Abstract
Psychology, in particular clinical Psychology, has experienced strong growth in the twentieth century. This growth has been the strongest in industrialised, urbanised democracies, and as a result, the discipline has come under criticism for its Western bias. While not denying the possibility of such bias, this paper argues that an historical analysis provides a more thoroughgoing explanation for what has happened in the relationship between Psychology and these societies. Following Foucault, it is argued that there is a special affinity between Psychology and the government of individuals, and as a result, between Psychology and the self-understanding of individuals. As a result, the subject matter of the discipline itself is historically variable, and Psychology is reflexively involved in this process. The discipline already has an inescapable presence in “non-Western” countries, but how the interplay between government, Psychology, and its subject matter constructs and reconstructs human subjectivity in these societies remains unpredictable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
