Active and collaborative learning can be facilitated in large lectures through structured and well-planned interventions such as small group work (Felder, 1997). This may be an effective strategy as it encourages students to become more critical and responsible in their learning. However, students may not prefer this method or view it as useful, which could lead to hostility and obstruction of the methodology. This report details an evaluation of student perceptions of two lecture approaches: traditional lecturing and lectures using ‘small group’ work. Students preferred the ‘small group’ work and perceived it to be useful to their learning. Themes that emerged from the analysis complemented social constructivist literature.
BiggsJ. (1996). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does.Buckingham: Open University Press.
4.
BitzerE. (2001). Understanding co-operative learning: A case study in tracing relationships to social constructivism and South African socio-educational thought. South African Journal of Higher Education, 15(2), 98–104.
5.
BloomB. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domain.New York: McKay.
6.
BridglandA.BlanchardP. (2001). Flexible delivery/flexible learning: Does it make a difference?. Australian Academic and Resource Libraries, 32(3), 177–192.
7.
BrownS. (1997). Making your lectures more interesting. Academic Development, 3(1), 123–129.
8.
CheeY. S. (1997). Toward social constructivism: Changing the culture of learning in schools. Proceedings of ICCE 97 — International Conference on Computers in Education, Malaysia (pp. 81–88). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
9.
DeweyJ. (1963). Experience and education. 1938. Reprint. New York: MacMillan.
10.
EdwardN. S. (2001). Evaluation of a constructivist approach to student induction in relation to student learning styles. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 429–440.
11.
EnersonD. M.JohnsonR. N.MilnerS.PlankK. M. (1997). Learning to teach; Teaching to learn.University Park, PA: Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching.
12.
FelderR. (1997, June 15–18). Beating the numbers game: Effective teaching in large classes. Paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference, Milwaukee, WI. Retrieved January 11, 2005, from http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-ublic/Papers/Largeclasses.htm.
13.
FelderR.BrentR. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 44, 43–47.
14.
FelderR.BrentR. (2003). Learning by doing. Chemical Engineering Education, 37(4), 282–283.
15.
GibbsG. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning.London: Technical and Educational Services.
16.
GravettS.HenningE. (1998). Teaching as dialogic mediation: A learning-centred view of higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 12(2), 60–68.
17.
Holt-ReynoldsD. (2000). What does the teacher do? Constructivist pedagogies and prospective teachers' beliefs about the role of a teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 21–32.
18.
MasonM. (2000). Teachers as critical mediators of knowledge. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(2), 343–352.
19.
McLeodJ. (2003). An introduction to counselling.Buckingham: Open University Press.
OakleyB.FelderR.BrentR.ElhajjI. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9–34.
22.
PickworthG. (2001). Developing an instrument to identify MBChB students' approaches to learning. South African Journal of Higher Education, 15(2), 140–145.
23.
SadkerM.SadkerD. (1993). Ensuring equitable participation in college classes. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 49, 49–56.
24.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
WengerE. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
