Participatory research adopts the political position of engendering empowerment and generating social change. The incorporation of research participants into the management, planning, and implementation of the research process is assumed to lead to changes on individual and social levels. However, change originating in the participatory research (PR) process is based on more than just the moral imperatives inherent in PR. PR techniques rely heavily on mapping and diagramming activities. Vygotsky's notion of mediation is used to demonstrate the epistemological value of the visualization mechanisms inherent in many participatory techniques.
BhanaA. (2006). Participatory Action Research: A practical guide for realistic radicals. In BlancheTerre M.DurrheimK.PainterD. (eds), Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (2nd edn., pp. 429–442). Cape Town: UCT Press.
2.
BlackmoreC.IsonR. (1988). Boundaries for thinking and action. In ThomasA.ChatawayJ.WuytsM. (eds), Finding out fast: Investigative skills for policy and development (pp. 41–66). London: Sage.
3.
BoettigerM. (2004). A critical reflection on the use of participatory research techniques. Unpublished Honours project. School of Psychology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.
4.
ChambersR. (1992). Rapid but relaxed and participatory rural appraisal: Towards applications in health and nutrition. In ScrimshawN.S.GleasonG.R. (eds), RAP: Rapid assessment procedures: qualitative methodologies for planning and evaluation of health related programmes (pp. 295–305). Boston, MA: International Nutrition Foundation for Developing Countries.
5.
ChambersR. (1994a). Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 22, 1253–1268.
6.
ChambersR. (1994b). The origins and practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal. World Development, 22, 953–969.
7.
EdwardsB. (1982). Drawing on the right side of the brain.London: Fontana/Collins.
8.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed.New York: Seabury Press.
9.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays.New York: Basic Books.
10.
Hajdukowski-AhmedM. (1998). Bakhtin without borders: Participatory action research in the social sciences. South Atlantic Quarterly, 97, 643–668.
11.
HouseE. R. (1991). Realism in research. Educational Researcher, 2–9.
12.
JohnsonH.MayouxL. (1998). Investigation as empowerment: Using participatory methods. In ThomasA.ChatawayJ.WuytsM. (eds), Finding out fast: Investigative skills for policy and development (pp. 147–171). London: Sage.
13.
KellyK. (1994). The hermeneutical function of distanciation. Paper presented at the HSRC Conference: Knowledge, method and the public good, 18–22 July, Pretoria, South Africa.
14.
KellyK. (2006). Lived experience and interpretation: The balancing act in qualitative analysis. In BlancheTerre M.DurrheimK.PainterD. (eds), Research in practice: applied methods for the social sciences (2nd edn., pp. 345–369). Cape Town: UCT Press.
15.
KellyK.Van der RietM. (2001). Participatory research in community settings: Processes, methods and challenges. In. SeedatM.DuncanN.LazarusS. (eds), Community psychology: theory, method and practice. South African and other perspectives (pp. 159–188). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
16.
LatherP. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 257–277.
17.
MaguireP. (1987). Doing participatory research: a feminist approach.Amherst, Mass.: Centre for International Education.
18.
OakleyP.MarsdenD. (1985). Approaches to participation in rural development.Geneva: ILO.
19.
ReasonP. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edn., pp. 324–339). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
20.
KitchenerStrohm K. (1983). Cognition, metacognition and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232.
21.
TheisJ.GradyH. M. (1991). Participatory rapid appraisal for community development: A training manual based on experiences in the Middle East and North Africa.London: Save the Children Federation and IIED.
22.
Van der RietM. (2008). Participatory research and the philosophy of social science: Beyond the moral imperative. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 546–565.
23.
Von MaltzahnR.Van der RietM. (2006). A critical reflection on participatory methods as an alternative mode of enquiry. New Voices in Psychology, 2, 108–128.
24.
Van VlaenderenH.NevesD. (2004). Participatory action research and local knowledge in community contexts. In HookD.MkhizeN.J.KiguwaP.CollinsA. (eds), Critical Psychology (pp. 445–464). Cape Town: UCT Press.
25.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
VygotskyL.S. (1981a). The instrumental method in psychology. In WertschJ.V. (ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 134–143). Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe.
27.
VygotskyL.S. (1981b). The genesis of higher mental functions. In WertschJ.V. (ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe.
28.
WertschJ.V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In RogoffB.WertschJ.V. (eds), Children's learning in the zone of proximal development (pp. 162–182). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
29.
WertschJ.V.KannerB.G. (1992). A socio-cultural approach to intellectual development. In SternbergR.J.BergC.A. (eds), Intellectual Development (pp. 328–349). New York: Cambridge University Press.
