth, 1958.
16.
GedimanH.K. (2006). Facilitating analysis with implicit and explicit self-disclosures. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 16, 241–262.
17.
GellerJ. (2003). Self-disclosure in psychoanalytic-existential therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 541–554.
18.
GoldnerV. (2002). Relational theory and the postmodern turn. In FairfieldS.LaytonL.StackC. (Eds), Bringing the plague: Toward a postmodern psychoanalysis, (pp. 157–166). New York: Other Press.
19.
GoldsteinE.G. (1994). Self-disclosure in treatment: What therapists do and don't talk about. Clinical Social Work Journal, 22, 417–433.
20.
GreenbergJ. (1995). Self-disclosure: Is it psychoanalytic?. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 31, 193–205.
21.
HansonJ. (2005). Should your lips be zipped? How therapist self-disclosure and non-disclosure affects clients. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 5, 96–104.
HeimannP. (1950). On countertransference. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 31, 81–84.
24.
HeruA.M.StrongD.PriceM.RecuperoJ.D. (2006). Self-disclosure in psychotherapy supervisors: Gender differences. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 60, 323–334.
25.
HoffmanI. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 389–422.
26.
HoffmanI. Z. (1994). Dialectical thinking and therapeutic action in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 63, 187–218.
27.
JourardS. (1964/1971). The transparent self.New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
28.
JourardS. (1968). Disclosing man to himself.New York: D. Van Nostrand.
29.
KnightZ.G. (2007). The analyst's emotional surrender. Psychoanalytic Review, 94, 277–290.
30.
KuhnT. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago: University Press of Chicago.
31.
LevensonE. (1996). Aspects of self-revelation and self-disclosure. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32, 237–248.
32.
LittleM. (1951). Countertranference and the patient's response to it. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 33, 32–40.
33.
LittleM. (1957). ‘R’ — the analyst's total response to his patient's needs. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 38, 240–254.
34.
MarodaK.J. (1991). The power of countertransference.Chichester, New York: Wiley.
35.
MarodaK.J. (2003). Seduction, surrender, and transformation: Emotional engagement in the analytic process. Relational Perspectives Book Series, 13.NJ: The Analytic Press.
36.
MitchellS. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
MitchellS. A. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis.New York: Basic Books.
38.
MitchellS.A. (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis.Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
39.
MitchellS. A.AronL. (Eds). (1999). Relational psychoanalysis. The emergence of a tradition.Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
40.
OgdenT. H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. In MitchellS.A.AronL. (Eds). (1999). Relational psychoanalysis. The emergence of a tradition (pp. 459–486). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
41.
OrangeD.M.StolorowR.D. (1998). Self-disclosure from the perspective of intersubjectivity theory. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 18, 530–537.
42.
RachmanA. W. (1993). Ferenczi and sexuality. In AronL.HarrisA. (Eds), The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi.Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
43.
RachmanA.W. (1998). Judicious self-disclosure by the psychoanalysts. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 7, 263–269.
44.
ReichA. (1950). Further remarks on countertransference. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 32, 25–31.
45.
RenikO. (1995). The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanalysis Quarterly, 64, 466–495.
46.
RoazenP. (1975). Freud and his followers.New York: Knopf.
47.
RobertsJ. (2005). Transparency and self-disclosure in family therapy: Dangers and possibilities. Family Processes, 44, 45–63.
48.
SafranJ. D.MuranJ. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance.New York: The Guilford Press.
49.
StolorowR.D.AtwoodG.E. (1992). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life.Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
50.
TauberE. (1954). Exploring the therapeutic use of countertransference data. Psychiatry, 17, 331–336.
51.
WachtelP.L. (1993). Therapeutic communication: Principles and effective practice.New York: Guilford.
52.
WinnicottD.W. (1963). Psychiatric disorder in terms of infantile maturational process. In WinnicottD.W. (Ed.). (1965). Maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 230–241). New York: International Universities Press.
