It is 40 years since the South African Navy (SAN) first started with the psychological selection of their submariners. This article traces the development of the selection process over the past four decades. Initially, it involved an intensive selection process, which included pen-and-paper tests, questionnaires, interviews, and skills assessments. Later validation of the process, as well as practical constraints, produced a number of consolidated pen-and-paper test batteries. The advent of democracy and the changing composition of the SAN forced the navy to make drastic changes to the selection model and to introduce a more fair system of psychometric assessment of individuals in the larger South African society. These effects are discussed before the article concludes with a view towards the future.
BiesheuvelS. (1965). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 16, 295–324.
2.
CoupeS. (1996). Testing for aptitude and motivation in South African industry: The work of the National Institute for Personnel Research. Business History Review, 70, 43–68.
3.
FraserS. (2003). A force for South Africa. GDR Publications. Retrieved October 27, 2003, from www.ets-news.com/sasubs.htm.
4.
GiesekeM. (1969a). Die meting van motivering van vrywilligers vir die duikboot-diens [The measurement of motivation of volunteers for the submarine service]. U/Pers 17.Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
5.
GiesekeM. (1969b). Prediction of the ability of naval ratings to learn French. U/Pers 14. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
6.
GrieselR. D. (1967). Personnel organisation on a Royal Navy submarine. U/Pers 5. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
7.
GrieselR. D. (1970). Preliminary assessment of a simulated stress situation for the selection of personnel for submarine service. U/Pers 25. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
8.
MacKayM. (1972). Selection of submarine crews for the SA Navy: Progress report and preliminary follow-up study. U/Pers 38. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
9.
McGuireF. L. (1990). Psychology aweigh! A history of clinical psychology in the United States Navy, 1900–1988.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
MullerJ.SchepersJ. (2003). The predictive validity of the selection battery used for junior leader training within the South African National Defence Force. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(3), 87–98.
11.
MurdochB. D. (1976). Electroencephalographs criteria in the selection of divers and submariners: 1972–1975. U/Pers 67. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
12.
MurdochB.D. (1981). The recording of EEG's in the SADF: Selection of divers, submariners, pilots and candidates for South African Airways. U/Pers 115. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
13.
RedelinghuysM. J. (1968). A brief investigation into the relationship between EEG abnormality, home background and personality adjustment in a sample of naval ratings. U/Pers 10. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
14.
SammonsM. T. (2005). Psychology in the public sector: Addressing the psychological effects of combat in the US Navy. American Psychologist, 60(8), 899–909.
15.
SpagnolettiM. P. (1974). Selection of submarine crew for the SA Navy: Validation of the NIPR submarine selection battery. U/Pers 55. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
16.
SteadG. B. (2002). The transformation of psychology in a post-apartheid South Africa: An overview. International Journal of Group Tensions, 31(1), 79–102.
17.
TemplerA. J. (1970). The construction of a projective measure of aggression for the SADF. U/Pers 31. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
18.
Van WijkC. H. (2003). Psychological challenges for South African Navy submariners in adjusting to the Class 209 Submarines. African Armed Forces Journal, June, 24–27.
19.
Van ZylJ. N. (1984). Die seleksie van duikbootbemanning [The selection of submariners].Simon's Town: Naval Medical Centre.
20.
VorsterD. J. M. (1972). Die sielkundige keuring van duikbootpersonnel in die SAW [The psychological selection of submarine personnel in the South African Defence Force]. South African Psychologist, 2(2), 21–32.
21.
WatersA. H. (1995). Duikbootprojek: 'n Ondersoek na die verband tussen die OTIS Verstandstoets en Raven se Progressiewe Matrikse [Submarine project: An investigation of the relationship between the OTIS Mental Test and Raven's Progressive Matrices].Simon's Town: Institute for Maritime Medicine.
