Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Since the inception of the Internet, research has suggested that a small group of people have a tendency to abuse the Internet and thereby cause damage to their health, their personal life and/or their professional life. Numerous terms, including Internet Addiction Disorder and pathological Internet use, have been used to describe this behaviour and its consequences. More recently, the term, problematic Internet use, has been favoured to describe people who cannot resist engaging with the Internet. This article describes the development and psychometric properties of the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire (PIUQ). The development of the PIUQ was a two-stage process involving a pilot study on a smaller sample (N = 279) and a validation study on a much larger sample (N = 1795). The results of the validation study provided good evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the PIUQ. The exploratory factor analysis suggests that the PIUQ may consist of three sub-scales (i.e., Online preoccupation, Adverse effects and Social interactions), each with good internal reliability. The discussion provides recommendations for future studies using and validating the PIUQ.

Keywords

concurrent validity factor validity internal reliability Internet Addiction Disorder Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire psychometric properties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association (1995). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Azar

(2000). Online experiments: Ethically fair or foul? Monitor in Psychology, 31(4). http://www.apa.org/monitor/apr00/fairorfoul.html (accessed on 4 April 2005).

Brenner

(1997), Psychology of computer use. XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychological Reports, 80, 879–882.

Davis

R. A.

(2001). A cognitive-behavioural model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 17, 187–195.

Davis

R. A.

Flett

G. L.

Besser

(2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 331–345.

Egger

Rauterberg

(1996). Internet behaviour and addiction. http://www.idemployee.id.tue.nl/g.w.m.rauterberg/ibq/report.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2004).

Goodman

(1993). Diagnosis and treatment of sexual addiction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 19, 225–221.

Gorsuch

R. L.

(1974). Factor Analysis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

Griffiths

(1995). Technological addictions. Clinical Psychology Forum, 71, 14–19.

10.

Griffiths

(2000). Does Internet and computer ‘addiction’ exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 211–218.

11.

Griffiths

(2003). Internet abuse in the workplace: Issues and concerns for employers and employment counsellors. Journal of Employment Counselling, 40, 87–96.

12.

Hair

J. F.

Anderson

R. E.

Tatham

R. L.

Black

W. C.

(1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). London: Prentice-Hall.

13.

Lacey

H. J.

(1993). Self-damaging and addictive behaviour in bulimia nervosa: A catchment area study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 190–194.

14.

LaRose

Lin

C. A.

Eastin

M. S.

(2003). Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit or deficient self-regulation. Media Psychology, 5, 225–253.

15.

Lesieur

J. D.

Blume

S. B.

(1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

16.

Morahan-Martin

Schumacher

(2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behaviour, 16, 13–29.

17.

Nua Internet Surveys (September, 2002). How many online? http://www.nua.com/surveys/howmanyonline/index.html (accessed on 9 September 2004).

18.

Petrie

Gunn

(1998). Internet ‘addiction’? The effects of sex, age, depression and introversion. Paper presented at the British Psychology Society Conference. http://phoenix.herts.ac.uk/SDRU/Helen/inter.html (accessed on 13 December 2004).

19.

Pratarelli

M. E.

Browne

B. L.

(2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of Internet use and addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 53–64.

20.

Rosenthal

Rosnow

R. L.

(1991). Essentials of Behavioral Research. Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

21.

Shapira

N. A.

Goldsmith

T. D.

Keck

P. E.

Khosla

U. M.

McElroy

S. L.

(2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57, 267–272.

22.

Widyanto

McMurran

(2004). The psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 449–456.

23.

Young

K. S.

(1996a, August). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. The 104th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

24.

Young

K. S.

(1996b). Addictive use of the Internet: A case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports, 79, 899–902.

25.

Young

K. S.

(1997, August). What makes the Internet addictive: Potential explanations for pathological Internet use. The 105th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.

26.

Young

K. S.

(1999). Internet addiction: Symptoms, evaluation and treatment. In Van de Creek

Jackson

(Eds), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book (pp. 19–31). Sarasota, Florida: Professional Resource Press.

Development and Psychometric Properties of the Problematic Internet use Questionnaire

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References