This study examines the experiences of person-role conflict amongst doctors working in obstetrics and gynaecology with regard to the provision of abortion services in the public sector. Fifteen doctors were interviewed in order to assess their personal experiences and the role forces that were evident, especially in situations where doctors were confronted with the expectation that they terminate pregnancies either on demand or for social reasons. This study explores the role forces that are operating, attitudes towards abortion versus willingness to perform abortions, the potential impact on the quality of service provided, and the personal implications of person-role conflict for the doctors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barometer (1997), Volume 8
2.
BedeianA.ArmenakisA. (1981). A path-analytic study of the consequences of role conflict and ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 417–424
3.
BedeianA.MossholderK.ArmenakisA. (1983). Role perception-outcome relationships: Moderating effects of situational variables. Human Relations, 36(2), 167–184
4.
BerelsonB. (1971). Content Analysis in Communication Research.New York: Free Press
5.
BolesJ.S.BabinB.J. (1996). On the front lines: Stress, conflict, and the customer service provider. Journal of Business Research, 37(1), 41–50
6.
BreakwellG. M. (1990). Interviewing.London: Routledge
7.
BriefA.AldagR. (1976). Correlates of role indicators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(4), 468–472
8.
ChervenakF.FarleyM.WaltersL.HobbinsJ.MahoneyM. (1984). When is termination of pregnancy during the third trimester morally justifiable?. The New England Journal of Medicine, 310(8), 501–504
9.
Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act No. 92 of 1996
10.
DansP. (1992). Medical students and abortion: Reconciling personal beliefs and professional roles at one medical school. Academic Medicine, 67(3), 207–211
11.
DownsC.SmeyakG.MartinE. (1980). Professional Interviewing.New York: Harper & Row
12.
EngelbrechtM.PelserA.NgwenaC.van RensburgD.HeunisC. (1999). A project management strategy to overcome impediments to the operation of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1996 in the Free State: Findings from the survey.Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein
13.
EvansM.DruganA.BottomsS.PlattL.RodeckC.HansmannM.FletcherJ. (1991). Attitudes on the ethics of abortion, sex selection, and selective pregnancy termination among health care professionals, ethicists and clergy likely to encounter such situations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 164, 1092–1099
14.
FrancomeC.SavageW. (1992). Gynaecologists' abortion practice. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 99, 153–157
15.
GranbergD. (1991). Conformity to religious norms regarding abortion. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(2), 267–275
16.
HarrisonA.MontgomeryE.T.LurieM.WilkinsonD. (1996). Barriers to implementing South Africa's Termination of Pregnancy Act: A case study from rural KwaZulu/Natal province (Draft).Centre for epidemiological Research in South Africa (CERSA), Medical Research Council, Hlabisa, South Africa
17.
HolstiO.R. (1969). Content analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities.London: Addison-Wesley Publishing
18.
JacksonS.SchulerR. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 36, 16–78
19.
KeenanA.NewtonT. (1984). Frustration in organisations: Relationships to role stress, climate, and psychological strain. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57, 57–65
20.
KellowayE.K.BarlingJ. (1990). Item content versus item wording: Disentangling role conflict and role ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 738–742
21.
KemeryE.BedeianA.MossholderK.TouliatosJ. (1985). Outcomes of role stress: A multi-sample constructive replication. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 363–375
22.
KhanR. L. (1974). Conflict, ambiguity and overload: Three elements in job stress. In McLeanA. (Ed.), Occupational Stress (pp. 47–61). Springfield Ill: Thomas
23.
KhanR.WolfeD.QuinnR.SnoekD.RosenthalR. A. (1964). Organisational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity.New York: Wiley
24.
KingL. A.KingD. W. (1990). Role conflict and role ambiguity: A critical assessment of construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 48–64
25.
KrippendorffK. (1980). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
26.
LatackJ. (1981). Person/role conflict: Holland's model extended to role-stress research, stress management, and career development. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 89–103
27.
MaraisT. (1997). Abortion values clarification workshops for doctors and nurses. HST Update, 21, 6–7
28.
McQuoid-MasonD.J. (1997). State doctors, freedom of conscience and termination of pregnancy. The Human Rights and Constitutional Law Journal of Southern Africa., 1, 15–17
29.
MilesR. (1975). An empirical test of causal inference between role perceptions of conflict and ambiguity and various personal outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 334–339
30.
MostynB. (1985). The Content Analysis of Qualitative Research Data. In BrennerM.BrownJ.CanterD. (Eds). The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches.London: Academic Press
31.
PetersonM.SmithP.AkandeA.AyesteranS.BochnerS.CallanV.ChoGuk N.JesuinoJ.D'AmorimM.FrancoisP.HofmannK.KoopmanP.LeungK.LimT.MortazaviS.MuneneJ.RadfordM.RopoA.SavageG.SetiadiB.SinhaT.SorensonR.ViedgeC. (1995). Role conflict, ambiguity and overload: A 21-nation study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 429–452
32.
PoggenpoelM.MyburhC.R.H.GmeinerA.C. (1998). One voice regarding the legislation of abortion: Nurses who experience discomfort. Curationis, 21(3), 2–7
33.
PosnerB.RandolphW. (1980). Moderators of role stress among hospital personnel. The Journal of Psychology, 105, 215–224
34.
RizzoJ.HouseR.LirtzmanS. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 151–163
35.
SavageW.FrancomeC. (1989). Gynaecologists' attitudes to abortion. The Lancet, 2, 1323–1324
36.
SheehanM.MunroJ.RyanJ. (1980). Attitudes of medical practitioners towards abortion: A Queensland study. Australian Family Physician, 9, 565–570
37.
Staff Reporters (2002, June 24). Women made to carry out own abortions, The Star, n.p
38.
TancredE. (1997). Aborsie, die nuwe feite. Rooi Rose, Junie, 34–36
39.
TubreT.C.CollinsJ.M. (2000). Jackson and Schuler (1985) revisited: A meta-analysis of the relationships between role ambiguity, role conflict, and job performance. Journal of Management, 26(1), 155–169
40.
Van RooyenC.A.J. (1998). Abortion: A study of final-year social work students' responses to abortion-related issues. Social Work, 34, 295–306
41.
Van SellM.BriefA.SchulerR. (1981). Role conflict and role ambiguity: Integration of the literature and directions for future research. Human Relations, 34(1), 43–71
42.
VarkeyS. J.FonnS. (2000). How far are we? Assessing the implementation of abortion services: A review of literature and work-in-progress.Durban: Health Systems Trust Research Programme
43.
VarkeyS. J.FonnS.KetlhapileM.TintK.S. (1999). Nearly three years since the abortion legislation reform: Assessing awareness of and opinion on the Choice of Termination of Pregnancy Act. Paper presented at the 1999 Reproductive Health Priorities Conference, South Africa
44.
WalkerL. (1996). ‘My work is to help the woman who wants to have a child, not the woman who wants to have an abortion’: Discourses of patriarchy and power among African nurses in South Africa, African Studies, 55(2), 43–67
45.
WestfallJ.KallailK.WallingA. (1991). Abortion attitudes and practices of family and general practice physicians. Journal of Family Practice, 33(1), 47–51
