Fair Usage of the 16PF in Personality Assessment in South Africa: A Response to Abrahams and Mauer with Special Reference to Issues of Research Methodology
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2002
Fair Usage of the 16PF in Personality Assessment in South Africa: A Response to Abrahams and Mauer with Special Reference to Issues of Research Methodology
Against the backdrop of the influence exerted in recent years in South Africa by new legislation and regulatory authorities on personality assessment research and instrument development, the present article highlights important research methodology issues pertaining to the cultural fairness of the 16PF®. The article is a deliberate comment upon the work of Abrahams (1996) and Abrahams and Mauer (1999a, 1999b). As a result, the relevant aspects are illustrated practically and empirically by referring to recent, current and intended South African research. Personality assessment research and instrument development are assumed to require a symbiotic relationship between test developers and test users. The relevant roles and responsibilities of each of the two groups are discussed. A particularly salient brief is to find common ground about methodological issues, the practical usefulness of the relevant assessment devices, user proficiency in administering and interpreting tests, and understanding how research processes intend ensuring quality tools. Some of the issues illustrated in more detail by referring to HSRC and other research on the SA92 and Fifth Editions of the 16PF® are mean scores and their meaning, subgroup differences, language proficiency, research samples and target populations, statistical techniques, and test material as such.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamsF. (1996). The cross-cultural comparability of the 16 Personality Factor inventory (16PF). Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of South AfricaPretoria
2.
AbrahamsF.MauerK.F. (1999a). Qualitative and statistical impacts of home language on responses to the items of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 29, 76–86
3.
AbrahamsF.MauerK.F. (1999b). The comparability of the constructs of the 16PF in the South African context. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 25(1), 53–59
4.
AERA / APA / NCME*. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. (*American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education)
5.
AugustynJ.C.D.Van WykA.J. (1988). Die Sestienpersoonlikheidsfaktorvraelys as hulpmiddel by die takseersentrum (The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire as tool to the assessment centre). Journal of Industrial Psychology, 14(2), 25–27
6.
BedellB.Van EedenR.Van StadenF. (1999). Culture as moderator variable in psychological test performance: Issues and trends in South Africa. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 15(3), 1–7
7.
Cape Times. (4 October 1999). US psychometric tests ‘no good in SA’.http://www.iol.co.za
ConnS.R.RiekeM.L. (1994). The 16PF Fifth Edition Technical Manual.Champaign, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing
10.
DaleG.J. (1995). Mental alertness, personality traits and work performance in the selection of supervisors. Unpublished Master's dissertation, University of South AfricaPretoria
11.
EllisB.B. (1995). Examination of the measurement equivalence of a Spanish version of the 16PF using Item Response Theory. Paper presented at the 103rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, 11–15 August 1995
12.
EllisB.B.MeadA. (1998). Measurement equivalence of a 16PF translation: An IRT differential item and test functioning analysis. Paper presented at the 24th International Congress of Applied Psychology, San Francisco, CA, 9–14 August 1998 (In N.K. Tanzer (Chair), Cross-cultural assessment and test adaptations, symposium)
13.
ErasmusP.ArumugamS. (1998). Psychometric testing is … dead. People Dynamics, 16(9), 39–41
14.
FulkersonJ.R. (1998). Assessment across cultures. In JeanneretR.SilzerR. (Eds), Individual psychological assessment: Predicting behavior in organizational settings (pp. 330–362). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
15.
GhorpadeJ.HattrupK.LackritzJ.R. (1999). The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research: A test of three personality scales across two countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 670–679
16.
GouwsJ.S.CronjéA. (1995). Werkafwesigheid: 'n Studie van vragmotorbestuurders (Job absenteeism: A study of truck drivers). Journal of Industrial Psychology, 21(2), 18–22
17.
KempN. (1999). Psychometric testing is not dead. People Dynamics, 17(3), 14–17
18.
MeiringD. (2000). Revisiting the cross-cultural comparability of the 16 Personality Factor Inventory (16PF) in the South African context. Paper presented on 9 June 2000 at the Industrial Psychology Conference (incorporating the Psychometrics Conference) arranged by the Society for Industrial Psychology, a Division of the Psychological Society of South Africa, CSIR Conference Centre, Pretoria, 8–9 June 2000. (Acknowledgement to C.H. Prinsloo and J.J. de Jager for data analysis reported in paper.)
19.
MullerM. (1994). Die gebruik van bepaalde sielkundige toetse as voorspellers van sukses behaal tydens 'n takseersentrum (The use of certain psychological tests as predictors of success during assessment centre activities). Unpublished Master's dissertation, University of Pretoria
20.
