The Intractability of Militarised Masculinity: A Case Study of Former Self-Defence Unit Members in the Kathorus Area,South Africa

Abstract

The study explores the struggle to maintain and transform a ‘masculine’ identity acquired primarily as a consequence of serving as part of a township-based paramilitary force in the pre-democratic South Africa. Based on accounts of former Self-Defence Unit (SDU) members from the Kathorus region (a group of townships on the perimeter of Johannesburg), the article explores some of the forces that influenced young men to become involved in political violence, the status this bestowed upon them, and how aspects of their ‘militarised identity have come into conflict with new constructs of masculinity in a post-apartheid South Africa’. Although the experiences of South African ex-combatants have been documented in a number of reports and articles (Gear, 2002; Marks, 2001; Mashike & Mokalobe, 2003; Xaba, 2001), this article seeks to highlight the intractability of a particular form of masculine identity attained during the pivotal stage of early and late adolescent development. The negative consequences of this weddedness to a militarised masculinity for both the men themselves and the broader society are explored, together with some of the dimensions that appear to make this identity so compelling and so difficult to transform. The article draws upon theoretical understandings that suggest that gender and masculinity are socially constructed, and is based on data collected by means of individual interviews and focus groups conducted, with former combatants. The interviews reveal that images of militarised masculinity were popularised and dominant during the liberation struggle against apartheid, particularly amongst urban youth who were recruited into resistance activities. Young combatants were expected to be strong, brave, tough, fearless, aggressive, and violent. In many urban townships, young boys who were not part of the liberation struggle and youth politics were constructed as lacking in masculinity. Post 1994, virtually overnight, young combatants were expected to relinquish their militarised roles and to adopt new forms of masculinity without the facilitation of any demilitarisation programme to address the complexities of this transformation in their social and personal identity. The interviews reveal that many of these former combatants feel betrayed, forgotten, and alienated in post-apartheid South Africa. Some have carried their militarised masculinities into the new democracy, continuing to be involved in violent activities and risk-taking behaviours. Although many of them appear to be suffering from symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and other aspects of war trauma, attending counselling is seen as a sign of weakness and as an insult to militarised masculinity. The article argues that interventions to assist with identity transformation and greater social integration of such marginalised young men need to take account of these dynamics.

Keywords

former combatant masculinity militarised masculinity post-traumatic stress disorder

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Banister

Burman

Parker

Taylor

Tindall

(Eds.). (1995). Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Barolsky

(2001). Necklacing: Moeleketsi's case study in Katlehong. Unpublished master's research report, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Barolsky

(2005). Transitioning out of violence: Snapshots from Kathorus. Research report, Centre for Study of Violence and Reconciliation, Braamfontein, South Africa.

Clowes

(2003). Historical representations of ‘race’, masculinity and homosexuality. In Ratele

Duncan

(Eds.), Social psychology: Identities and relationships (pp. 303–319). Cape Town: UCT Press.

Cock

(1992). Women, the military and militarisation: Some questions raised by the South African case. Research report, Centre for Study of Violence and Reconciliation, Braamfontein, South Africa.

Cock

(2001). Gun violence and masculinity in contemporary South Africa. In Morrell

(Ed.), Changing men in Southern Africa (pp. 345–368). Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

Connell

R. W.

(1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Conway

(2003, June 22–25). Masculinity, citizenship and political objection to compulsory military service in the South African Defence Force: The case of Ivan Toms. Paper presented at conference, ‘Sex and Secrecy’, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

10.

David

D. S.

Brannon

(1976). The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. New York: Random House.

11.

Deen

(2006). Struggling to survive: Children in armed conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Unpublished report, United Nations Security Council, Geneva.

12.

Dolan

(2002). Collapsing masculinities and weak states: A case study of Northern Uganda. In Clevear

(Ed.), Masculinities matter! Men gender and development (pp. 57–79). London: Zed Books.

13.

Freeman

(1993). Seeking identity: Township youth and social development. South African Journal of Psychology, 23(2), 157–167.

14.

Gagnon

(2003, March 10–12). Examining the role of masculine social constructionism as an obstacle to peace. Paper presented at conference, ‘Peace Building’, London.

