Crossed-categorisation and extended contact are two different bases for improving intergroup relations. Crossed-categorisation refers to the crossing of two dichotomous social dimensions, resulting in four groups (double ingroup, double outgroup, and two mixed groups). The extended contact hypothesis proposes that knowledge about ingroup–outgroup friendships can lead to more positive intergroup attitudes. The present research combined extended contact and crossed-categorisation to test whether black and white university students' view of the police, perceived racism of police, desired closeness to police, and willingness to join police were improved through extended contact with a black (or white) police officer via a black (or white) acquaintance (four possibilities). Double-outgroup extended contact for both white and black participants, and mixed-group extended contact for whites (showing a social exclusion pattern), were associated with worse public–police relations. In contrast, doubleingroup extended contact for whites, and mixed-group extended contact for blacks (showing a social inclusion pattern) were associated with improved relations.
AbramsD.EllerA.BryantJ. (2006). An age apart: The effects of intergenerational contact and stereotype threat on performance and intergroup bias. Psychology and Aging, 21, 691–702.
2.
AbramsD.HoggM. A.MarquesJ. M. (Eds.) (2005). The social psychology of exclusion and inclusion.New York: Psychology Press.
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
BantonM. (1994). Discrimination.Open University Press: Buckingham, UK.
BogardusE. S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Science Research, 17, 265–271.
7.
BrewerM. B.HoH. K.LeeJ. Y.MillerN. (1987). Social identity and social distance among Hong Kong school children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 156–165.
8.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343.
CameronL.RutlandA. (2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children's prejudice toward the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 469–488.
11.
ClancyA.HoughM.AustR.KershawC. (2001). Crime, policing and justice: The experience of ethnic minorities, findings from the 2000 British crime survey. Home Office Research Study 223.London: The Home Office. Retrieved September 13, 2006, from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/hors223.pdf.
12.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM. (1999). Differentia] evaluation of crossed category groups: Patterns, processes, and reducing intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 307–333.
13.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM.CairnsE. (2001). Multiple identities in Northern Ireland: Hierarchical ordering in the representation of group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 501–514.
14.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM.RichardsZ.PaoliniS. (2003). Inclusiveness and crossed categorization: Effects on co-joined category evaluations of in-group and out-group primes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 25–38.
15.
DeschampsJ. C.DoiseW. (1978). Crossed category memberships in intergroup relations. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 141–158). London: Academic Press.
16.
DoiseW. (1978). Groups and individuals: Explanations in social psychology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
EllerA.AbramsD.VikiG. T.ImaraD. A.PeerbuxS. (2007). Stay cool, hang loose, admit nothing: Race, intergroup contact, and public-police relations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(3), 213–224.
18.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model.Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
19.
HavisS.BestD. (2004). Stop and search complaints (2000–2001): A police complaints authority study.London: The Police Complaints Authority.
20.
HewstoneM.IslamM. R.JuddC. M. (1993). Models of crossed categorization and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 779–793.
JeffersonT.WalkerM. A. (1993). Attitudes to the police of ethnic minorities in a provincial city. British Journal of Criminology, 33, 251–266.
23.
LeyensJ. Ph.YzerbytV. Y. (1992). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 549–569.
24.
LiebkindK.HaaramoJ.Jasinskaja-LahtiI. (2000). Effects of contact and personality on intergroup attitudes of different professionals. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 171–181.
25.
LiebkindK.McAlisterA. L. (1999). Extended contact through peer modelling to promote tolerance in Finland. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 765–780.
26.
MacphersonW. (1999). The Stephen Lawrence inquiry: Report of an inquiry by Sir William Macpherson of Cluny.London: H.M. Stationery Office.
27.
Marcus-NewhallA.MillerN.HoltzR.BrewerM. B. (1993). Cross-cutting category membership with role assignment: A means of reducing intergroup bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 125–146.
MigdalM. J.HewstoneM.MullenB. (1998). The effects of crossed categorization on intergroup evaluations: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 303–324.
30.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770–786.
31.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
32.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
33.
RoccasS.BrewerM. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 23–45). ahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
TajfelH. (Ed.) (1978). Differentiation between social groups.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory.Oxford & New York: Blackwell.
39.
TylerT. R.WakslakC. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42, 253–281.
40.
UrbanL. M.MillerN. (1998). A theoretical analysis of crossed categorization effects: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 894–908.
41.
VanbeselaereN. (1987). The effects of dichotomous and crossed social categorizations upon intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 143–156.
42.
VescioT. K.JuddC. M.KwanV. S. Y. (2004). The crossed-categorization hypothesis: Evidence of reductions in the strength of categorization, but not intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 478–496.
43.
VikiG. T.CulmerM. J.EllerA.AbramsD. (2006). Race and willingness to cooperate with the police: The role of quality of contact, attitudes towards the behaviour and subjective norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 285–302.
44.
WoodJ.VikiG. T. (2004). Public perceptions of crime and punishment. In AdlerJ. (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Debates, concepts and practice (pp. 16–32). Uffculme, UK: Willan.
45.
WortleyR. K.HomelR. J. (1995). Police prejudice as a function of training and outgroup contact: A longitudinal investigation. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 305–317.
46.
WrightS. C.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.
