Domestic violence is recognised as a pervasive problem in South Africa. This study focused on the narratives of four abused women and attempted to establish the significance of sheltering in their lives. A qualitative research design was used based on semi-structured interviews, which were analysed thematically. The findings supported past research, indicating that although the women's experiences were diverse they contained many features similar to those reported in previous studies. Each of the four women was not a passive victim, having taken the decision to leave an abusive and violent relationship. Sheltering was found to provide the protected space necessary to move beyond the abuse, and in addition provided the structure and social support necessary to start to transcend the abuse. Sheltering was found to fill gaps created by a society in transition, in which abuse and violence are often tolerated or condoned within existing social and family structures.
AnglessT.MacOnachieM. (1996). Battered women: Problems and proposals. In GlanzL.SpiegelA. (Eds.), Violence and family life in contemporary South Africa (pp. 151–164). Pretoria: HSRC Press.
2.
CampbellJ.RoseL.KubJ.NeddD. (1998). Voices of strength and resistance: A contextual and longitudinal analysis of women's responses to battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13(6), 743–762.
3.
CarlsonB. (1984). Causes and maintenance of domestic violence: An ecological analysis. Social Service Review (December), 569–587.
4.
ChoiceP.LamkeL. (1997). A conceptual approach to understanding abused women's stay/leave decisions. Journal of Family Issues, 18(3), 290–314.
5.
DangorZ.FedlerJ.ParkY. (2000). Introduction. In ParkY.FedlerJ.DangorZ. (Eds.), Reclaiming women's spaces: New perspectives on violence against women and sheltering in South Africa (pp. 11–14). Johannesburg: NISAA Institute for Women's Development.
6.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1992). Women, violence, and social change.London: Routledge.
7.
DwyerD.SmokowskiP.BricoutJ.WodarskiJ. (1996). Domestic violence and woman battering: Theories and practice implications. In RobertsA. (Ed.), Helping battered women: New perspectives and remedies (pp. 67–81). New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
EisikovitsZ.GoldblattH.WinstokZ. (1999). Partner accounts of intimate violence: Towards a theoretical model. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 80(6), 606–619.
9.
FedlerJ.TanzerZ. (2000). A world in denial: International perspectives on violence against women. In ParkY.FedlerJ.DangorZ. (Eds.), Reclaiming women's spaces: New perspectives on violence against women and sheltering in South Africa (pp. 17–46.) Johannesburg: NISAA Institute for Women's Development.
10.
ForemanS.DallosR. (1993). Domestic violence. In DallosR.McLaughlinE. (Eds.), Social problems and the family (pp. 7–45). London: Sage.
11.
GaskellG. (2000). Individual and group interviewing. In BauerM.GaskellG. (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image, and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 38–56). London: Sage.
12.
GoodmanL.KossM.FitzgeraldL.RussoN.KeitaG. (1993). Male violence against women: Current research and future directions. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1054–1058.
13.
GreenD. (1999). Gender violence in Africa: African women's responses.London: MacMillan.
14.
JohnsonH. (1998). Rethinking survey research on violence against women. In DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 23–51). London: Sage.
15.
KaplanH.SadockB. (1988). Synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences clinical psychiatry (5th ed.). Baltimore, OH: Williams & Wilkins.
16.
KirkwoodC. (1997). Leaving abusive partners: From the scars of survival to the wisdom for change. London: Sage.
17.
LawlessE. (2001). Women escaping violence: Empowerment through narrative.Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
18.
LawsonD. (2003). Incidence, explanations, and treatment of partner violence. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81 (Winter), 19–32.
19.
LempertL. (1996). Women's strategies for survival: Developing agency in abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 11(3), 269–289.
20.
LongC.ZietkiewiczE. (2006). Going Places: Black women negotiating race and gender in post-apartheid South Africa. In SheferT.BoonzaierF.KiguwaP. (Eds.), The gender of psychology (pp. 198–219). Cape Town: UCT Press.
21.
LosekeD. (1992). Battered women and shelters: The social construction of wife abuse.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
22.
LucasW. (1974a). The case-survey method: Aggregating case experience.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
23.
LucasW. (1974b). The case survey and alternative methods for research aggregation.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
24.
MacMillanR.GartnerR. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(November), 947–958.
25.
McWilliamsM. (1998). Violence against women in societies under stress. In DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 111–140). London: Sage.
26.
NeumanW. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
ParkY.ShaikF.RasoolS. (2000). Indigenous sanctuaries: A global view of shelters for abused women. In ParkY.FedlerJ.DangorZ. (Eds.), Reclaiming women's spaces: New perspectives on violence against women and sheltering in South Africa (pp. 209–238). Johannesburg: NISAA Institute for Women's Development.
28.
RamazanogluC.HollandJ. (1993). Women's sexuality and men's appropriation of desire. In RamazanogluC. (Ed.), Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and feminism (pp. 239–261). London: Routledge.
29.
RasoolS.VermaakK.PharoahR.LouwA.StavrouA. (2002). Violence against women: A national survey.Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.
30.
RigerS. (1993). What's wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(3), 279–293.
31.
RosenK.StithS. (1995). Women terminating abusive dating relationships: A qualitative study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(1), 155–160.
32.
RusbultC.MartzJ. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 558–571.
33.
SimonsR.LinK.GordonL. (1998). Socialization in the family of origin and male dating violence: A prospective study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 467–478.
34.
SorensonS. (1996). Violence against women: Examining ethnic differences and commonalities. Evaluation Review, 20(2), 123–145.
35.
VettenL. (2000). Gender, race, and power dynamics in the face of social change: Deconstructing violence against women in South Africa. In ParkY.FedlerJ.DangorZ. (Eds.), Reclaiming women's spaces: New perspectives on violence against women and sheltering in South Africa (pp. 47–80). Johannesburg: NISAA Institute for Women's Development.
36.
WallaceH. (1998). Victimology: Legal, psychological, and social perspectives.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
WilligC. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method.Buckingham: Open University Press.
38.
WilsonM.DalyM. (1998). Lethal and nonlethal violence against wives and the evolutionary psychology of male sexual proprietariness. In DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 199–230). London: Sage.
39.
WrightR. (2006). The significance of sheltering in the lives of four women affected by abusive relationships. Unpublished master's research report, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