NellT. (1994). Die samestelling van 'n persoonlikheidsprofiel vir die keuring van bewakingsdienspersoneel (Establishing a personality profile for the selection of prison services staff). Unpublished Master's dissertation, University of Port Elizabeth
21.
OwenK. (1992). The suitability of Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices for various groups in South Africa. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 149–159
22.
PrinslooC.H. (1992). Manual for the use of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, South African 1992 version (16 PF, SA92).Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
23.
PrinslooC.H. (1998). The factor structure and readability of the S.A. English version of the Fifth Edition of the American 16PF.Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council (Report to the External Advisory Committee)
24.
PrinslooC.H. (1999). Fair personality assessment and the interface between test user and test producer. Paper presented on 1 March 1999 and 23 June 1999 at the Conference on Compliant Assessment Techniques arranged by the Institute for International Research, respectively at the VW Conference Centre, Midrand, 1–3 March 1999 and Sandton Crowne Plaza, Sandton, 23–25 June 1999
25.
PrinslooC.H. (2000). Methodology issues in personality assessment research. Paper presented on 9 June 2000 at the Industrial Psychology Conference (incorporating the Psychometrics Conference) arranged by the Society for Industrial Psychology, a Division of the Psychological Society of South Africa, CSIR Conference Centre, Pretoria, 8–9 June 2000
26.
PrinslooC.H.EbersöhnI.MaqungoB.NaidooD. (1998). The validity of the adapted 16PF(5) in a post-transition dispensation. Paper read on 10 September 1998 at the Fourth Annual Conference of the Psychological Society of South Africa, Cape Town, 9–11 September 1998
27.
PrinslooC.H.Van EedenR. (1995). The validity of the 16PF, SA92 for personality assessment in a multicultural context. Paper read at the Congress on Psychometrics for Psychologists and Personnel Practitioners presented by the Society for Industrial Psychology of South Africa (a Division of the Psychological Society of South Africa) at the CSIR Conference Centre, Pretoria, on 6 June 1995
28.
RademeyerA. (1995). The application of psychometrics in South African organisations within a changing labour market. Unpublished Master's dissertation, University of Pretoria
29.
RetiefA.I. (1992). The cross-cultural utility of the SAPQ — bias or fruitful differences?South African Journal of Psychology, 22, 202–207
30.
RoodtG. (1998). Challenges in psychological assessment. People Dynamics, 16(11), 30–34
31.
RossouwL. (1996). Biografiese besonderhede en persoonlikheidstrekke van kandidate vir professionele psigologie-opleiding (Biographical details and personality traits of candidates for professional training in psychology). Unpublished Master's dissertation, University of Port Elizabeth
32.
SchmitM.J.KihmJ.A.RobieC. (2000). Development of a global measure of personality. Personnel Psychology, 53, 153–193
33.
SteynL. (1996). Die persoonlikheidsprofiel vir die suksesvolle fisioterapiestudent as 'n keuringshulpmiddel aan die Universiteit van Pretoria (The personality profile of the successful physiotherapy student as an aid to selection at the University of Pretoria). Unpublished Master's dissertation, University of Pretoria
34.
SwanepoelS. (1996). Die voorspellingsgeldigheid van keuringskriteria vir akademiese prestasie van personeelbestuurstudente aan 'n technikon (The predictive validity of criteria for the selection of students in personnel management at a technikon). Unpublished Master's dissertation, University of Pretoria
35.
SwanepoelH.F.Van OudtshoornS.V.R. (1988). Die rol van persoonlikheidstrekke in die weerstand teen stres (The role of personality traits in the resistance towards stress). Journal of Industrial Psychology, 14(1), 18–22
36.
Van EedenR.De BeerM. (1998). Cognitive ability, learning potential, and personality: Predicting success at a South African tertiary institution. Paper presented at the 24th International Congress of Applied Psychology, San Francisco, 14 August 1998
37.
Van EedenR.PrinslooC.H. (1997). Using the South African version of the 16PF in a multicultural context. South African Journal of Psychology, 27(3), 151–159
38.
Van EedenR.TaylorT.R.Du ToitR. (1996). Adaptation and standardisation of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire Fifth Edition (16PF5) In South Africa: A feasibility study.Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council
39.
Van ZylP.J. (1999). Die validering van die Suid-Afrikaanse Polisiediens se keuringsbattery as voorspeller vir kollegeprestasie (The validation of the selection battery of the South African Police Service as predictor of college performance). Unpublished Master's dissertation, University of Pretoria
40.
WilliamsJ.E.SatterwhiteR.C.SaizJ.L. (1998). The importance of psychological traits: A cross-cultural study.New York: Plenum Press
