In South Africa there is a lack of empirical data regarding the quality of the testimony of psychologists. In order to fill this gap, 252 South African lawyers were surveyed to determine their perception of the value of the testimony of psychologists, and of psychologists' knowledge, conduct, and adherence to the rules of expert testimony. For the purpose of comparison a group of 75 psychologists who do forensic work, were also surveyed. The findings was that lawyers generally did not believe that the potential value, or actual contribution, of psychological testimony was high. Their ratings of the actual knowledge of psychologists were significantly lower than their expectations in this regard. However, they rated the conduct and adherence of psychologists to the rules of expert testimony as satisfactory. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllanA. (1995a). The role of the psychologist in South African courts: A psycholegal appraisal. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein.
2.
AllanA. (1995b). The mental health practitioner as advocate for objective justice. Paper presented at the Psychiatry and the Law Congress, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 21–22 September 1995.
3.
AllanA.LouwD. A. (1995). Law and psychology in South Africa: Development and recommendations. Medicine & Law, 14, 685–692.
4.
AllanA.LouwD. A. (1997). The ultimate opinion rule and psychologists: A comparison of the expectations and experiences of South African lawyers. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 15, 307–320.
5.
AndertenP.StaulcupV.GrissoT. (1980). On being ethical in legal places. Professional Psychology, 11 (5), 764–773.
6.
Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). (1999). Background Paper: Experts. Canberra: Author.
7.
BartolC.R.BartolA.M. (1994). Psychology and Law. Research and Application. Pacific Grove, C.A.: Brooks/Cole.
8.
BazelonD. L. (1978). The role of the psychiatrist in the criminal justice system. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Bulletin, 6, 139.
9.
BazelonD. L. (1982). Veils, values, and social responsibility. American Psychologist, 37 (2), 115–121.
10.
BlauT. H. (1998). The psychologist as expert witness. (2nd ed). New York: John Wiley.
11.
BooysenW. H. (1992). Interim report of the commission of inquiry into the continued inclusion of psychopathy as a certifiable mental illness and the handling of psychopathic and other violent offenders. Pretoria: Government Printer.
12.
BrodskyS. L.RobeyI. (1971–1972). On becoming an expert witness: Issues of orientation and effectiveness. Professional Psychology, 173–176.
13.
BushD.WhiteK.R. (1995). Questionnaire distribution: A method that significantly improved return rates. Psychological Reports, 56, 427–430.
14.
CookeD. (1990). Being an expert in court. The Psychologist, 216–221.
15.
Criminal Procedure Act, 51 of 1977.
16.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
17.
DiamondB. (1975). The fallacy of the impartial expert. In AllenR. C.FersterE. Z.RubinJ. G. (Eds.), Readings in law and psychiatry (pp. 217–225). Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
18.
DiamondB. (1992). The forensic psychiatrist: Consultant versus activist in legal doctrine. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20, 119–132.
19.
Doyle v. Sentraboer (Co-operative) Ltd 1993 (3) SA 176 (SE).
20.
FaustD.ZiskinJ. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science, 241, 31–35.
21.
FerreiraJ. C. (1979). Strafproses in die laer howe. Cape Town: Juta.
22.
FreckeltonI. R. (1987). The trial of the expert: A study of expert evidence and forensic experts. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
23.
FreckeltonI. R.SelbyH. (1993). Expert evidence. (Vol. 1). North Ryde (NSW): Law Book Co.
24.
Frye v. United States 392 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
25.
Gentiruco AG v. Firestone SA (Pty) Ltd 1972 (1) SA 589 (A).
26.
GilbertG. N.MulkayM. (1985). Opening Pandora's box: Sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GrissoT. (1986). Evaluating competencies. New York: Plenum Press.
28.
GrissoT. (1987a). The economic and scientific future of forensic psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 42 (9), 831–839.
29.
GrissoT. (1987b). Psychological assessments for legal decisions. In WeisstubD. (Ed.), Law and mental health: International perspectives (pp. 125–157). New York: Pergamon.
30.
GrissoT. (1993). The difference between forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology. Bulleting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 21 (2), 133–145.
31.
HollienH. (1990). The phonetician as an expert witness. In RieberR. W.StewartW. A. (Eds.), The language scientist as expert in legal settings (pp. 33–45). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.
32.
Jonathan v. General Accident Insurance Co. 1992 (4) SA 618 (C).
33.
JonesC. A. G. (1994). Expert witnesses. Oxford: Claredon Press.
34.
KatzJ. (1992). The fallacy of the impartial expert. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20, 141–152.
35.
KrieglerJ. (1993). Die Suid-Afrikaanse strafprosesreg. Durban: Butterworths.
36.
KrugerA. (1983). Tekortkominge in wetgewing oor geestesongesteldes. Journal for Judicial Science, 8 (2), 182–192.
37.