15.

Gear

(2002). Wishing us away: Challenges facing ex-combatants in the ‘new’ South Africa. Research report, Centre for Study of Violence and Reconciliation, Braamfontein, South Africa.

16.

Gear

(in press). Now that the war is over: Ex-combatants, transition and the question of violence. Research report, Centre for Study of Violence and Reconciliation, Braamfontein, South Africa.

17.

Goldstein

J. S.

(2003). War and gender. London: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Grossman

(1995). On killing: The psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society. New York: Backbay.

19.

Horrocks

(1994). Masculinity in crisis: Myths, fantasies and realities. London: Macmillan.

20.

Huggins

M. K.

Haritos-Fatouros

(1998). Bureaucratizing masculinities among Brazilian torturers and murderers. In Bowker

L. H.

(Ed.), Masculinities and violence (pp. 345–456). London: Sage.

21.

Karner

(1998). Engendering violent men: Oral stories of military masculinity. In Bowker

L. H.

(Ed.), Masculinities and violence (pp. 123–134). London: Sage.

22.

Klein

(1999, October 1–8). The contribution of the military and military discourse to the construction of masculinity in society. Paper presented at seminar, ‘Men and Violence against Women’, University of Munster, Germany.

23.

Kuhn

(2003). Pro-social identity paths in a group of former Self-Defence Unit members. Unpublished honours research project, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

24.

Marks

(2001). Young warriors: Youth politics, identity and violence in South Africa. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press.

25.

Marks

McKenzie

(1995, September 21–23). Political pawns or social agents? A look at militarized youth in South Africa. Paper presented at conference, ‘Confronting Crime’, Cape Town.

26.

Mashike

(2004). ‘You are a time bomb…’: Ex-combatants in post-conflict South Africa. Society in Transition, 35(1), 1–18.

27.

Mashike

Mokalobe

(2003). Reintegration into civilian life: The case of former MK and APLA combatants. Cape Town: UCT Press.

28.

Mendelsohn

Straker

(1998). Child Soldiers: Psychosocial Implications of the Graca Machel/UN study. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 4(4), 399–413.

29.

Minnaar

(1996, October 10–11). Self-defence units (SDUs): Post-April 1994 — What role in community policing? Paper presented at the Biennial South African Political Studies Association colloquium, Rustenburg, South Africa.

30.

Morrell

(2001). Changing men in Southern Africa. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

31.

Motumi

McKenzie

(1998). After the war: Demobilization in South Africa. In Cock

McKenzie

(Eds.), From defence to development: Redirecting military resources in South Africa (pp. 181–207). Cape Town: David Philip.

32.

Mtebule

(2002). Identity in the making: Researching young black urban masculine identity in the post-apartheid era. Unpublished master's dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

33.

Palmary

(2005). Engendering wartime conflict: Women and war trauma. Violence and Transition series (Volume 7). Centre for Study of Violence and Reconciliation, Braamfontein, South Africa.

34.

Pollack

Levant

(1998). New psychology of men. New York: Wiley.

35.

Steinberg

(1994). The violence on the East Rand: 1990–1994. Report commissioned by the Urban Foundation, Johannesburg.

36.

Stevens

Lockhat

(1997). Coca-cola kids: Reflections on black adolescent identity development in post apartheid South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 27(4), 250–255.

37.

Sveaass

Castillo

(2000). From war hero to cripple: An interview study on psychosocial intervention and social reconstruction in Nicaragua. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 6(2), 113–133.

38.

Xaba

(2001). Masculinity and its malcontents: The confrontation between ‘struggle masculinity and ‘post-struggle masculinity’ (1990–1997). In Morrell

(Ed.), Changing men in Southern Africa (pp. 105–124). Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

39.

Vetten

(August 16, 1998). War and the making of men and women. Sunday Independent, 14.

40.

Whitehead

(2005). Man to man violence: How masculinity may work as a dynamic risk factor. The Howard Journal, 44(4), 411–420.

41.

Whitehead

S. M.

Barrett

(1994). The masculine reader. London: Polity Press.