Our purpose in this study was to determine whether results of the subscales of the Occupational Personality Profile (OPP) are comparable among various race and language groups. The sample consisted of 234 individuals, who had applied for management positions in various government institutions. The sample was divided into African and white individuals from different language backgrounds. Analyses revealed acceptable reliability coefficients on most of the subscales of the OPP. Significant differences among means were however found on a number of the subscales. The practical implications of these findings for employment testing and adverse impact are discussed.
AbrahamsF. (1996). The cross-cultural comparability of the 16PF. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Department of Industrial Psychology, University of South Africa.
3.
AbrahamsF. (2002). The (un)fair usage of the 16PF (SA92) in South Africa: A response to C.H. Prinsloo and I. Ebersöhn. South African Journal of Psychology, 32, 58–61.
4.
AbrahamsF.MauerK. F. (1999). The comparability of the constructs of the 16PF in the South African context. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 25, 53–59.
5.
BarrickM.R. (2001, June). Personality testing, controversial no more. Keynote address presented at the fourth annual Industrial Psychology conference, Pretoria, South Africa. Retrieved August, 3, 2005, from http://www.siopsa.org.za/Conference/2001archive_keynote.htm.
6.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44. Retrieved August, 3, 2005, from http://weblinks1.epnet.com.
7.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K.JudgeT. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.
8.
BedellB.Van EedenR.Van StadenF. (1999). Culture as moderator variable in psychological test performance: Issues and trends in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 25, 1–7.
9.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319.
10.
De BeerM. (2004). Use of differential item functioning (DIF) analysis for bias analysis in test construction. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30, 52–58.
11.
Employment Equity Act, Act 55, 1998. Republic of South Africa Government Gazette, 400 ŝ 19370.
12.
FoxcroftC. (2004). Planning a psychological test in the multicultural South African context. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30, 8–15.
13.
FoxcroftC.PatersonH.le RouxN.HerbstD. (2004). Psychological assessment in South Africa: a needs analysis. The test use patterns and needs of psychological assessment practitioners.Pretoria: The Health Professions Council of South Africa.
14.
GoldbergL.R.SweeneyD.MerendaP.F.HughesJ.E.Jr. (1998). Demographic variables and personality: The effects of gender, age, education, and ethnic/racial status on self-descriptions of personality attributes. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 393–403.
JohnsonD. L.KleinerB. H. (2000). A comparative view of employment testing. Management Research News, 23, 99–102.
17.
La GrangeL.RoodtG. (2001). Personality and cognitive ability as predictors of the job performance of insurance sales people. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 27, 35–43.
18.
LievensF.CoetsierP.De FruytF.De MaeseneerJ. (2002). Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: A five factor model perspective. Medical Education, 36, 1050–1056.
19.
MeiringD. (2000, June). Revisiting the cross cultural comparability of the 16 Personality Factor Inventory (16PF) in the South African context. Paper presented at the Industrial Psychology conference (incorporating the Psychometrics conference), Pretoria, South Africa.
20.
MeiringD. (2007). Bias and equivalence of psychological measures in South Africa. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Tilburg.
21.
MeiringD.Van de VijverF. J. R.RothmannS. (2006). Bias in an adapted version of the 15FQ+ Questionnaire in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 36, 340–356.
22.
MeiringD.Van de VijverF. J. R.RothmannS.BarrickM. R. (2005). Construct, item and method bias of cognitive and personality tests in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31, 1–8.
23.
OnesD. S.AndersonN. (2002). Gender and ethnic group differences on personality scales in selection: Some British data. Journal of Occupational & Organisational Psychology, 75, 255–276.
24.
OnesD.S.ViswesvaranC. (1998). Gender, age and race differences on overt integrity tests: Analyses across four large-scale applicant data sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35–42.
25.
OwenK. (1986). Test and item bias: Administration of the Senior Aptitude Test, Mechanical Insight Test, and the Scholastic Proficiency Battery to white, Indian, black and coloured Technikon students.Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
26.
PackmanT.BrownG.EnglertP.SisarichH.BauerF. (2005). Differences in personality traits across ethnic groups in New Zealand and across an international sample. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34, 77–85.
27.
PrinslooC. H.EbersöhnI. (2002). Fair usage of the 16PF in personality assessment in South Africa: A response to Abrahams and Mauer with special reference to issues of research methodology. South African Journal of Psychology, 32, 48–57.
RetiefA.I. (1992). The cross-cultural utility of the SAPQ — bias or fruitful differences?South African Journal of Psychology, 22, 202–207.
30.
RosenthalR.RosnowR.L. (2008). Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (3rd edn). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
31.
SalgadoJ.F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30–45.
32.
SaundersE. (2002). Assessing human competence: Practical guidelines for South African managers.Randburg, South Africa: Knowledge Resources.
33.
SchmidtF.L.OnesD.S.HunterJ.E. (1992). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 627–670.
34.
TaylorT.R.BoeyensJ.C.A. (1991). The comparability of the scores of blacks and whites on the South African Personality Questionnaire: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 1–11.
35.
TaylorN.De BruinG. P. (2005). Basic Traits Inventory: Technical manual.Johannesburg: Jopie van Rooyen & Partners SA.
36.
TredouxN. (n.d.). Occupational Personality Profile: South African users guide and research reference.Johannesburg: Psytech SA.
37.
Van de VijverF.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research.London: Sage Publications.
38.
Van Der MerweR. P. (1999). Psychological assessment in industry. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 25, 8–11.
39.
Van der WaltH. S.MeiringD.RothmannS.BarrickM. R. (2002). Meta-analysis of the relationship between personality measurements and job performance in South Africa. Paper presented at the fifth annual conference of the society for Industrial & Organisational Psychology of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa. Retrieved August, 3, 2005, from http://www.siopsa.org.za.