Law Reform Commission of Western Australia (LRCWA). (1999). Review of the criminal and civil justice system in Western Australia. Perth: Author.
38.
LouwD. A.AllanA. (1995). Forensic psychology in South Africa. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 14 (4), 49–61.
39.
LouwD. A.AllanA. (1998). A profile of forensic psychologists in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 28 (4), 234–241.
40.
Mahlangu v. CIM Deltak & Gallant v. CIM Deltak (1986). Industrial Law Journal, 7, 346.
41.
Mahomed v. Shaik 1978(4) SA 523 (N).
42.
McKillipJ.LockhartD.C. (1984). The effectiveness of cover-letter appeals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 85–91.
43.
MeltonG. B. (1994). Expert opinions: “Not for cosmic understanding”. In SalesB.VandeBosG. (Eds.), Psychology in litigation and legislation (pp. 55–99). Washington: DC: American Psychological Association.
44.
MeltonG. B.PetrilaJ.PoythressN. G.SloboginC. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts. (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
45.
Mental Health Act, 18 of 1973.
46.
MorrisE. (1975). Technique in litigation. Cape Town: Juta.
47.
NicholasH. C. (1989). Some aspects of opinion evidence. In VisserC. (Ed.), Essays in honour of Ellison Kahn (pp. 225–237). Cape Town: Juta & Co.
48.
R v. Jacobs 1940 TPD 142.
49.
RaubenheimerB. (1998). False memories: South African Psychologists' Beliefs, Practices and experiences. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.
50.
RubinJ. G. (1975). The psychiatric report. In AllenR. C.FersterE. Z.RubinJ. G. (Eds.), Readings in law and psychiatry (pp. 125–128). Baltimore: John Hopkins.
51.
S v. Hopkins Unreported case in the Supreme Court of South Africa, Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division, case no 959/93.
52.
S v. Khumalo 1991(4) SA 310 (A).
53.
S v. Laubscher 1988 (1) SA 163(A).
54.
S v. Matshili 1991(3) SA 264 (A).
55.
S v. Motaung 1990 (4) SA 485 (T).
56.
S v. Safatsa 1988(1) SA 868(A).
57.
S v. Bothma. Unreported case in the Supreme Court of South Africa: Orange Free State Division.
58.
S v. Campher 1987 (1) SA 940 (A).
59.
S v. Dlamini 1991 (2) SACR 665 (A); 1992 (1) SA 18 (A).
60.
S v. Loyens 1974 (1) SA 330 (C).
61.
S v. Shabalala 1986 (4) SA 734 (A).
62.
S v. Wiid 1990 (1) SACR 561 (A).
63.
SachsA. (1976). The myth of judicial neutrality: The male monopoly case. In CarlenP. (Ed.), The sociology of law (pp. 104–133). Keele: University of Keele.
64.
SaksM. J. (1990). Expert witness, nonexpert witness, and nonwitness experts. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 291–313.
65.
Schultz-RossR. A. (1993). Ethics and the expert witness. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44 (4), 388–389.
66.
ShapiroD. L. (1984). Psychological evaluation and expert testimony. New York: Van Nostrand.
67.
South African Law Commission (SALC). (1995). The declaration and detention of persons as state patients under the Criminal Procedure Act, Act 51 of 1977, and the discharge of such persons under the Mental Health Act, Act 18 of 1973, including the burden of proof with regard to the mental state of an accused or convicted person. Pretoria: South African Law Commission.
68.
Stock v. Stock 1981 (3) SA 1280 (A).
69.
StraussS. (1991). Doctor, patient ad the law. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
70.
Supreme Court Rules, Government Gazette Extraordinary 999 dated 12 January 1965.
71.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
72.
Van WykJ. T. (1972). Report of the commission of inquiry into the Mental Disorders Act, 1916 (Act 38 of 1916, as amended) and related matters. (Second Van Wyk Report) (RP 80/1972). Pretoria: Government Printer.
73.
VerschoorT.CalitzF. J. W.Van RensburgP. H. J. (1994). Deskundige getuienis. Geneeskunde, 4, 5–10.
74.
Woolf Report. (1995). Access to Justice: Interim report to the Lord Chancellor on the civil justice system in England and Wales. HMSO. Available: http://w.w.w.law.warwick.ac.uk/Woolf/woolf.html [25-1-2000].
75.
Woolf Report. (1996). Access to Justice: Final report to the Lord Chancellor on the civil justice system in England and Wales. HMSO. Available: http://w.w.w.law.warwick.ac.uk/woolf/report [25-1-2000].
76.
ZimbardoP. G. (1970). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In ArnoldW. J.LevineD. (Eds.), Nebraska Sympsosium on Motivation, 1969 (pp. 237–259). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
77.
ZiskinJ.FaustD. (1988). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony. (Vol. 1–3). Los Angeles: Law and Psychology Press.
